Cargando…

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, chronic and ultimately fatal disease for which only palliative treatments existed until recently. Between 2011 and 2015, two new drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, were approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of IPF, providing hope for patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Audibert, Céline, Livoti, Christine, Caze, Alexis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.008
_version_ 1783320341514289152
author Audibert, Céline
Livoti, Christine
Caze, Alexis
author_facet Audibert, Céline
Livoti, Christine
Caze, Alexis
author_sort Audibert, Céline
collection PubMed
description Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, chronic and ultimately fatal disease for which only palliative treatments existed until recently. Between 2011 and 2015, two new drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, were approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of IPF, providing hope for patients. The objectives of our work were to understand physicians' expected use of these new treatments in the US and Europe, and to estimate their potential. To achieve this goal, we conducted surveys amongst US and European Union (EU) pulmonologists caring for patients with IPF. There was a significant difference between EU and US physicians in the treatment of patients with mild disease with pirfenidone; the EU physicians anticipated using pirfenidone for 57% of their patients with mild disease, whereas the US pulmonologists anticipated using it for 34% of their patients (p = 0.01). Regarding patients with severe disease, the US pulmonologists anticipated treating 74% with either pirfenidone (46%) or nintedanib (28%), whereas the EU pulmonologists treated 28% with pirfenidone and anticipated treating 20% with nintedanib. These findings suggest treatment with pirfenidone and nintedanib based on disease severity may vary between US and EU physicians, which may affect patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5935841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59358412018-05-07 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs Audibert, Céline Livoti, Christine Caze, Alexis Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, chronic and ultimately fatal disease for which only palliative treatments existed until recently. Between 2011 and 2015, two new drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, were approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of IPF, providing hope for patients. The objectives of our work were to understand physicians' expected use of these new treatments in the US and Europe, and to estimate their potential. To achieve this goal, we conducted surveys amongst US and European Union (EU) pulmonologists caring for patients with IPF. There was a significant difference between EU and US physicians in the treatment of patients with mild disease with pirfenidone; the EU physicians anticipated using pirfenidone for 57% of their patients with mild disease, whereas the US pulmonologists anticipated using it for 34% of their patients (p = 0.01). Regarding patients with severe disease, the US pulmonologists anticipated treating 74% with either pirfenidone (46%) or nintedanib (28%), whereas the EU pulmonologists treated 28% with pirfenidone and anticipated treating 20% with nintedanib. These findings suggest treatment with pirfenidone and nintedanib based on disease severity may vary between US and EU physicians, which may affect patient outcomes. Elsevier 2016-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5935841/ /pubmed/29736460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.008 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Audibert, Céline
Livoti, Christine
Caze, Alexis
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title_full Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title_fullStr Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title_full_unstemmed Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title_short Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
title_sort idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: physicians' perceptions of patient treatment with recently approved drugs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.008
work_keys_str_mv AT audibertceline idiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisphysiciansperceptionsofpatienttreatmentwithrecentlyapproveddrugs
AT livotichristine idiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisphysiciansperceptionsofpatienttreatmentwithrecentlyapproveddrugs
AT cazealexis idiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisphysiciansperceptionsofpatienttreatmentwithrecentlyapproveddrugs