Cargando…
Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature
BACKGROUND: Robertsonian translocations (RobT) are common structural chromosome rearrangements where carriers display a majority of chromosomally balanced spermatozoa from alternate segregation mode. According to some monotony observed in the rates of balanced segregation, is sperm FISH analysis obs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-018-0069-z |
_version_ | 1783320567057743872 |
---|---|
author | Lamotte, Anna Martinez, Guillaume Devillard, Françoise Hograindleur, Jean-Pascal Satre, Véronique Coutton, Charles Harbuz, Radu Amblard, Florence Lespinasse, James Benchaib, Mehdi Bessonnat, Julien Brouillet, Sophie Hennebicq, Sylviane |
author_facet | Lamotte, Anna Martinez, Guillaume Devillard, Françoise Hograindleur, Jean-Pascal Satre, Véronique Coutton, Charles Harbuz, Radu Amblard, Florence Lespinasse, James Benchaib, Mehdi Bessonnat, Julien Brouillet, Sophie Hennebicq, Sylviane |
author_sort | Lamotte, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robertsonian translocations (RobT) are common structural chromosome rearrangements where carriers display a majority of chromosomally balanced spermatozoa from alternate segregation mode. According to some monotony observed in the rates of balanced segregation, is sperm FISH analysis obsolete for RobT carriers? METHODS: Retrospective cohort research study on 23 patients analyzed in our center from 2003 to 2017 and compared to the data of 187 patients in literature from 1983 to 2017. Robertsonian translocation carriers were divided in six groups according to the chromosomes involved in the translocation: 9 patients from our center and 107 from literature carrying 45,XY,der(13;14) karyotype, 3 and 35 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;21), 5 and 11 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(13;15), 4 and 7 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;15), 1 and 4 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(13;22),and 1 and 10 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;22). RESULTS: Alternate segregation mode is predominant in our group of Robertsonian translocation carriers with 73.45% ±8.05 of balanced spermatozoa (min 50.92%; max 89.99%). These results are compliant with the data from literature for all translocations types (p > 0.05) and are consistent among the different types of Robertsonian translocations (p > 0.05) except for der(13;15) that exhibit lower balanced spermatozoa rates (p < 0.05 versus der(13;14), der(14;21), (13;21) and der(15;22)). Normozoospermic patients also display a significantly (p < 0.01) higher rate of balanced sperm cells than patients with abnormal seminograms whatever the defect implied. CONCLUSIONS: According to the discrepancies observed between der(13;15) and all the other Rob T carriers, the differences observed among patients presenting normal and abnormal sperm parameters and the input in genetical counselling, sperm FISH does not seem obsolete for these patients. Moreover, it seems important to collect more data for rare RobT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5937048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59370482018-05-14 Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature Lamotte, Anna Martinez, Guillaume Devillard, Françoise Hograindleur, Jean-Pascal Satre, Véronique Coutton, Charles Harbuz, Radu Amblard, Florence Lespinasse, James Benchaib, Mehdi Bessonnat, Julien Brouillet, Sophie Hennebicq, Sylviane Basic Clin Androl Research Article BACKGROUND: Robertsonian translocations (RobT) are common structural chromosome rearrangements where carriers display a majority of chromosomally balanced spermatozoa from alternate segregation mode. According to some monotony observed in the rates of balanced segregation, is sperm FISH analysis obsolete for RobT carriers? METHODS: Retrospective cohort research study on 23 patients analyzed in our center from 2003 to 2017 and compared to the data of 187 patients in literature from 1983 to 2017. Robertsonian translocation carriers were divided in six groups according to the chromosomes involved in the translocation: 9 patients from our center and 107 from literature carrying 45,XY,der(13;14) karyotype, 3 and 35 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;21), 5 and 11 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(13;15), 4 and 7 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;15), 1 and 4 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(13;22),and 1 and 10 patients respectively with 45,XY,der(14;22). RESULTS: Alternate segregation mode is predominant in our group of Robertsonian translocation carriers with 73.45% ±8.05 of balanced spermatozoa (min 50.92%; max 89.99%). These results are compliant with the data from literature for all translocations types (p > 0.05) and are consistent among the different types of Robertsonian translocations (p > 0.05) except for der(13;15) that exhibit lower balanced spermatozoa rates (p < 0.05 versus der(13;14), der(14;21), (13;21) and der(15;22)). Normozoospermic patients also display a significantly (p < 0.01) higher rate of balanced sperm cells than patients with abnormal seminograms whatever the defect implied. CONCLUSIONS: According to the discrepancies observed between der(13;15) and all the other Rob T carriers, the differences observed among patients presenting normal and abnormal sperm parameters and the input in genetical counselling, sperm FISH does not seem obsolete for these patients. Moreover, it seems important to collect more data for rare RobT. BioMed Central 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5937048/ /pubmed/29760927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-018-0069-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lamotte, Anna Martinez, Guillaume Devillard, Françoise Hograindleur, Jean-Pascal Satre, Véronique Coutton, Charles Harbuz, Radu Amblard, Florence Lespinasse, James Benchaib, Mehdi Bessonnat, Julien Brouillet, Sophie Hennebicq, Sylviane Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title | Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title_full | Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title_short | Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
title_sort | is sperm fish analysis still useful for robertsonian translocations? meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-018-0069-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamotteanna isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT martinezguillaume isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT devillardfrancoise isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT hograindleurjeanpascal isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT satreveronique isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT couttoncharles isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT harbuzradu isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT amblardflorence isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT lespinassejames isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT benchaibmehdi isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT bessonnatjulien isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT brouilletsophie isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature AT hennebicqsylviane isspermfishanalysisstillusefulforrobertsoniantranslocationsmeioticanalysisfor23patientsandreviewoftheliterature |