Cargando…
Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA
BACKGROUND: Evolving interest in comprehensively profiling the full range of small RNAs present in small tissue biopsies and in circulating biofluids, and how the profile differs with disease, has launched small RNA sequencing (RNASeq) into more frequent use. However, known biases associated with sm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29728066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4726-6 |
_version_ | 1783320380727885824 |
---|---|
author | Yeri, Ashish Courtright, Amanda Danielson, Kirsty Hutchins, Elizabeth Alsop, Eric Carlson, Elizabeth Hsieh, Michael Ziegler, Olivia Das, Avash Shah, Ravi V. Rozowsky, Joel Das, Saumya Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall |
author_facet | Yeri, Ashish Courtright, Amanda Danielson, Kirsty Hutchins, Elizabeth Alsop, Eric Carlson, Elizabeth Hsieh, Michael Ziegler, Olivia Das, Avash Shah, Ravi V. Rozowsky, Joel Das, Saumya Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall |
author_sort | Yeri, Ashish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evolving interest in comprehensively profiling the full range of small RNAs present in small tissue biopsies and in circulating biofluids, and how the profile differs with disease, has launched small RNA sequencing (RNASeq) into more frequent use. However, known biases associated with small RNASeq, compounded by low RNA inputs, have been both a significant concern and a hurdle to widespread adoption. As RNASeq is becoming a viable choice for the discovery of small RNAs in low input samples and more labs are employing it, there should be benchmark datasets to test and evaluate the performance of new sequencing protocols and operators. In a recent publication from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Pine et al., 2018, the investigators used a commercially available set of three tissues and tested performance across labs and platforms. RESULTS: In this paper, we further tested the performance of low RNA input in three commonly used and commercially available RNASeq library preparation kits; NEB Next, NEXTFlex, and TruSeq small RNA library preparation. We evaluated the performance of the kits at two different sites, using three different tissues (brain, liver, and placenta) with high (1 μg) and low RNA (10 ng) input from tissue samples, or 5.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.2 ml starting volumes of plasma. As there has been a lack of robust validation platforms for differentially expressed miRNAs, we also compared low input RNASeq data with their expression profiles on three different platforms (Abcam Fireplex, HTG EdgeSeq, and Qiagen miRNome). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance of RNASeq results on these three platforms was dependent on the RNA expression level; the higher the expression, the better the reproducibility. The results provide an extensive analysis of small RNASeq kit performance using low RNA input, and replication of these data on three downstream technologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4726-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5936030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59360302018-05-11 Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA Yeri, Ashish Courtright, Amanda Danielson, Kirsty Hutchins, Elizabeth Alsop, Eric Carlson, Elizabeth Hsieh, Michael Ziegler, Olivia Das, Avash Shah, Ravi V. Rozowsky, Joel Das, Saumya Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Evolving interest in comprehensively profiling the full range of small RNAs present in small tissue biopsies and in circulating biofluids, and how the profile differs with disease, has launched small RNA sequencing (RNASeq) into more frequent use. However, known biases associated with small RNASeq, compounded by low RNA inputs, have been both a significant concern and a hurdle to widespread adoption. As RNASeq is becoming a viable choice for the discovery of small RNAs in low input samples and more labs are employing it, there should be benchmark datasets to test and evaluate the performance of new sequencing protocols and operators. In a recent publication from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Pine et al., 2018, the investigators used a commercially available set of three tissues and tested performance across labs and platforms. RESULTS: In this paper, we further tested the performance of low RNA input in three commonly used and commercially available RNASeq library preparation kits; NEB Next, NEXTFlex, and TruSeq small RNA library preparation. We evaluated the performance of the kits at two different sites, using three different tissues (brain, liver, and placenta) with high (1 μg) and low RNA (10 ng) input from tissue samples, or 5.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.2 ml starting volumes of plasma. As there has been a lack of robust validation platforms for differentially expressed miRNAs, we also compared low input RNASeq data with their expression profiles on three different platforms (Abcam Fireplex, HTG EdgeSeq, and Qiagen miRNome). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance of RNASeq results on these three platforms was dependent on the RNA expression level; the higher the expression, the better the reproducibility. The results provide an extensive analysis of small RNASeq kit performance using low RNA input, and replication of these data on three downstream technologies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4726-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5936030/ /pubmed/29728066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4726-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Yeri, Ashish Courtright, Amanda Danielson, Kirsty Hutchins, Elizabeth Alsop, Eric Carlson, Elizabeth Hsieh, Michael Ziegler, Olivia Das, Avash Shah, Ravi V. Rozowsky, Joel Das, Saumya Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title | Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title_full | Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title_short | Evaluation of commercially available small RNASeq library preparation kits using low input RNA |
title_sort | evaluation of commercially available small rnaseq library preparation kits using low input rna |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29728066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4726-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeriashish evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT courtrightamanda evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT danielsonkirsty evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT hutchinselizabeth evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT alsoperic evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT carlsonelizabeth evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT hsiehmichael evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT zieglerolivia evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT dasavash evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT shahraviv evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT rozowskyjoel evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT dassaumya evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna AT vankeurenjensenkendall evaluationofcommerciallyavailablesmallrnaseqlibrarypreparationkitsusinglowinputrna |