Cargando…

Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution

The gut microbiome is a community of host-associated symbiotic microbes that fulfills multiple key roles in host metabolism, immune function, and tissue development. Given the ability of the microbiome to impact host fitness, there is increasing interest in studying the microbiome of wild animals to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingala, Melissa R., Simmons, Nancy B., Wultsch, Claudia, Krampis, Konstantinos, Speer, Kelly A., Perkins, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29765359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00803
_version_ 1783320813314768896
author Ingala, Melissa R.
Simmons, Nancy B.
Wultsch, Claudia
Krampis, Konstantinos
Speer, Kelly A.
Perkins, Susan L.
author_facet Ingala, Melissa R.
Simmons, Nancy B.
Wultsch, Claudia
Krampis, Konstantinos
Speer, Kelly A.
Perkins, Susan L.
author_sort Ingala, Melissa R.
collection PubMed
description The gut microbiome is a community of host-associated symbiotic microbes that fulfills multiple key roles in host metabolism, immune function, and tissue development. Given the ability of the microbiome to impact host fitness, there is increasing interest in studying the microbiome of wild animals to better understand these communities in the context of host ecology and evolution. Human microbiome research protocols are well established, but wildlife microbiome research is still a developing field. Currently, there is no standardized set of best practices guiding the collection of microbiome samples from wildlife. Gut microflora are typically sampled either by fecal collection, rectal swabbing, or by destructively sampling the intestinal contents of the host animal. Studies rarely include more than one sampling technique and no comparison of these methods currently exists for a wild mammal. Although some studies have hypothesized that the fecal microbiome is a nested subset of the intestinal microbiome, this hypothesis has not been formally tested. To address these issues, we examined guano (feces) and distal intestinal mucosa from 19 species of free-ranging bats from Lamanai, Belize, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to compare microbial communities across sample types. We found that the diversity and composition of intestine and guano samples differed substantially. In addition, we conclude that signatures of host evolution are retained by studying gut microbiomes based on mucosal tissue samples, but not fecal samples. Conversely, fecal samples retained more signal of host diet than intestinal samples. These results suggest that fecal and intestinal sampling methods are not interchangeable, and that these two microbiotas record different information about the host from which they are isolated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5938605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59386052018-05-14 Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution Ingala, Melissa R. Simmons, Nancy B. Wultsch, Claudia Krampis, Konstantinos Speer, Kelly A. Perkins, Susan L. Front Microbiol Microbiology The gut microbiome is a community of host-associated symbiotic microbes that fulfills multiple key roles in host metabolism, immune function, and tissue development. Given the ability of the microbiome to impact host fitness, there is increasing interest in studying the microbiome of wild animals to better understand these communities in the context of host ecology and evolution. Human microbiome research protocols are well established, but wildlife microbiome research is still a developing field. Currently, there is no standardized set of best practices guiding the collection of microbiome samples from wildlife. Gut microflora are typically sampled either by fecal collection, rectal swabbing, or by destructively sampling the intestinal contents of the host animal. Studies rarely include more than one sampling technique and no comparison of these methods currently exists for a wild mammal. Although some studies have hypothesized that the fecal microbiome is a nested subset of the intestinal microbiome, this hypothesis has not been formally tested. To address these issues, we examined guano (feces) and distal intestinal mucosa from 19 species of free-ranging bats from Lamanai, Belize, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to compare microbial communities across sample types. We found that the diversity and composition of intestine and guano samples differed substantially. In addition, we conclude that signatures of host evolution are retained by studying gut microbiomes based on mucosal tissue samples, but not fecal samples. Conversely, fecal samples retained more signal of host diet than intestinal samples. These results suggest that fecal and intestinal sampling methods are not interchangeable, and that these two microbiotas record different information about the host from which they are isolated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5938605/ /pubmed/29765359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00803 Text en Copyright © 2018 Ingala, Simmons, Wultsch, Krampis, Speer and Perkins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ingala, Melissa R.
Simmons, Nancy B.
Wultsch, Claudia
Krampis, Konstantinos
Speer, Kelly A.
Perkins, Susan L.
Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title_full Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title_fullStr Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title_short Comparing Microbiome Sampling Methods in a Wild Mammal: Fecal and Intestinal Samples Record Different Signals of Host Ecology, Evolution
title_sort comparing microbiome sampling methods in a wild mammal: fecal and intestinal samples record different signals of host ecology, evolution
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29765359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00803
work_keys_str_mv AT ingalamelissar comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution
AT simmonsnancyb comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution
AT wultschclaudia comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution
AT krampiskonstantinos comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution
AT speerkellya comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution
AT perkinssusanl comparingmicrobiomesamplingmethodsinawildmammalfecalandintestinalsamplesrecorddifferentsignalsofhostecologyevolution