Cargando…
Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors
In today’s world of work, networking behaviors are an important and viable strategy to enhance success in work and career domains. Concerning personality as an antecedent of networking behaviors, prior studies have exclusively relied on trait perspectives that focus on how people feel, think, and ac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00411 |
_version_ | 1783320516763844608 |
---|---|
author | Wolff, Hans-Georg Weikamp, Julia G. Batinic, Bernad |
author_facet | Wolff, Hans-Georg Weikamp, Julia G. Batinic, Bernad |
author_sort | Wolff, Hans-Georg |
collection | PubMed |
description | In today’s world of work, networking behaviors are an important and viable strategy to enhance success in work and career domains. Concerning personality as an antecedent of networking behaviors, prior studies have exclusively relied on trait perspectives that focus on how people feel, think, and act. Adopting a motivational perspective on personality, we enlarge this focus and argue that beyond traits predominantly tapping social content, motives shed further light on instrumental aspects of networking – or why people network. We use McClelland’s implicit motives framework of need for power (nPow), need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff) to examine instrumental determinants of networking. Using a facet theoretical approach to networking behaviors, we predict differential relations of these three motives with facets of (1) internal vs. external networking and (2) building, maintaining, and using contacts. We conducted an online study, in which we temporally separate measures (N = 539 employed individuals) to examine our hypotheses. Using multivariate latent regression, we show that nAch is related to networking in general. In line with theoretical differences between networking facets, we find that nAff is positively related to building contacts, whereas nPow is positively related to using internal contacts. In sum, this study shows that networking is not only driven by social factors (i.e., nAff), but instead the achievement motive is the most important driver of networking behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5936778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59367782018-05-14 Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors Wolff, Hans-Georg Weikamp, Julia G. Batinic, Bernad Front Psychol Psychology In today’s world of work, networking behaviors are an important and viable strategy to enhance success in work and career domains. Concerning personality as an antecedent of networking behaviors, prior studies have exclusively relied on trait perspectives that focus on how people feel, think, and act. Adopting a motivational perspective on personality, we enlarge this focus and argue that beyond traits predominantly tapping social content, motives shed further light on instrumental aspects of networking – or why people network. We use McClelland’s implicit motives framework of need for power (nPow), need for achievement (nAch), and need for affiliation (nAff) to examine instrumental determinants of networking. Using a facet theoretical approach to networking behaviors, we predict differential relations of these three motives with facets of (1) internal vs. external networking and (2) building, maintaining, and using contacts. We conducted an online study, in which we temporally separate measures (N = 539 employed individuals) to examine our hypotheses. Using multivariate latent regression, we show that nAch is related to networking in general. In line with theoretical differences between networking facets, we find that nAff is positively related to building contacts, whereas nPow is positively related to using internal contacts. In sum, this study shows that networking is not only driven by social factors (i.e., nAff), but instead the achievement motive is the most important driver of networking behaviors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5936778/ /pubmed/29760668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00411 Text en Copyright © 2018 Wolff, Weikamp and Batinic. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wolff, Hans-Georg Weikamp, Julia G. Batinic, Bernad Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title | Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title_full | Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title_fullStr | Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title_full_unstemmed | Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title_short | Implicit Motives as Determinants of Networking Behaviors |
title_sort | implicit motives as determinants of networking behaviors |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffhansgeorg implicitmotivesasdeterminantsofnetworkingbehaviors AT weikampjuliag implicitmotivesasdeterminantsofnetworkingbehaviors AT batinicbernad implicitmotivesasdeterminantsofnetworkingbehaviors |