Cargando…

3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

Bone is the second most commonly transplanted tissue worldwide, with over four million operations using bone grafts or bone substitute materials annually to treat bone defects. However, significant limitations affect current treatment options and clinical demand for bone grafts continues to rise due...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turnbull, Gareth, Clarke, Jon, Picard, Frédéric, Riches, Philip, Jia, Luanluan, Han, Fengxuan, Li, Bin, Shu, Wenmiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001
_version_ 1783320331899895808
author Turnbull, Gareth
Clarke, Jon
Picard, Frédéric
Riches, Philip
Jia, Luanluan
Han, Fengxuan
Li, Bin
Shu, Wenmiao
author_facet Turnbull, Gareth
Clarke, Jon
Picard, Frédéric
Riches, Philip
Jia, Luanluan
Han, Fengxuan
Li, Bin
Shu, Wenmiao
author_sort Turnbull, Gareth
collection PubMed
description Bone is the second most commonly transplanted tissue worldwide, with over four million operations using bone grafts or bone substitute materials annually to treat bone defects. However, significant limitations affect current treatment options and clinical demand for bone grafts continues to rise due to conditions such as trauma, cancer, infection and arthritis. Developing bioactive three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to support bone regeneration has therefore become a key area of focus within bone tissue engineering (BTE). A variety of materials and manufacturing methods including 3D printing have been used to create novel alternatives to traditional bone grafts. However, individual groups of materials including polymers, ceramics and hydrogels have been unable to fully replicate the properties of bone when used alone. Favourable material properties can be combined and bioactivity improved when groups of materials are used together in composite 3D scaffolds. This review will therefore consider the ideal properties of bioactive composite 3D scaffolds and examine recent use of polymers, hydrogels, metals, ceramics and bio-glasses in BTE. Scaffold fabrication methodology, mechanical performance, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and potential clinical translations will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5935790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59357902018-05-09 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering Turnbull, Gareth Clarke, Jon Picard, Frédéric Riches, Philip Jia, Luanluan Han, Fengxuan Li, Bin Shu, Wenmiao Bioact Mater Article Bone is the second most commonly transplanted tissue worldwide, with over four million operations using bone grafts or bone substitute materials annually to treat bone defects. However, significant limitations affect current treatment options and clinical demand for bone grafts continues to rise due to conditions such as trauma, cancer, infection and arthritis. Developing bioactive three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to support bone regeneration has therefore become a key area of focus within bone tissue engineering (BTE). A variety of materials and manufacturing methods including 3D printing have been used to create novel alternatives to traditional bone grafts. However, individual groups of materials including polymers, ceramics and hydrogels have been unable to fully replicate the properties of bone when used alone. Favourable material properties can be combined and bioactivity improved when groups of materials are used together in composite 3D scaffolds. This review will therefore consider the ideal properties of bioactive composite 3D scaffolds and examine recent use of polymers, hydrogels, metals, ceramics and bio-glasses in BTE. Scaffold fabrication methodology, mechanical performance, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and potential clinical translations will be discussed. KeAi Publishing 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5935790/ /pubmed/29744467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Turnbull, Gareth
Clarke, Jon
Picard, Frédéric
Riches, Philip
Jia, Luanluan
Han, Fengxuan
Li, Bin
Shu, Wenmiao
3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title_full 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title_fullStr 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title_full_unstemmed 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title_short 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
title_sort 3d bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT turnbullgareth 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT clarkejon 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT picardfrederic 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT richesphilip 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT jialuanluan 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT hanfengxuan 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT libin 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT shuwenmiao 3dbioactivecompositescaffoldsforbonetissueengineering