Cargando…
Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8 |
_version_ | 1783320563941376000 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, Paul Therriault, Patricia-Ann Katz, Ira |
author_facet | Edwards, Paul Therriault, Patricia-Ann Katz, Ira |
author_sort | Edwards, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable to commercially produced MA. The question to be addressed in this paper is how to assess if a lack of purity poses a medical problem? METHODS: The MA produced onsite at a major Canadian hospital was monitored for carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and other impurity gases at high frequency (one per minute) over a two-month period. RESULTS: The average CO(2) concentration was 255 ppm. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) threshold of 500 ppm was exceeded during 1% of the total study period, and the average while exceeding the threshold was 526 ppm. The maximum concentration was 634 ppm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, there is only one study that evaluated the effects suffered by respiratory patients of elevated nitric oxide in MA; thus, it is not clear what are the medical bases for the thresholds stated in the USP. To perform a Quality Risk Assessment, the threshold and the time above threshold should be considered in determining the frequency of sampling and analysis, and operating methods required to ensure the quality of MA entering the pipeline meets the clinical, regulatory, and patient safety standards. In conclusion, because the USP does not provide impurity thresholds for specific patients nor time above thresholds, there is a need for the medical community to determine these quantities before it can be known if the purity of MA is a problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5937034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59370342018-05-14 Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? Edwards, Paul Therriault, Patricia-Ann Katz, Ira Multidiscip Respir Med Short Report INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable to commercially produced MA. The question to be addressed in this paper is how to assess if a lack of purity poses a medical problem? METHODS: The MA produced onsite at a major Canadian hospital was monitored for carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and other impurity gases at high frequency (one per minute) over a two-month period. RESULTS: The average CO(2) concentration was 255 ppm. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) threshold of 500 ppm was exceeded during 1% of the total study period, and the average while exceeding the threshold was 526 ppm. The maximum concentration was 634 ppm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, there is only one study that evaluated the effects suffered by respiratory patients of elevated nitric oxide in MA; thus, it is not clear what are the medical bases for the thresholds stated in the USP. To perform a Quality Risk Assessment, the threshold and the time above threshold should be considered in determining the frequency of sampling and analysis, and operating methods required to ensure the quality of MA entering the pipeline meets the clinical, regulatory, and patient safety standards. In conclusion, because the USP does not provide impurity thresholds for specific patients nor time above thresholds, there is a need for the medical community to determine these quantities before it can be known if the purity of MA is a problem. BioMed Central 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5937034/ /pubmed/29760915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Edwards, Paul Therriault, Patricia-Ann Katz, Ira Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title | Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title_full | Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title_fullStr | Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title_full_unstemmed | Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title_short | Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
title_sort | onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardspaul onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem AT therriaultpatriciaann onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem AT katzira onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem |