Cargando…
Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation?
The perception of danger represents an essential ability of prey for gaining an informational advantage over their natural enemies. Especially in complex environments or at night, animals strongly rely on chemoreception to avoid predators. The ability to recognize danger by chemical cues and subsequ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4000 |
_version_ | 1783320790103490560 |
---|---|
author | Šmejkal, Marek Ricard, Daniel Sajdlová, Zuzana Čech, Martin Vejřík, Lukáš Blabolil, Petr Vejříková, Ivana Prchalová, Marie Vašek, Mojmír Souza, Allan T. Brönmark, Christer Peterka, Jiří |
author_facet | Šmejkal, Marek Ricard, Daniel Sajdlová, Zuzana Čech, Martin Vejřík, Lukáš Blabolil, Petr Vejříková, Ivana Prchalová, Marie Vašek, Mojmír Souza, Allan T. Brönmark, Christer Peterka, Jiří |
author_sort | Šmejkal, Marek |
collection | PubMed |
description | The perception of danger represents an essential ability of prey for gaining an informational advantage over their natural enemies. Especially in complex environments or at night, animals strongly rely on chemoreception to avoid predators. The ability to recognize danger by chemical cues and subsequent adaptive responses to predation threats should generally increase prey survival. Recent findings suggest that European catfish (Silurus glanis) introduction induce changes in fish community and we tested whether the direction of change can be attributed to differences in chemical cue perception. We tested behavioral response to chemical cues using three species of freshwater fish common in European water: rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), roach (Rutilus rutilus), and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Further, we conducted a prey selectivity experiment to evaluate the prey preferences of the European catfish. Roach exhibited the strongest reaction to chemical cues, rudd decreased use of refuge and perch did not alter any behavior in the experiment. These findings suggest that chemical cue perception might be behind community data change and we encourage collecting more community data of tested prey species before and after European catfish introduction to test the hypothesis. We conclude that used prey species can be used as a model species to verify whether chemical cue perception enhances prey survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5938473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59384732018-05-14 Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? Šmejkal, Marek Ricard, Daniel Sajdlová, Zuzana Čech, Martin Vejřík, Lukáš Blabolil, Petr Vejříková, Ivana Prchalová, Marie Vašek, Mojmír Souza, Allan T. Brönmark, Christer Peterka, Jiří Ecol Evol Original Research The perception of danger represents an essential ability of prey for gaining an informational advantage over their natural enemies. Especially in complex environments or at night, animals strongly rely on chemoreception to avoid predators. The ability to recognize danger by chemical cues and subsequent adaptive responses to predation threats should generally increase prey survival. Recent findings suggest that European catfish (Silurus glanis) introduction induce changes in fish community and we tested whether the direction of change can be attributed to differences in chemical cue perception. We tested behavioral response to chemical cues using three species of freshwater fish common in European water: rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), roach (Rutilus rutilus), and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Further, we conducted a prey selectivity experiment to evaluate the prey preferences of the European catfish. Roach exhibited the strongest reaction to chemical cues, rudd decreased use of refuge and perch did not alter any behavior in the experiment. These findings suggest that chemical cue perception might be behind community data change and we encourage collecting more community data of tested prey species before and after European catfish introduction to test the hypothesis. We conclude that used prey species can be used as a model species to verify whether chemical cue perception enhances prey survival. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5938473/ /pubmed/29760895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4000 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Šmejkal, Marek Ricard, Daniel Sajdlová, Zuzana Čech, Martin Vejřík, Lukáš Blabolil, Petr Vejříková, Ivana Prchalová, Marie Vašek, Mojmír Souza, Allan T. Brönmark, Christer Peterka, Jiří Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title | Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title_full | Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title_fullStr | Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title_short | Can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
title_sort | can species‐specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smejkalmarek canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT ricarddaniel canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT sajdlovazuzana canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT cechmartin canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT vejriklukas canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT blabolilpetr canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT vejrikovaivana canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT prchalovamarie canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT vasekmojmir canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT souzaallant canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT bronmarkchrister canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation AT peterkajiri canspeciesspecificpreyresponsestochemicalcuesexplainpreysusceptibilitytopredation |