Cargando…

Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans and fluoride release of a conventional glass ionomer (GI) contained natural and chemical agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten GI specimens were divided into ten groups (n=21) according to the con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elgamily, Hanaa, Ghallab, Omaima, El-Sayed, Hoda, Nasr, Maha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54606
_version_ 1783320711153057792
author Elgamily, Hanaa
Ghallab, Omaima
El-Sayed, Hoda
Nasr, Maha
author_facet Elgamily, Hanaa
Ghallab, Omaima
El-Sayed, Hoda
Nasr, Maha
author_sort Elgamily, Hanaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans and fluoride release of a conventional glass ionomer (GI) contained natural and chemical agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten GI specimens were divided into ten groups (n=21) according to the concentrations of the additives as; Propolis extract containing GI (Groups 1, 2, 3) with concentrations of 0.25%, 0.75% and 1.25% respectively, Miswak extract containing GI (Groups 4, 5, 6) and Chlorhexidine containing GI (Groups 7, 8, 9) with the same concentrations. The prepared specimens were subjected to antimicrobial activity by well diffusion, bacterial adherence, and fluoride release (from 2 to 72 hours) assessments. RESULTS: A higher statistically significant antibacterial activity was found in (Groups 2, 3) compared to (Groups 8, 9), while (Groups 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10) no antibacterial efficacy was reported. For (Groups 2, 3) had a higher statistically significant anti-adherence effect compared to the other tested groups. Enhanced ascending increase in fluoride release was observed for (Groups 3, 4) compared to (GI). CONCLUSIONS: The increased concentration of propolis extract had a synergistic effect on the antimicrobial activity of the tested GI. Additive concentrations of 0.25% Miswak and 1.25% propolis could enhance the fluoride-releasing ability of the tested GI. Key words:Propolis, miswak, chlorhexidine, glass ionomer, fluoride.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5937960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59379602018-05-10 Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study Elgamily, Hanaa Ghallab, Omaima El-Sayed, Hoda Nasr, Maha J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated the antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans and fluoride release of a conventional glass ionomer (GI) contained natural and chemical agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten GI specimens were divided into ten groups (n=21) according to the concentrations of the additives as; Propolis extract containing GI (Groups 1, 2, 3) with concentrations of 0.25%, 0.75% and 1.25% respectively, Miswak extract containing GI (Groups 4, 5, 6) and Chlorhexidine containing GI (Groups 7, 8, 9) with the same concentrations. The prepared specimens were subjected to antimicrobial activity by well diffusion, bacterial adherence, and fluoride release (from 2 to 72 hours) assessments. RESULTS: A higher statistically significant antibacterial activity was found in (Groups 2, 3) compared to (Groups 8, 9), while (Groups 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10) no antibacterial efficacy was reported. For (Groups 2, 3) had a higher statistically significant anti-adherence effect compared to the other tested groups. Enhanced ascending increase in fluoride release was observed for (Groups 3, 4) compared to (GI). CONCLUSIONS: The increased concentration of propolis extract had a synergistic effect on the antimicrobial activity of the tested GI. Additive concentrations of 0.25% Miswak and 1.25% propolis could enhance the fluoride-releasing ability of the tested GI. Key words:Propolis, miswak, chlorhexidine, glass ionomer, fluoride. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5937960/ /pubmed/29750090 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54606 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Elgamily, Hanaa
Ghallab, Omaima
El-Sayed, Hoda
Nasr, Maha
Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title_fullStr Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title_short Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study
title_sort antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: an in-vitro comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54606
work_keys_str_mv AT elgamilyhanaa antibacterialpotencyandfluoridereleaseofaglassionomerrestorativematerialcontainingdifferentconcentrationsofnaturalandchemicalproductsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT ghallabomaima antibacterialpotencyandfluoridereleaseofaglassionomerrestorativematerialcontainingdifferentconcentrationsofnaturalandchemicalproductsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT elsayedhoda antibacterialpotencyandfluoridereleaseofaglassionomerrestorativematerialcontainingdifferentconcentrationsofnaturalandchemicalproductsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT nasrmaha antibacterialpotencyandfluoridereleaseofaglassionomerrestorativematerialcontainingdifferentconcentrationsofnaturalandchemicalproductsaninvitrocomparativestudy