Cargando…
Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge
This study investigated the effect of the period of use and location of intraoral appliances on enamel surface loss. This randomized, single blind in situ study was conducted in 2 crossover phases based on the period of use, in which maxillary and mandibular appliances were simultaneously worn. Bovi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196557 |
_version_ | 1783320676686364672 |
---|---|
author | Santos, Natália Mello Jordão, Maísa Camillo Ionta, Franciny Querobim Mendonça, Fernanda Lyrio Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Oliveira, Thais Marchini Honório, Heitor Marques Cruvinel, Thiago Rios, Daniela |
author_facet | Santos, Natália Mello Jordão, Maísa Camillo Ionta, Franciny Querobim Mendonça, Fernanda Lyrio Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Oliveira, Thais Marchini Honório, Heitor Marques Cruvinel, Thiago Rios, Daniela |
author_sort | Santos, Natália Mello |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the effect of the period of use and location of intraoral appliances on enamel surface loss. This randomized, single blind in situ study was conducted in 2 crossover phases based on the period of use, in which maxillary and mandibular appliances were simultaneously worn. Bovine enamel blocks (n = 120) were randomly divided among the studied groups by surface hardness. In each phase, fifteen volunteers used one maxillary appliance and two mandibular appliances for 5 days. Erosive challenge was performed 4X/day by immersion in 0.01 M HCL for 2 minutes. In the continuous phase, the intraoral appliances were worn for 20 hours. In the intermittent phase the appliances were worn for 8 hours and 30 minutes. Enamel loss was determined profilometrically. The discomfort of use of the appliances were evaluated in a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test and chi-square test (p<0.05). The maxillary appliance promoted higher enamel loss compared to the mandibular one (p<0.001). Intermittent use of appliances resulted in similar enamel loss to the continuous one (p = 0.686). All volunteers preferred to use the maxillary appliance in an intermittent regimen. The intermittent use of maxillary appliance is a simplified reliable protocol appropriated for in situ erosion studies in enamel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5937767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59377672018-05-18 Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge Santos, Natália Mello Jordão, Maísa Camillo Ionta, Franciny Querobim Mendonça, Fernanda Lyrio Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Oliveira, Thais Marchini Honório, Heitor Marques Cruvinel, Thiago Rios, Daniela PLoS One Research Article This study investigated the effect of the period of use and location of intraoral appliances on enamel surface loss. This randomized, single blind in situ study was conducted in 2 crossover phases based on the period of use, in which maxillary and mandibular appliances were simultaneously worn. Bovine enamel blocks (n = 120) were randomly divided among the studied groups by surface hardness. In each phase, fifteen volunteers used one maxillary appliance and two mandibular appliances for 5 days. Erosive challenge was performed 4X/day by immersion in 0.01 M HCL for 2 minutes. In the continuous phase, the intraoral appliances were worn for 20 hours. In the intermittent phase the appliances were worn for 8 hours and 30 minutes. Enamel loss was determined profilometrically. The discomfort of use of the appliances were evaluated in a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test and chi-square test (p<0.05). The maxillary appliance promoted higher enamel loss compared to the mandibular one (p<0.001). Intermittent use of appliances resulted in similar enamel loss to the continuous one (p = 0.686). All volunteers preferred to use the maxillary appliance in an intermittent regimen. The intermittent use of maxillary appliance is a simplified reliable protocol appropriated for in situ erosion studies in enamel. Public Library of Science 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5937767/ /pubmed/29734362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196557 Text en © 2018 Santos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Santos, Natália Mello Jordão, Maísa Camillo Ionta, Franciny Querobim Mendonça, Fernanda Lyrio Di Leone, Camilla Cristina Lira Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo Oliveira, Thais Marchini Honório, Heitor Marques Cruvinel, Thiago Rios, Daniela Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title | Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title_full | Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title_fullStr | Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title_short | Impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
title_sort | impact of a simplified in situ protocol on enamel loss after erosive challenge |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santosnataliamello impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT jordaomaisacamillo impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT iontafrancinyquerobim impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT mendoncafernandalyrio impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT dileonecamillacristinalira impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT buzalafmariliaafonsorabelo impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT oliveirathaismarchini impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT honorioheitormarques impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT cruvinelthiago impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge AT riosdaniela impactofasimplifiedinsituprotocolonenamellossaftererosivechallenge |