Cargando…

In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast

BACKGROUND: Augmentation mammoplasty remains the most common cosmetic surgery procedure performed. The objective of this article is to evaluate the impact of augmented volume of the reconstructed breast in patients that undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy and patients previously augmented who undergo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Amanda L., Tugertimur, Bugra, Smith, Paul D., Kumar, Ambuj, Dayicioglu, Deniz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274817729064
_version_ 1783320594656264192
author Zimmerman, Amanda L.
Tugertimur, Bugra
Smith, Paul D.
Kumar, Ambuj
Dayicioglu, Deniz
author_facet Zimmerman, Amanda L.
Tugertimur, Bugra
Smith, Paul D.
Kumar, Ambuj
Dayicioglu, Deniz
author_sort Zimmerman, Amanda L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Augmentation mammoplasty remains the most common cosmetic surgery procedure performed. The objective of this article is to evaluate the impact of augmented volume of the reconstructed breast in patients that undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy and patients previously augmented who undergo mastectomy with tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, and mastectomy after previous augmentation followed by tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction between June 2011 and April 2015 by 2 surgeons at the same institution were included. Retrospective chart review of the patients identified using these criteria was performed to record patient characteristics, complications, breast volume, implant volume, and percentage change in volume at the time of reconstruction. Percentage change of breast volume was calculated using the formula (implant breast weight)/(breast weight) for skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy patients and (final breast implant weight − [breast weight + augmentation breast implant weight])/([breast weight + augmentation breast implant]) for patients undergoing mastectomy following previous augmentation. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were included in the study with 63 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 166 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy, and 64 patients who underwent previous augmentation with subsequent mastectomy. Mean percentage change in breast volume was 66% in the nipple-sparing mastectomy group, 15% for the right breast and 18% for the left breast in the skin-sparing mastectomy group, and 81% for the right breast and 72% for the left breast in the mastectomy following previous augmentation group. Complication rate for nipple-sparing mastectomy was 27%, mastectomy following previous augmentation was 20.3%, and skin-sparing mastectomy group was 18.7%. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy or mastectomy following previous augmentation have the ability to achieve greater volume in their reconstructed breast via tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5937240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59372402018-05-16 In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast Zimmerman, Amanda L. Tugertimur, Bugra Smith, Paul D. Kumar, Ambuj Dayicioglu, Deniz Cancer Control Original Research BACKGROUND: Augmentation mammoplasty remains the most common cosmetic surgery procedure performed. The objective of this article is to evaluate the impact of augmented volume of the reconstructed breast in patients that undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy and patients previously augmented who undergo mastectomy with tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, and mastectomy after previous augmentation followed by tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction between June 2011 and April 2015 by 2 surgeons at the same institution were included. Retrospective chart review of the patients identified using these criteria was performed to record patient characteristics, complications, breast volume, implant volume, and percentage change in volume at the time of reconstruction. Percentage change of breast volume was calculated using the formula (implant breast weight)/(breast weight) for skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy patients and (final breast implant weight − [breast weight + augmentation breast implant weight])/([breast weight + augmentation breast implant]) for patients undergoing mastectomy following previous augmentation. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were included in the study with 63 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 166 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy, and 64 patients who underwent previous augmentation with subsequent mastectomy. Mean percentage change in breast volume was 66% in the nipple-sparing mastectomy group, 15% for the right breast and 18% for the left breast in the skin-sparing mastectomy group, and 81% for the right breast and 72% for the left breast in the mastectomy following previous augmentation group. Complication rate for nipple-sparing mastectomy was 27%, mastectomy following previous augmentation was 20.3%, and skin-sparing mastectomy group was 18.7%. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy or mastectomy following previous augmentation have the ability to achieve greater volume in their reconstructed breast via tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5937240/ /pubmed/28975840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274817729064 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zimmerman, Amanda L.
Tugertimur, Bugra
Smith, Paul D.
Kumar, Ambuj
Dayicioglu, Deniz
In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title_full In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title_fullStr In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title_full_unstemmed In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title_short In the Age of Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction Provides an Opportunity to Augment the Breast
title_sort in the age of breast augmentation, breast reconstruction provides an opportunity to augment the breast
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274817729064
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermanamandal intheageofbreastaugmentationbreastreconstructionprovidesanopportunitytoaugmentthebreast
AT tugertimurbugra intheageofbreastaugmentationbreastreconstructionprovidesanopportunitytoaugmentthebreast
AT smithpauld intheageofbreastaugmentationbreastreconstructionprovidesanopportunitytoaugmentthebreast
AT kumarambuj intheageofbreastaugmentationbreastreconstructionprovidesanopportunitytoaugmentthebreast
AT dayiciogludeniz intheageofbreastaugmentationbreastreconstructionprovidesanopportunitytoaugmentthebreast