Cargando…
Simpson’s Paradox: Examples
Simpson’s paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson’s paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.
Autores principales: | WANG, Bokai, WU, Pan, KWAN, Brian, TU, Xin M., FENG, Changyong |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736137 http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparisons of Superiority, Non-inferiority, and Equivalence Trials
por: WANG, Bokai, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Inconsistency between overall and subgroup analyses
por: Wang, Hongyue, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis
por: FENG, Ge, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Sample sizes based on three popular indices of risks
por: Wang, Hongyue, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The p-value and model specification in statistics
por: Wang, Bokai, et al.
Publicado: (2019)