Cargando…

Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaubal, Alisha, Pandey, Vikas, Patel, Ruchir, Poddar, Prateik, Phadke, Aniruddha, Ingle, Meghraj, Sawant, Prabha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743844
http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299
_version_ 1783320144014999552
author Chaubal, Alisha
Pandey, Vikas
Patel, Ruchir
Poddar, Prateik
Phadke, Aniruddha
Ingle, Meghraj
Sawant, Prabha
author_facet Chaubal, Alisha
Pandey, Vikas
Patel, Ruchir
Poddar, Prateik
Phadke, Aniruddha
Ingle, Meghraj
Sawant, Prabha
author_sort Chaubal, Alisha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m(2) or more than 30 kg/m(2), or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m(2) and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m(2).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5934604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59346042018-05-09 Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? Chaubal, Alisha Pandey, Vikas Patel, Ruchir Poddar, Prateik Phadke, Aniruddha Ingle, Meghraj Sawant, Prabha Intest Res Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m(2) or more than 30 kg/m(2), or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m(2) and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m(2). Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases 2018-04 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5934604/ /pubmed/29743844 http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 Text en © Copyright 2018. Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaubal, Alisha
Pandey, Vikas
Patel, Ruchir
Poddar, Prateik
Phadke, Aniruddha
Ingle, Meghraj
Sawant, Prabha
Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title_full Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title_fullStr Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title_full_unstemmed Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title_short Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
title_sort difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743844
http://dx.doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299
work_keys_str_mv AT chaubalalisha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT pandeyvikas difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT patelruchir difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT poddarprateik difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT phadkeaniruddha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT inglemeghraj difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation
AT sawantprabha difficultcolonoscopyaircarbondioxideorwaterinsufflation