Cargando…

Bison body size and climate change

The relationship between body size and temperature of mammals is poorly resolved, especially for large keystone species such as bison (Bison bison). Bison are well represented in the fossil record across North America, which provides an opportunity to relate body size to climate within a species. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jeff M., Mead, Jim I., Barboza, Perry S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4019
_version_ 1783320784999022592
author Martin, Jeff M.
Mead, Jim I.
Barboza, Perry S.
author_facet Martin, Jeff M.
Mead, Jim I.
Barboza, Perry S.
author_sort Martin, Jeff M.
collection PubMed
description The relationship between body size and temperature of mammals is poorly resolved, especially for large keystone species such as bison (Bison bison). Bison are well represented in the fossil record across North America, which provides an opportunity to relate body size to climate within a species. We measured the length of a leg bone (calcaneal tuber, DstL) in 849 specimens from 60 localities that were dated by stratigraphy and (14)C decay. We estimated body mass (M) as M = (DstL/11.49)(3). Average annual temperature was estimated from δ(18)O values in the ice cores from Greenland. Calcaneal tuber length of Bison declined over the last 40,000 years, that is, average body mass was 37% larger (910 ± 50 kg) than today (665 ± 21 kg). Average annual temperature has warmed by 6°C since the Last Glacial Maximum (~24–18 kya) and is predicted to further increase by 4°C by the end of the 21st century. If body size continues to linearly respond to global temperature, Bison body mass will likely decline by an additional 46%, to 357 ± 54 kg, with an increase of 4°C globally. The rate of mass loss is 41 ± 10 kg per°C increase in global temperature. Changes in body size of Bison may be a result of migration, disease, or human harvest but those effects are likely to be local and short‐term and not likely to persist over the long time scale of the fossil record. The strong correspondence between body size of bison and air temperature is more likely the result of persistent effects on the ability to grow and the consequences of sustaining a large body mass in a warming environment. Continuing rises in global temperature will likely depress body sizes of bison, and perhaps other large grazers, without human intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5938452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59384522018-05-14 Bison body size and climate change Martin, Jeff M. Mead, Jim I. Barboza, Perry S. Ecol Evol Original Research The relationship between body size and temperature of mammals is poorly resolved, especially for large keystone species such as bison (Bison bison). Bison are well represented in the fossil record across North America, which provides an opportunity to relate body size to climate within a species. We measured the length of a leg bone (calcaneal tuber, DstL) in 849 specimens from 60 localities that were dated by stratigraphy and (14)C decay. We estimated body mass (M) as M = (DstL/11.49)(3). Average annual temperature was estimated from δ(18)O values in the ice cores from Greenland. Calcaneal tuber length of Bison declined over the last 40,000 years, that is, average body mass was 37% larger (910 ± 50 kg) than today (665 ± 21 kg). Average annual temperature has warmed by 6°C since the Last Glacial Maximum (~24–18 kya) and is predicted to further increase by 4°C by the end of the 21st century. If body size continues to linearly respond to global temperature, Bison body mass will likely decline by an additional 46%, to 357 ± 54 kg, with an increase of 4°C globally. The rate of mass loss is 41 ± 10 kg per°C increase in global temperature. Changes in body size of Bison may be a result of migration, disease, or human harvest but those effects are likely to be local and short‐term and not likely to persist over the long time scale of the fossil record. The strong correspondence between body size of bison and air temperature is more likely the result of persistent effects on the ability to grow and the consequences of sustaining a large body mass in a warming environment. Continuing rises in global temperature will likely depress body sizes of bison, and perhaps other large grazers, without human intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5938452/ /pubmed/29760897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4019 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Martin, Jeff M.
Mead, Jim I.
Barboza, Perry S.
Bison body size and climate change
title Bison body size and climate change
title_full Bison body size and climate change
title_fullStr Bison body size and climate change
title_full_unstemmed Bison body size and climate change
title_short Bison body size and climate change
title_sort bison body size and climate change
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4019
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjeffm bisonbodysizeandclimatechange
AT meadjimi bisonbodysizeandclimatechange
AT barbozaperrys bisonbodysizeandclimatechange