Cargando…

Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients

BACKGROUND: Objective evaluation of the physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. We validated a triaxial accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA-750C® (HJA), and evaluated the necessary conditions for obtaining reproducible data. METHODS: The PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyamoto, Seiko, Minakata, Yoshiaki, Azuma, Yuichiro, Kawabe, Kazumi, Ono, Hideya, Yanagimoto, Ryuta, Suruda, Tadatoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8343705
_version_ 1783320649658269696
author Miyamoto, Seiko
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Azuma, Yuichiro
Kawabe, Kazumi
Ono, Hideya
Yanagimoto, Ryuta
Suruda, Tadatoshi
author_facet Miyamoto, Seiko
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Azuma, Yuichiro
Kawabe, Kazumi
Ono, Hideya
Yanagimoto, Ryuta
Suruda, Tadatoshi
author_sort Miyamoto, Seiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Objective evaluation of the physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. We validated a triaxial accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA-750C® (HJA), and evaluated the necessary conditions for obtaining reproducible data. METHODS: The PA measured by HJA was compared with that measured by two already validated accelerometers in 11 patients with COPD (age: 76.6 ± 6.9, FEV1% predicted: 57.6 ± 18.6). Then, the influence of weather and holidays on the PA and the required number of days to obtain repeatability were examined in 21 patients with COPD (age: 73.0 ± 8.0, FEV1% predicted: 58.7 ± 19.0). RESULTS: The PA values measured by HJA and those by DynaPort Move Monitor® (DMM) or Actimarker® (AM) were significantly correlated at all intensities (p=0.024 at ≥4.0 METs by DMM and p < 0.0001 at the rest) except at ≥4.0 METs by AM, though the values measured by HJA were higher than those by AM which was reported to underestimate PA. The durations of PA on rainy days were significantly shorter than those on nonrainy days, but those on holidays were not different from those on weekdays. The values of ICC for 3, 4, or 5 days were higher than 0.8 at all intensities. The PA measured by HJA was correlated with the dyspnea scale FVC and age and tended to correlate with FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: The HJA was validated for evaluating the PA in patients with COPD. This trial is registered with UMIN000016363.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5937578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59375782018-05-30 Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients Miyamoto, Seiko Minakata, Yoshiaki Azuma, Yuichiro Kawabe, Kazumi Ono, Hideya Yanagimoto, Ryuta Suruda, Tadatoshi Can Respir J Research Article BACKGROUND: Objective evaluation of the physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. We validated a triaxial accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA-750C® (HJA), and evaluated the necessary conditions for obtaining reproducible data. METHODS: The PA measured by HJA was compared with that measured by two already validated accelerometers in 11 patients with COPD (age: 76.6 ± 6.9, FEV1% predicted: 57.6 ± 18.6). Then, the influence of weather and holidays on the PA and the required number of days to obtain repeatability were examined in 21 patients with COPD (age: 73.0 ± 8.0, FEV1% predicted: 58.7 ± 19.0). RESULTS: The PA values measured by HJA and those by DynaPort Move Monitor® (DMM) or Actimarker® (AM) were significantly correlated at all intensities (p=0.024 at ≥4.0 METs by DMM and p < 0.0001 at the rest) except at ≥4.0 METs by AM, though the values measured by HJA were higher than those by AM which was reported to underestimate PA. The durations of PA on rainy days were significantly shorter than those on nonrainy days, but those on holidays were not different from those on weekdays. The values of ICC for 3, 4, or 5 days were higher than 0.8 at all intensities. The PA measured by HJA was correlated with the dyspnea scale FVC and age and tended to correlate with FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: The HJA was validated for evaluating the PA in patients with COPD. This trial is registered with UMIN000016363. Hindawi 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5937578/ /pubmed/29849834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8343705 Text en Copyright © 2018 Seiko Miyamoto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miyamoto, Seiko
Minakata, Yoshiaki
Azuma, Yuichiro
Kawabe, Kazumi
Ono, Hideya
Yanagimoto, Ryuta
Suruda, Tadatoshi
Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title_full Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title_fullStr Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title_full_unstemmed Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title_short Verification of a Motion Sensor for Evaluating Physical Activity in COPD Patients
title_sort verification of a motion sensor for evaluating physical activity in copd patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8343705
work_keys_str_mv AT miyamotoseiko verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT minakatayoshiaki verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT azumayuichiro verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT kawabekazumi verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT onohideya verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT yanagimotoryuta verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients
AT surudatadatoshi verificationofamotionsensorforevaluatingphysicalactivityincopdpatients