Cargando…
Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity
OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail the recruitment methods and enrollment rates, the screening methods, and the baseline characteristics of a sample of adults participating in the Walk 2.0 Study, an 18 month, 3-arm randomized controlled trial of a Web 2.0 based physical activity intervention. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.004 |
_version_ | 1783320340346175488 |
---|---|
author | Caperchione, Cristina M. Duncan, Mitch J. Rosenkranz, Richard R. Vandelanotte, Corneel Van Itallie, Anetta K. Savage, Trevor N. Hooker, Cindy Maeder, Anthony J. Mummery, W. Kerry Kolt, Gregory S. |
author_facet | Caperchione, Cristina M. Duncan, Mitch J. Rosenkranz, Richard R. Vandelanotte, Corneel Van Itallie, Anetta K. Savage, Trevor N. Hooker, Cindy Maeder, Anthony J. Mummery, W. Kerry Kolt, Gregory S. |
author_sort | Caperchione, Cristina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail the recruitment methods and enrollment rates, the screening methods, and the baseline characteristics of a sample of adults participating in the Walk 2.0 Study, an 18 month, 3-arm randomized controlled trial of a Web 2.0 based physical activity intervention. METHODS: A two-fold recruitment plan was developed and implemented, including a direct mail-out to an extract from the Australian Electoral Commission electoral roll, and other supplementary methods including email and telephone. Physical activity screening involved two steps: a validated single-item self-report instrument and the follow-up Active Australia Questionnaire. Readiness for physical activity participation was also based on a two-step process of administering the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire and, where needed, further clearance from a medical practitioner. RESULTS: Across all recruitment methods, a total of 1244 participants expressed interest in participating, of which 656 were deemed eligible. Of these, 504 were later enrolled in the Walk 2.0 trial (77% enrollment rate) and randomized to the Walk 1.0 group (n = 165), the Walk 2.0 group (n = 168), or the Logbook group (n = 171). Mean age of the total sample was 50.8 years, with 65.2% female and 79.1% born in Australia. CONCLUSION: The results of this recruitment process demonstrate the successful use of multiple strategies to obtain a diverse sample of adults eligible to take part in a web-based physical activity promotion intervention. The use of dual screening processes ensured safe participation in the intervention. This approach to recruitment and physical activity screening can be used as a model for further trials in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5935835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59358352018-05-07 Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity Caperchione, Cristina M. Duncan, Mitch J. Rosenkranz, Richard R. Vandelanotte, Corneel Van Itallie, Anetta K. Savage, Trevor N. Hooker, Cindy Maeder, Anthony J. Mummery, W. Kerry Kolt, Gregory S. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail the recruitment methods and enrollment rates, the screening methods, and the baseline characteristics of a sample of adults participating in the Walk 2.0 Study, an 18 month, 3-arm randomized controlled trial of a Web 2.0 based physical activity intervention. METHODS: A two-fold recruitment plan was developed and implemented, including a direct mail-out to an extract from the Australian Electoral Commission electoral roll, and other supplementary methods including email and telephone. Physical activity screening involved two steps: a validated single-item self-report instrument and the follow-up Active Australia Questionnaire. Readiness for physical activity participation was also based on a two-step process of administering the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire and, where needed, further clearance from a medical practitioner. RESULTS: Across all recruitment methods, a total of 1244 participants expressed interest in participating, of which 656 were deemed eligible. Of these, 504 were later enrolled in the Walk 2.0 trial (77% enrollment rate) and randomized to the Walk 1.0 group (n = 165), the Walk 2.0 group (n = 168), or the Logbook group (n = 171). Mean age of the total sample was 50.8 years, with 65.2% female and 79.1% born in Australia. CONCLUSION: The results of this recruitment process demonstrate the successful use of multiple strategies to obtain a diverse sample of adults eligible to take part in a web-based physical activity promotion intervention. The use of dual screening processes ensured safe participation in the intervention. This approach to recruitment and physical activity screening can be used as a model for further trials in this area. Elsevier 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5935835/ /pubmed/29736444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.004 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Caperchione, Cristina M. Duncan, Mitch J. Rosenkranz, Richard R. Vandelanotte, Corneel Van Itallie, Anetta K. Savage, Trevor N. Hooker, Cindy Maeder, Anthony J. Mummery, W. Kerry Kolt, Gregory S. Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title | Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title_full | Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title_fullStr | Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title_short | Recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the WALK 2.0 study: A randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
title_sort | recruitment, screening, and baseline participant characteristics in the walk 2.0 study: a randomized controlled trial using web 2.0 applications to promote physical activity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caperchionecristinam recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT duncanmitchj recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT rosenkranzrichardr recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT vandelanottecorneel recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT vanitallieanettak recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT savagetrevorn recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT hookercindy recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT maederanthonyj recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT mummerywkerry recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity AT koltgregorys recruitmentscreeningandbaselineparticipantcharacteristicsinthewalk20studyarandomizedcontrolledtrialusingweb20applicationstopromotephysicalactivity |