Cargando…
Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions
BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736337 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697 |
_version_ | 1783320388995907584 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, Luke Jeffries, Owen Waldron, Mark Rosenblatt, Ben Gissane, Conor Paton, Bruce Patterson, Stephen D. |
author_facet | Hughes, Luke Jeffries, Owen Waldron, Mark Rosenblatt, Ben Gissane, Conor Paton, Bruce Patterson, Stephen D. |
author_sort | Hughes, Luke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. METHODS: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the Delfi Personalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. RESULTS: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5936068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59360682018-05-07 Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions Hughes, Luke Jeffries, Owen Waldron, Mark Rosenblatt, Ben Gissane, Conor Paton, Bruce Patterson, Stephen D. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Total arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) is used to prescribe pressures for surgery, blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). AOP is often measured in a supine position; however, the influence of body position on AOP measurement is unknown and may influence level of occlusion in different positions during BFR and IPC. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of body position on AOP. METHODS: Fifty healthy individuals (age = 29 ± 6 y) underwent AOP measurements on the dominant lower-limb in supine, seated and standing positions in a randomised order. AOP was measured automatically using the Delfi Personalised Tourniquet System device, with each measurement separated by 5 min of rest. RESULTS: Arterial occlusive pressure was significantly lower in the supine position compared to the seated position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and standing position (187.00 ± 32.5 vs 241.50 ± 49.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). AOP was significantly higher in the standing position compared to the seated position (241.50 ± 49.3 vs 204.00 ± 28.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Arterial occlusive pressure measurement is body position dependent, thus for accurate prescription of occlusion pressure during surgery, BFR and IPC, AOP should be measured in the position intended for subsequent application of occlusion. PeerJ Inc. 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5936068/ /pubmed/29736337 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697 Text en © 2018 Hughes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anatomy and Physiology Hughes, Luke Jeffries, Owen Waldron, Mark Rosenblatt, Ben Gissane, Conor Paton, Bruce Patterson, Stephen D. Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title | Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title_full | Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title_fullStr | Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title_short | Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
title_sort | influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions |
topic | Anatomy and Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736337 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hughesluke influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT jeffriesowen influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT waldronmark influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT rosenblattben influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT gissaneconor influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT patonbruce influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions AT pattersonstephend influenceandreliabilityoflowerlimbarterialocclusionpressureatdifferentbodypositions |