Cargando…

Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions

BACKGROUND: The scanner does not measure the dental surface continually. Instead, it generates a point cloud, and these points are then joined to form the scanned object. This approximation will depend on the number of points generated (resolution), which can lead to low accuracy (trueness and preci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla, Pascual-Moscardó, Agustín, Camps, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750097
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54670
_version_ 1783320710430588928
author Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla
Pascual-Moscardó, Agustín
Camps, Isabel
author_facet Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla
Pascual-Moscardó, Agustín
Camps, Isabel
author_sort Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scanner does not measure the dental surface continually. Instead, it generates a point cloud, and these points are then joined to form the scanned object. This approximation will depend on the number of points generated (resolution), which can lead to low accuracy (trueness and precision) when fewer points are obtained. The purpose of this study is to determine the resolution of four intraoral digital imaging systems and to demonstrate the relationship between accuracy and resolution of the intraoral scanner in impressions of a complete dental arch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A master cast of the complete maxillary arch was prepared with different dental preparations. Using four digital impression systems, the cast was scanned inside of a black methacrylate box, obtaining a total of 40 digital impressions from each scanner. The resolution was obtained by dividing the number of points of each digital impression by the total surface area of the cast. Accuracy was evaluated using a three-dimensional measurement software, using the “best alignment” method of the casts with a highly faithful reference model obtained from an industrial scanner. Pearson correlation was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: Of the intraoral scanners, Omnicam is the system with the best resolution, with 79.82 points per mm2, followed by True Definition with 54.68 points per mm2, Trios with 41.21 points per mm2, and iTero with 34.20 points per mm2. However, the study found no relationship between resolution and accuracy of the study digital impression systems (P >0.05), except for Omnicam and its precision. CONCLUSIONS: The resolution of the digital impression systems has no relationship with the accuracy they achieve in the impression of a complete dental arch. The study found that the Omnicam scanner is the system that obtains the best resolution, and that as the resolution increases, its precision increases. Key words:Trueness, precision, accuracy, resolution, intraoral scanner, digital impression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5937957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59379572018-05-10 Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla Pascual-Moscardó, Agustín Camps, Isabel J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The scanner does not measure the dental surface continually. Instead, it generates a point cloud, and these points are then joined to form the scanned object. This approximation will depend on the number of points generated (resolution), which can lead to low accuracy (trueness and precision) when fewer points are obtained. The purpose of this study is to determine the resolution of four intraoral digital imaging systems and to demonstrate the relationship between accuracy and resolution of the intraoral scanner in impressions of a complete dental arch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A master cast of the complete maxillary arch was prepared with different dental preparations. Using four digital impression systems, the cast was scanned inside of a black methacrylate box, obtaining a total of 40 digital impressions from each scanner. The resolution was obtained by dividing the number of points of each digital impression by the total surface area of the cast. Accuracy was evaluated using a three-dimensional measurement software, using the “best alignment” method of the casts with a highly faithful reference model obtained from an industrial scanner. Pearson correlation was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: Of the intraoral scanners, Omnicam is the system with the best resolution, with 79.82 points per mm2, followed by True Definition with 54.68 points per mm2, Trios with 41.21 points per mm2, and iTero with 34.20 points per mm2. However, the study found no relationship between resolution and accuracy of the study digital impression systems (P >0.05), except for Omnicam and its precision. CONCLUSIONS: The resolution of the digital impression systems has no relationship with the accuracy they achieve in the impression of a complete dental arch. The study found that the Omnicam scanner is the system that obtains the best resolution, and that as the resolution increases, its precision increases. Key words:Trueness, precision, accuracy, resolution, intraoral scanner, digital impression. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5937957/ /pubmed/29750097 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54670 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla
Pascual-Moscardó, Agustín
Camps, Isabel
Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title_full Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title_fullStr Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title_short Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
title_sort relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750097
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54670
work_keys_str_mv AT medinasotomayorpriscilla relationshipbetweenresolutionandaccuracyoffourintraoralscannersincompletearchimpressions
AT pascualmoscardoagustin relationshipbetweenresolutionandaccuracyoffourintraoralscannersincompletearchimpressions
AT campsisabel relationshipbetweenresolutionandaccuracyoffourintraoralscannersincompletearchimpressions