Cargando…

Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?

An elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perna, Gian Piero, Vagnarelli, Fabio, Volterrani, Maurizio, Battistoni, Ilaria, Rapezzi, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.003
_version_ 1783320348980150272
author Perna, Gian Piero
Vagnarelli, Fabio
Volterrani, Maurizio
Battistoni, Ilaria
Rapezzi, Claudio
author_facet Perna, Gian Piero
Vagnarelli, Fabio
Volterrani, Maurizio
Battistoni, Ilaria
Rapezzi, Claudio
author_sort Perna, Gian Piero
collection PubMed
description An elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However the addition of ivabradine to standard therapy to reduce heart rate did not improve outcomes in the recent SIGNIFY trial. Moreover, a significant interaction between the effect of ivabradine among subgroups with and without angina was detected, with a worse outcome in patients in CCS class >II at baseline. The explanation for this surprising finding despite a significant reduction in angina and myocardial revascularization procedures is uncertain. A J-curve for heart rate was not demonstrated. We speculate a significant interference on adverse events (mainly atrial fibrillation and consequently acute coronary syndromes) and on the outcome of unfavorable interactions between ivabradine and diltiazem, verapamil and strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (4.6% of the total population). Indeed, when these patients are excluded from subgroup analysis, the harmful effect of Ivabradine among patients with severe angina disappears. In conclusion, heart rate is a marker of risk but is not a risk factor and/or a target of therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular systolic function. Standard doses of ivabradine are indicated for treatment of angina as an alternative or in addition to beta-blockers, but should not be administered in association with CYP3A4 inhibitors or heart rate-lowering calcium-channel blockers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5935893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59358932018-05-07 Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY? Perna, Gian Piero Vagnarelli, Fabio Volterrani, Maurizio Battistoni, Ilaria Rapezzi, Claudio Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article An elevated heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the “f” current in the sinus node and reduces heart rate without any modifications of blood pressure, myocardial contractility and arteriolar resistance. However the addition of ivabradine to standard therapy to reduce heart rate did not improve outcomes in the recent SIGNIFY trial. Moreover, a significant interaction between the effect of ivabradine among subgroups with and without angina was detected, with a worse outcome in patients in CCS class >II at baseline. The explanation for this surprising finding despite a significant reduction in angina and myocardial revascularization procedures is uncertain. A J-curve for heart rate was not demonstrated. We speculate a significant interference on adverse events (mainly atrial fibrillation and consequently acute coronary syndromes) and on the outcome of unfavorable interactions between ivabradine and diltiazem, verapamil and strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (4.6% of the total population). Indeed, when these patients are excluded from subgroup analysis, the harmful effect of Ivabradine among patients with severe angina disappears. In conclusion, heart rate is a marker of risk but is not a risk factor and/or a target of therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular systolic function. Standard doses of ivabradine are indicated for treatment of angina as an alternative or in addition to beta-blockers, but should not be administered in association with CYP3A4 inhibitors or heart rate-lowering calcium-channel blockers. Elsevier 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5935893/ /pubmed/29736470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.003 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Perna, Gian Piero
Vagnarelli, Fabio
Volterrani, Maurizio
Battistoni, Ilaria
Rapezzi, Claudio
Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_full Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_fullStr Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_full_unstemmed Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_short Heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: What we have already learned from SIGNIFY?
title_sort heart rate modulation in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure: what we have already learned from signify?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5935893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.003
work_keys_str_mv AT pernagianpiero heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT vagnarellifabio heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT volterranimaurizio heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT battistoniilaria heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify
AT rapezziclaudio heartratemodulationinstablecoronaryarterydiseasewithoutclinicalheartfailurewhatwehavealreadylearnedfromsignify