Cargando…

Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing trend in the delivery of mental health treatment via technology (ie, electronic health, eHealth). However, engagement with eHealth interventions is a concern, and theoretically based research in this area is sparse. Factors that influence engagement are poorly un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeager, Carolyn M, Shoji, Kotaro, Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Benight, Charles C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9449
_version_ 1783320828884025344
author Yeager, Carolyn M
Shoji, Kotaro
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Benight, Charles C
author_facet Yeager, Carolyn M
Shoji, Kotaro
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Benight, Charles C
author_sort Yeager, Carolyn M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been a growing trend in the delivery of mental health treatment via technology (ie, electronic health, eHealth). However, engagement with eHealth interventions is a concern, and theoretically based research in this area is sparse. Factors that influence engagement are poorly understood, especially in trauma survivors with symptoms of posttraumatic stress. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine engagement with a trauma recovery eHealth intervention using the Health Action Process Approach theoretical model. Outcome expectancy, perceived need, pretreatment self-efficacy, and trauma symptoms influence the formation of intentions (motivational phase), followed by planning, which mediates the translation of intentions into engagement (volitional phase). We hypothesized the mediational effect of planning would be moderated by level of treatment self-efficacy. METHODS: Trauma survivors from around the United States used the eHealth intervention for 2 weeks. We collected baseline demographic, social cognitive predictors, and distress symptoms and measured engagement subjectively and objectively throughout the intervention. RESULTS: The motivational phase model explained 48% of the variance, and outcome expectations (beta=.36), perceived need (beta=.32), pretreatment self-efficacy (beta=.13), and trauma symptoms (beta=.21) were significant predictors of intention (N=440). In the volitional phase, results of the moderated mediation model indicated for low levels of treatment self-efficacy, planning mediated the effects of intention on levels of engagement (B=0.89, 95% CI 0.143-2.605; N=115). CONCLUSIONS: Though many factors can affect engagement, these results offer a theoretical framework for understanding engagement with an eHealth intervention. This study highlighted the importance of perceived need, outcome expectations, self-efficacy, and baseline distress symptoms in the formation of intentions to use the intervention. For those low in treatment self-efficacy, planning may play an important role in the translation of intentions into engagement. Results of this study may help bring some clarification to the question of what makes eHealth interventions work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5938690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59386902018-05-09 Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study Yeager, Carolyn M Shoji, Kotaro Luszczynska, Aleksandra Benight, Charles C JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: There has been a growing trend in the delivery of mental health treatment via technology (ie, electronic health, eHealth). However, engagement with eHealth interventions is a concern, and theoretically based research in this area is sparse. Factors that influence engagement are poorly understood, especially in trauma survivors with symptoms of posttraumatic stress. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine engagement with a trauma recovery eHealth intervention using the Health Action Process Approach theoretical model. Outcome expectancy, perceived need, pretreatment self-efficacy, and trauma symptoms influence the formation of intentions (motivational phase), followed by planning, which mediates the translation of intentions into engagement (volitional phase). We hypothesized the mediational effect of planning would be moderated by level of treatment self-efficacy. METHODS: Trauma survivors from around the United States used the eHealth intervention for 2 weeks. We collected baseline demographic, social cognitive predictors, and distress symptoms and measured engagement subjectively and objectively throughout the intervention. RESULTS: The motivational phase model explained 48% of the variance, and outcome expectations (beta=.36), perceived need (beta=.32), pretreatment self-efficacy (beta=.13), and trauma symptoms (beta=.21) were significant predictors of intention (N=440). In the volitional phase, results of the moderated mediation model indicated for low levels of treatment self-efficacy, planning mediated the effects of intention on levels of engagement (B=0.89, 95% CI 0.143-2.605; N=115). CONCLUSIONS: Though many factors can affect engagement, these results offer a theoretical framework for understanding engagement with an eHealth intervention. This study highlighted the importance of perceived need, outcome expectations, self-efficacy, and baseline distress symptoms in the formation of intentions to use the intervention. For those low in treatment self-efficacy, planning may play an important role in the translation of intentions into engagement. Results of this study may help bring some clarification to the question of what makes eHealth interventions work. JMIR Publications 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5938690/ /pubmed/29636323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9449 Text en ©Carolyn M Yeager, Kotaro Shoji, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Charles C Benight. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 10.04.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Yeager, Carolyn M
Shoji, Kotaro
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Benight, Charles C
Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title_full Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title_short Engagement With a Trauma Recovery Internet Intervention Explained With the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA): Longitudinal Study
title_sort engagement with a trauma recovery internet intervention explained with the health action process approach (hapa): longitudinal study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5938690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9449
work_keys_str_mv AT yeagercarolynm engagementwithatraumarecoveryinternetinterventionexplainedwiththehealthactionprocessapproachhapalongitudinalstudy
AT shojikotaro engagementwithatraumarecoveryinternetinterventionexplainedwiththehealthactionprocessapproachhapalongitudinalstudy
AT luszczynskaaleksandra engagementwithatraumarecoveryinternetinterventionexplainedwiththehealthactionprocessapproachhapalongitudinalstudy
AT benightcharlesc engagementwithatraumarecoveryinternetinterventionexplainedwiththehealthactionprocessapproachhapalongitudinalstudy