Cargando…

The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawaguchi, Takashi, Azuma, Kanako, Sano, Motohiko, Kim, Soan, Kawahara, Yosuke, Sano, Yoko, Shimodaira, Tomohide, Ishibashi, Keiichiro, Miyaji, Tempei, Basch, Ethan, Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5
_version_ 1783320209836212224
author Kawaguchi, Takashi
Azuma, Kanako
Sano, Motohiko
Kim, Soan
Kawahara, Yosuke
Sano, Yoko
Shimodaira, Tomohide
Ishibashi, Keiichiro
Miyaji, Tempei
Basch, Ethan
Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
author_facet Kawaguchi, Takashi
Azuma, Kanako
Sano, Motohiko
Kim, Soan
Kawahara, Yosuke
Sano, Yoko
Shimodaira, Tomohide
Ishibashi, Keiichiro
Miyaji, Tempei
Basch, Ethan
Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
author_sort Kawaguchi, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE and the degree of adverse event assessment discordance between clinicians and patients. METHODS: A total of 187 cancer patients receiving systemic therapy were enrolled. Reproducibility, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of PROCTCAE were assessed. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as an external anchor. Discordance of assessment of adverse events between clinician and patients were also assessed using the CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE. RESULTS: A total of 187 participants (187 for criterion validity, 80 for reproducibility, and 100 for responsiveness), were analyzed (Mage = 62.4 years). All patients responded to at least one symptom item (M = 16). The mean (SD) intra-class correlation coefficients of overall reproducibility for the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was 0.63 (0.02). The correlation coefficient for the corresponding items in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was high (Pearson r = 0.56–0.76). The analysis of responsiveness revealed significant dose-response trends (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, ps < 0.001). Depending on the adverse events, a discrepancy was observed in evaluation between the clinician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed that there is underestimation in the assessment of adverse events in Japan, and that the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE had acceptable reliability and validity for common and clinically important symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5934922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59349222018-05-09 The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events Kawaguchi, Takashi Azuma, Kanako Sano, Motohiko Kim, Soan Kawahara, Yosuke Sano, Yoko Shimodaira, Tomohide Ishibashi, Keiichiro Miyaji, Tempei Basch, Ethan Yamaguchi, Takuhiro J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed by the National Cancer Institute as an adverse event assessment system to evaluate patients’ symptoms, which tend to be underestimated in cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE and the degree of adverse event assessment discordance between clinicians and patients. METHODS: A total of 187 cancer patients receiving systemic therapy were enrolled. Reproducibility, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of PROCTCAE were assessed. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as an external anchor. Discordance of assessment of adverse events between clinician and patients were also assessed using the CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE. RESULTS: A total of 187 participants (187 for criterion validity, 80 for reproducibility, and 100 for responsiveness), were analyzed (Mage = 62.4 years). All patients responded to at least one symptom item (M = 16). The mean (SD) intra-class correlation coefficients of overall reproducibility for the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was 0.63 (0.02). The correlation coefficient for the corresponding items in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Japanese PRO-CTCAE was high (Pearson r = 0.56–0.76). The analysis of responsiveness revealed significant dose-response trends (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, ps < 0.001). Depending on the adverse events, a discrepancy was observed in evaluation between the clinician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results revealed that there is underestimation in the assessment of adverse events in Japan, and that the Japanese version of the PRO-CTCAE had acceptable reliability and validity for common and clinically important symptoms. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5934922/ /pubmed/29757309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Kawaguchi, Takashi
Azuma, Kanako
Sano, Motohiko
Kim, Soan
Kawahara, Yosuke
Sano, Yoko
Shimodaira, Tomohide
Ishibashi, Keiichiro
Miyaji, Tempei
Basch, Ethan
Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title_full The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title_fullStr The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title_full_unstemmed The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title_short The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
title_sort japanese version of the national cancer institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (pro-ctcae): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0022-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaguchitakashi thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT azumakanako thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT sanomotohiko thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT kimsoan thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT kawaharayosuke thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT sanoyoko thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT shimodairatomohide thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT ishibashikeiichiro thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT miyajitempei thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT baschethan thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT yamaguchitakuhiro thejapaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT kawaguchitakashi japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT azumakanako japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT sanomotohiko japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT kimsoan japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT kawaharayosuke japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT sanoyoko japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT shimodairatomohide japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT ishibashikeiichiro japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT miyajitempei japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT baschethan japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents
AT yamaguchitakuhiro japaneseversionofthenationalcancerinstitutespatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcaepsychometricvalidationanddiscordancebetweenclinicianandpatientassessmentsofadverseevents