Cargando…
It is merely subjective opinion that patient-reported outcome measures are not objective tools
Autores principales: | Hamilton, D. F., Giesinger, J. M., Giesinger, K. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.612.BJR-2017-0347 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Technological developments enable measuring and using patient-reported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice
por: Hamilton, David F, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty
por: Giesinger, K., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Higher body mass index is associated with larger postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty
por: Giesinger, K, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity
por: Giesinger, Johannes M, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Minimal important differences for the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in total knee arthroplasty patients
por: Holtz, N., et al.
Publicado: (2020)