Cargando…
Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback
INTRODUCTION: Intraoral scanners allow direct images of oral situation, with fewer steps than conventional impressions. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital impressions, traditional impressions, and digitalization of full-arch gypsum models, to evaluate timing of differen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4103232 |
_version_ | 1783320654310801408 |
---|---|
author | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Malfatto, Maurizio Di Corato, Francesco Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea |
author_facet | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Malfatto, Maurizio Di Corato, Francesco Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea |
author_sort | Sfondrini, Maria Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intraoral scanners allow direct images of oral situation, with fewer steps than conventional impressions. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital impressions, traditional impressions, and digitalization of full-arch gypsum models, to evaluate timing of different methods and finally to study perception of patients about conventional and digital impression techniques. METHODS: Dental arches of fourteen patients were evaluated by alginate impression, titanium dioxide powder-free intraoral scanning (Trios, 3Shape), and digitalization obtained from gypsum models using the same scanner. Conventional and digital techniques were evaluated through measurements (lower and upper arch anteroposterior length, lower and upper intercanine distance, and lower and upper intermolar distance) with a caliber for analogic models and using a computer software for digital models (Ortho Analyzer, Great Lakes Orthodontics). In addition, chairside and processing times were recorded. Finally, each patient completed a VAS questionnaire to evaluate comfort. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey tests for accuracy measurements and paired t-test for times and VAS scores. Significance was predetermined at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The measurements obtained with intraoral scanning, gypsum models after conventional impression, and digitalized gypsum models were not significantly different. Both chairside and processing times of digital scanning were shorter than the traditional method. VAS reporting patients comfort were significantly higher when evaluating digital impression. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral scanners used for orthodontic applications provide useful data in clinical practice, comparable to conventional impression. This technology is more time efficient than traditional impression and comfortable for patients. Further evolution with more accurate and faster scanners could in future replace traditional impression methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5937598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59375982018-05-30 Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Malfatto, Maurizio Di Corato, Francesco Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Intraoral scanners allow direct images of oral situation, with fewer steps than conventional impressions. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital impressions, traditional impressions, and digitalization of full-arch gypsum models, to evaluate timing of different methods and finally to study perception of patients about conventional and digital impression techniques. METHODS: Dental arches of fourteen patients were evaluated by alginate impression, titanium dioxide powder-free intraoral scanning (Trios, 3Shape), and digitalization obtained from gypsum models using the same scanner. Conventional and digital techniques were evaluated through measurements (lower and upper arch anteroposterior length, lower and upper intercanine distance, and lower and upper intermolar distance) with a caliber for analogic models and using a computer software for digital models (Ortho Analyzer, Great Lakes Orthodontics). In addition, chairside and processing times were recorded. Finally, each patient completed a VAS questionnaire to evaluate comfort. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey tests for accuracy measurements and paired t-test for times and VAS scores. Significance was predetermined at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The measurements obtained with intraoral scanning, gypsum models after conventional impression, and digitalized gypsum models were not significantly different. Both chairside and processing times of digital scanning were shorter than the traditional method. VAS reporting patients comfort were significantly higher when evaluating digital impression. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral scanners used for orthodontic applications provide useful data in clinical practice, comparable to conventional impression. This technology is more time efficient than traditional impression and comfortable for patients. Further evolution with more accurate and faster scanners could in future replace traditional impression methods. Hindawi 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5937598/ /pubmed/29850512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4103232 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maria Francesca Sfondrini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Gandini, Paola Malfatto, Maurizio Di Corato, Francesco Trovati, Federico Scribante, Andrea Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title | Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title_full | Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title_fullStr | Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title_short | Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback |
title_sort | computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4103232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sfondrinimariafrancesca computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback AT gandinipaola computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback AT malfattomaurizio computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback AT dicoratofrancesco computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback AT trovatifederico computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback AT scribanteandrea computerizedcastsfororthodonticpurposeusingpowderfreeintraoralscannersaccuracyexecutiontimeandpatientfeedback |