Cargando…

Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?

INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Paul, Therriault, Patricia-Ann, Katz, Ira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8
_version_ 1783320563941376000
author Edwards, Paul
Therriault, Patricia-Ann
Katz, Ira
author_facet Edwards, Paul
Therriault, Patricia-Ann
Katz, Ira
author_sort Edwards, Paul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable to commercially produced MA. The question to be addressed in this paper is how to assess if a lack of purity poses a medical problem? METHODS: The MA produced onsite at a major Canadian hospital was monitored for carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and other impurity gases at high frequency (one per minute) over a two-month period. RESULTS: The average CO(2) concentration was 255 ppm. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) threshold of 500 ppm was exceeded during 1% of the total study period, and the average while exceeding the threshold was 526 ppm. The maximum concentration was 634 ppm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, there is only one study that evaluated the effects suffered by respiratory patients of elevated nitric oxide in MA; thus, it is not clear what are the medical bases for the thresholds stated in the USP. To perform a Quality Risk Assessment, the threshold and the time above threshold should be considered in determining the frequency of sampling and analysis, and operating methods required to ensure the quality of MA entering the pipeline meets the clinical, regulatory, and patient safety standards. In conclusion, because the USP does not provide impurity thresholds for specific patients nor time above thresholds, there is a need for the medical community to determine these quantities before it can be known if the purity of MA is a problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5937034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59370342018-05-14 Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem? Edwards, Paul Therriault, Patricia-Ann Katz, Ira Multidiscip Respir Med Short Report INTRODUCTION: Medical air (MA) is widely used in hospitals, often manufactured onsite by compressing external ambient air and supplied through a local network piping system. Onsite production gives rise to a risk of impurities that are governed by the same pharmacopoeia purity standards applicable to commercially produced MA. The question to be addressed in this paper is how to assess if a lack of purity poses a medical problem? METHODS: The MA produced onsite at a major Canadian hospital was monitored for carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and other impurity gases at high frequency (one per minute) over a two-month period. RESULTS: The average CO(2) concentration was 255 ppm. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) threshold of 500 ppm was exceeded during 1% of the total study period, and the average while exceeding the threshold was 526 ppm. The maximum concentration was 634 ppm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, there is only one study that evaluated the effects suffered by respiratory patients of elevated nitric oxide in MA; thus, it is not clear what are the medical bases for the thresholds stated in the USP. To perform a Quality Risk Assessment, the threshold and the time above threshold should be considered in determining the frequency of sampling and analysis, and operating methods required to ensure the quality of MA entering the pipeline meets the clinical, regulatory, and patient safety standards. In conclusion, because the USP does not provide impurity thresholds for specific patients nor time above thresholds, there is a need for the medical community to determine these quantities before it can be known if the purity of MA is a problem. BioMed Central 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5937034/ /pubmed/29760915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Edwards, Paul
Therriault, Patricia-Ann
Katz, Ira
Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title_full Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title_fullStr Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title_full_unstemmed Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title_short Onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
title_sort onsite production of medical air: is purity a problem?
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0125-8
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardspaul onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem
AT therriaultpatriciaann onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem
AT katzira onsiteproductionofmedicalairispurityaproblem