Cargando…

Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions

BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Luke, Jeffries, Owen, Waldron, Mark, Rosenblatt, Ben, Gissane, Conor, Paton, Bruce, Patterson, Stephen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736337
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697
_version_ 1783320388995907584
author Hughes, Luke
Jeffries, Owen
Waldron, Mark
Rosenblatt, Ben
Gissane, Conor
Paton, Bruce
Patterson, Stephen D.
author_facet Hughes, Luke
Jeffries, Owen
Waldron, Mark
Rosenblatt, Ben
Gissane, Conor
Paton, Bruce
Patterson, Stephen D.
author_sort Hughes, Luke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. METHODS: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the Delfi Personalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. RESULTS: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5936068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59360682018-05-07 Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions Hughes, Luke Jeffries, Owen Waldron, Mark Rosenblatt, Ben Gissane, Conor Paton, Bruce Patterson, Stephen D. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. METHODS: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the Delfi Personalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. RESULTS: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion. PeerJ Inc. 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5936068/ /pubmed/29736337 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697 Text en © 2018 Hughes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Hughes, Luke
Jeffries, Owen
Waldron, Mark
Rosenblatt, Ben
Gissane, Conor
Paton, Bruce
Patterson, Stephen D.
Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title_full Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title_fullStr Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title_full_unstemmed Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title_short Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
title_sort influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736337
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesluke influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT jeffriesowen influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT waldronmark influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT rosenblattben influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT gissaneconor influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT patonbruce influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions
AT pattersonstephend influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions