Cargando…
Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743844 http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 |
_version_ | 1783320144014999552 |
---|---|
author | Chaubal, Alisha Pandey, Vikas Patel, Ruchir Poddar, Prateik Phadke, Aniruddha Ingle, Meghraj Sawant, Prabha |
author_facet | Chaubal, Alisha Pandey, Vikas Patel, Ruchir Poddar, Prateik Phadke, Aniruddha Ingle, Meghraj Sawant, Prabha |
author_sort | Chaubal, Alisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m(2) or more than 30 kg/m(2), or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m(2) and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m(2). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5934604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59346042018-05-09 Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? Chaubal, Alisha Pandey, Vikas Patel, Ruchir Poddar, Prateik Phadke, Aniruddha Ingle, Meghraj Sawant, Prabha Intest Res Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m(2) or more than 30 kg/m(2), or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m(2) and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m(2). Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases 2018-04 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5934604/ /pubmed/29743844 http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 Text en © Copyright 2018. Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chaubal, Alisha Pandey, Vikas Patel, Ruchir Poddar, Prateik Phadke, Aniruddha Ingle, Meghraj Sawant, Prabha Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title | Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title_full | Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title_fullStr | Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title_short | Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
title_sort | difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743844 http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaubalalisha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT pandeyvikas difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT patelruchir difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT poddarprateik difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT phadkeaniruddha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT inglemeghraj difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation AT sawantprabha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation |