Cargando…

Surgical Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: the Gülhane Experience

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to report our experiences and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane between January 2012 and 2014. The patients’ pre-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akıncıoğlu, Dorukcan, Özge, Gökhan, Küçükevcilioğlu, Murat, Erdurman, Fazıl Cüneyt, Durukan, Ali Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755820
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.00334
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We aimed to report our experiences and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent vitreoretinal surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane between January 2012 and 2014. The patients’ pre- and postoperative visual acuity, slit-lamp examination findings, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes of 45 patients (36% male, 64% female) were included (mean age, 69±8.2 years). Mean postoperative follow-up time was 7±4 (1-12) months. The mean preoperative logMAR best corrected visual acuity was 0.58±0.32 and postoperatively 0.40±0.31, 0.33±0.33, 0.28±0.34 respectively at 3, 6, and 12 months. All OCT parameters showed statistically significant anatomical improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Correlation analysis showed that central macular thickness (r=0.69, p<0.05) and central macular volume (r=0.69, p<0.05) were the only parameters that had strong positive correlations with visual improvement. CONCLUSION: Epiretinal membrane causes heterogeneous anatomical changes in the macula for every patient. Therefore, a correlation between visual gain and changes in central macular thickness could not yet be demonstrated. We believe that central macular volume may be a better parameter for following these patients.