Cargando…
Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma
BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf) is widely used in self-reported pain assessment, incorporates pain numeric rating scales (NRS) and is commonly utilized in electronic format in clinical trials, however, there is no published information about its usability as an electronic pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0039-4 |
_version_ | 1783320212154613760 |
---|---|
author | Gelhorn, Heather L. Eremenco, Sonya Skalicky, Anne M. Balantac, Zaneta Cimms, Tricia Halling, Katarina Sexton, Chris |
author_facet | Gelhorn, Heather L. Eremenco, Sonya Skalicky, Anne M. Balantac, Zaneta Cimms, Tricia Halling, Katarina Sexton, Chris |
author_sort | Gelhorn, Heather L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf) is widely used in self-reported pain assessment, incorporates pain numeric rating scales (NRS) and is commonly utilized in electronic format in clinical trials, however, there is no published information about its usability as an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measure. The objective of this qualitative study was threefold: 1) to better understand pain experiences among patients with pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma; 2) to assess the interpretability of the instructions, item stem, recall period, and response option of the “worst pain” item of the BPI-sf; and 3) to examine the usability of the TrialMax Touch™ (CRF Health, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA) screen-based handheld device and the electronic format of the BPI-sf in a sub-sample of pleural mesothelioma patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted among participants with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma recruited from 4 clinical sites in the US. Semi-structured telephone or in-person interviews were conducted consisting of concept elicitation, cognitive interviewing of the 11-item BPI-sf, and in-person interview evaluation of ePRO assessment usability in pleural mesothelioma patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants recruited from 4 clinical sites in the US were interviewed in-person (n = 9) and by telephone (n = 12); 71% male; mean age 68.7 ± 13.6 years. Pleural and peritoneal patients described pain as ranging from discomfort to intense pain and reported being able to distinguish tumor pain from treatment pain. The BPI-sf “worst pain” item was relevant to, and easily understood by, study participants with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. The ePRO version was found to be easy to use, but readability of small font may be an issue. Participants reported minimal differences between their responses on the paper and ePRO version for all of the pain severity and pain interference items. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the relevance and ease of understanding of the “worst pain” item and provide support for its content validity in patients with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. Usability of the ePRO format of the BPI-sf was confirmed for use in clinical trials among patients with pleural mesothelioma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41687-018-0039-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5934933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59349332018-05-09 Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma Gelhorn, Heather L. Eremenco, Sonya Skalicky, Anne M. Balantac, Zaneta Cimms, Tricia Halling, Katarina Sexton, Chris J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf) is widely used in self-reported pain assessment, incorporates pain numeric rating scales (NRS) and is commonly utilized in electronic format in clinical trials, however, there is no published information about its usability as an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measure. The objective of this qualitative study was threefold: 1) to better understand pain experiences among patients with pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma; 2) to assess the interpretability of the instructions, item stem, recall period, and response option of the “worst pain” item of the BPI-sf; and 3) to examine the usability of the TrialMax Touch™ (CRF Health, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA) screen-based handheld device and the electronic format of the BPI-sf in a sub-sample of pleural mesothelioma patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted among participants with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma recruited from 4 clinical sites in the US. Semi-structured telephone or in-person interviews were conducted consisting of concept elicitation, cognitive interviewing of the 11-item BPI-sf, and in-person interview evaluation of ePRO assessment usability in pleural mesothelioma patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants recruited from 4 clinical sites in the US were interviewed in-person (n = 9) and by telephone (n = 12); 71% male; mean age 68.7 ± 13.6 years. Pleural and peritoneal patients described pain as ranging from discomfort to intense pain and reported being able to distinguish tumor pain from treatment pain. The BPI-sf “worst pain” item was relevant to, and easily understood by, study participants with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. The ePRO version was found to be easy to use, but readability of small font may be an issue. Participants reported minimal differences between their responses on the paper and ePRO version for all of the pain severity and pain interference items. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the relevance and ease of understanding of the “worst pain” item and provide support for its content validity in patients with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. Usability of the ePRO format of the BPI-sf was confirmed for use in clinical trials among patients with pleural mesothelioma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41687-018-0039-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5934933/ /pubmed/29749970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0039-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Gelhorn, Heather L. Eremenco, Sonya Skalicky, Anne M. Balantac, Zaneta Cimms, Tricia Halling, Katarina Sexton, Chris Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title | Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title_full | Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title_fullStr | Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title_full_unstemmed | Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title_short | Content validity and ePRO usability of the BPI-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
title_sort | content validity and epro usability of the bpi-sf and “worst pain” item with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0039-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gelhornheatherl contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT eremencosonya contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT skalickyannem contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT balantaczaneta contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT cimmstricia contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT hallingkatarina contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma AT sextonchris contentvalidityandeprousabilityofthebpisfandworstpainitemwithpleuralandperitonealmesothelioma |