Cargando…

Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts

Purpose: Recognising that one way to address the logistical and safety considerations of research conducted in humanitarian emergencies is to use internet communication technologies to facilitate interviews online, this article explores some practical and methodological considerations inherent to qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiumento, Anna, Machin, Laura, Rahman, Atif, Frith, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1444887
_version_ 1783320253623697408
author Chiumento, Anna
Machin, Laura
Rahman, Atif
Frith, Lucy
author_facet Chiumento, Anna
Machin, Laura
Rahman, Atif
Frith, Lucy
author_sort Chiumento, Anna
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Recognising that one way to address the logistical and safety considerations of research conducted in humanitarian emergencies is to use internet communication technologies to facilitate interviews online, this article explores some practical and methodological considerations inherent to qualitative online interviewing. Method: Reflections from a case study of a multi-site research project conducted in post-conflict countries are presented.  Synchronous online cross-language qualitative interviews were conducted in one country.  Although only a small proportion of interviews were conducted online (six out of 35), it remains important to critically consider the impact upon data produced in this way. Results: A range of practical and methodological considerations are discussed, illustrated with examples.  Results suggest that whilst online interviewing has methodological and ethical potential and versatility, there are inherent practical challenges in settings with poor internet and electricity infrastructure.  Notable methodological limitations include barriers to building rapport due to partial visual and non-visual cues, and difficulties interpreting pauses or silences. Conclusions: Drawing upon experiences in this case study, strategies for managing the practical and methodological limitations of online interviewing are suggested, alongside recommendations for supporting future research practice.  These are intended to act as a springboard for further reflection, and operate alongside other conceptual frameworks for online interviewing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5935183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59351832018-05-08 Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts Chiumento, Anna Machin, Laura Rahman, Atif Frith, Lucy Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Empirical Studies Purpose: Recognising that one way to address the logistical and safety considerations of research conducted in humanitarian emergencies is to use internet communication technologies to facilitate interviews online, this article explores some practical and methodological considerations inherent to qualitative online interviewing. Method: Reflections from a case study of a multi-site research project conducted in post-conflict countries are presented.  Synchronous online cross-language qualitative interviews were conducted in one country.  Although only a small proportion of interviews were conducted online (six out of 35), it remains important to critically consider the impact upon data produced in this way. Results: A range of practical and methodological considerations are discussed, illustrated with examples.  Results suggest that whilst online interviewing has methodological and ethical potential and versatility, there are inherent practical challenges in settings with poor internet and electricity infrastructure.  Notable methodological limitations include barriers to building rapport due to partial visual and non-visual cues, and difficulties interpreting pauses or silences. Conclusions: Drawing upon experiences in this case study, strategies for managing the practical and methodological limitations of online interviewing are suggested, alongside recommendations for supporting future research practice.  These are intended to act as a springboard for further reflection, and operate alongside other conceptual frameworks for online interviewing. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5935183/ /pubmed/29532739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1444887 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Empirical Studies
Chiumento, Anna
Machin, Laura
Rahman, Atif
Frith, Lucy
Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title_full Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title_fullStr Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title_full_unstemmed Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title_short Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
title_sort online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts
topic Empirical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1444887
work_keys_str_mv AT chiumentoanna onlineinterviewingwithinterpretersinhumanitariancontexts
AT machinlaura onlineinterviewingwithinterpretersinhumanitariancontexts
AT rahmanatif onlineinterviewingwithinterpretersinhumanitariancontexts
AT frithlucy onlineinterviewingwithinterpretersinhumanitariancontexts