Cargando…
Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states
How historical connections, events and cultural proximity can influence human development is being increasingly recognized. One aspect of history that has only recently begun to be examined is deep cultural ancestry, i.e. the vertical relationships of descent between cultures, which can be represent...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29765628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171411 |
_version_ | 1783320533485486080 |
---|---|
author | Sookias, Roland B. Passmore, Samuel Atkinson, Quentin D. |
author_facet | Sookias, Roland B. Passmore, Samuel Atkinson, Quentin D. |
author_sort | Sookias, Roland B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | How historical connections, events and cultural proximity can influence human development is being increasingly recognized. One aspect of history that has only recently begun to be examined is deep cultural ancestry, i.e. the vertical relationships of descent between cultures, which can be represented by a phylogenetic tree of descent. Here, we test whether deep cultural ancestry predicts the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) for 44 Eurasian countries, using language ancestry as a proxy for cultural relatedness and controlling for three additional factors—geographical proximity, religion and former communism. While cultural ancestry alone predicts HDI and its subcomponents (income, health and education indices), when geographical proximity is included only income and health indices remain significant and the effect is small. When communism and religion variables are included, cultural ancestry is no longer a significant predictor; communism significantly negatively predicts HDI, income and health indices, and Muslim percentage of the population significantly negatively predicts education index, although the latter result may not be robust. These findings indicate that geographical proximity and recent cultural history—especially communism—are more important than deep cultural factors in current human development and suggest the efficacy of modern policy initiatives is not tightly constrained by cultural ancestry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5936893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59368932018-05-15 Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states Sookias, Roland B. Passmore, Samuel Atkinson, Quentin D. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) How historical connections, events and cultural proximity can influence human development is being increasingly recognized. One aspect of history that has only recently begun to be examined is deep cultural ancestry, i.e. the vertical relationships of descent between cultures, which can be represented by a phylogenetic tree of descent. Here, we test whether deep cultural ancestry predicts the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) for 44 Eurasian countries, using language ancestry as a proxy for cultural relatedness and controlling for three additional factors—geographical proximity, religion and former communism. While cultural ancestry alone predicts HDI and its subcomponents (income, health and education indices), when geographical proximity is included only income and health indices remain significant and the effect is small. When communism and religion variables are included, cultural ancestry is no longer a significant predictor; communism significantly negatively predicts HDI, income and health indices, and Muslim percentage of the population significantly negatively predicts education index, although the latter result may not be robust. These findings indicate that geographical proximity and recent cultural history—especially communism—are more important than deep cultural factors in current human development and suggest the efficacy of modern policy initiatives is not tightly constrained by cultural ancestry. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5936893/ /pubmed/29765628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171411 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Sookias, Roland B. Passmore, Samuel Atkinson, Quentin D. Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title | Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title_full | Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title_fullStr | Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title_short | Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
title_sort | deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29765628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sookiasrolandb deepculturalancestryandhumandevelopmentindicatorsacrossnationstates AT passmoresamuel deepculturalancestryandhumandevelopmentindicatorsacrossnationstates AT atkinsonquentind deepculturalancestryandhumandevelopmentindicatorsacrossnationstates |