Cargando…
The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5 |
_version_ | 1783320209836212224 |
---|---|
author | Kawaguchi, Takashi Azuma, Kanako Sano, Motohiko Kim, Soan Kawahara, Yosuke Sano, Yoko Shimodaira, Tomohide Ishibashi, Keiichiro Miyaji, Tempei Basch, Ethan Yamaguchi, Takuhiro |
author_facet | Kawaguchi, Takashi Azuma, Kanako Sano, Motohiko Kim, Soan Kawahara, Yosuke Sano, Yoko Shimodaira, Tomohide Ishibashi, Keiichiro Miyaji, Tempei Basch, Ethan Yamaguchi, Takuhiro |
author_sort | Kawaguchi, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE and the degree of adverse event assessment discordance between clinicians and patients. METHODS: A total of 187 cancer patients receiving systemic therapy were enrolled. Reproducibility, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of PROCTCAE were assessed. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as an external anchor. Discordance of assessment of adverse events between clinician and patients were also assessed using the CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE. RESULTS: A total of 187 participants (187 for criterion validity, 80 for reproducibility, and 100 for responsiveness), were analyzed (Mage = 62.4 years). All patients responded to at least one symptom item (M = 16). The mean (SD) intra-class correlation coefficients of overall reproducibility for the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was 0.63 (0.02). The correlation coefficient for the corresponding items in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was high (Pearson r = 0.56–0.76). The analysis of responsiveness revealed significant dose-response trends (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, ps < 0.001). Depending on the adverse events, a discrepancy was observed in evaluation between the clinician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed that there is underestimation in the assessment of adverse events in Japan, and that the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE had acceptable reliability and validity for common and clinically important symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5934922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59349222018-05-09 The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events Kawaguchi, Takashi Azuma, Kanako Sano, Motohiko Kim, Soan Kawahara, Yosuke Sano, Yoko Shimodaira, Tomohide Ishibashi, Keiichiro Miyaji, Tempei Basch, Ethan Yamaguchi, Takuhiro J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE and the degree of adverse event assessment discordance between clinicians and patients. METHODS: A total of 187 cancer patients receiving systemic therapy were enrolled. Reproducibility, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of PROCTCAE were assessed. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as an external anchor. Discordance of assessment of adverse events between clinician and patients were also assessed using the CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE. RESULTS: A total of 187 participants (187 for criterion validity, 80 for reproducibility, and 100 for responsiveness), were analyzed (Mage = 62.4 years). All patients responded to at least one symptom item (M = 16). The mean (SD) intra-class correlation coefficients of overall reproducibility for the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was 0.63 (0.02). The correlation coefficient for the corresponding items in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was high (Pearson r = 0.56–0.76). The analysis of responsiveness revealed significant dose-response trends (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, ps < 0.001). Depending on the adverse events, a discrepancy was observed in evaluation between the clinician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed that there is underestimation in the assessment of adverse events in Japan, and that the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE had acceptable reliability and validity for common and clinically important symptoms. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5934922/ /pubmed/29757309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Kawaguchi, Takashi Azuma, Kanako Sano, Motohiko Kim, Soan Kawahara, Yosuke Sano, Yoko Shimodaira, Tomohide Ishibashi, Keiichiro Miyaji, Tempei Basch, Ethan Yamaguchi, Takuhiro The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title | The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title_full | The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title_fullStr | The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title_full_unstemmed | The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title_short | The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
title_sort | japanese version of the national cancer institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (pro-ctcae): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawaguchitakashi thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT azumakanako thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT sanomotohiko thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT kimsoan thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT kawaharayosuke thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT sanoyoko thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT shimodairatomohide thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT ishibashikeiichiro thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT miyajitempei thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT baschethan thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT yamaguchitakuhiro thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT kawaguchitakashi japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT azumakanako japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT sanomotohiko japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT kimsoan japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT kawaharayosuke japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT sanoyoko japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT shimodairatomohide japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT ishibashikeiichiro japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT miyajitempei japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT baschethan japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents AT yamaguchitakuhiro japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents |