Cargando…

Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery

PURPOSE: Preservation of renal function after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is multifactorial and the impact of individual factors on it is still a debate. This prospective study investigates the impact of factors responsible for quantitative and functional outcome after NSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choudhary, Gautam Ram, Mandal, Arup Kumar, Mete, Uttam, Mavuduru, Ravimohan, Bhatacharia, Anish, Lal, Anupam, Goyal, Suresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_82_17
_version_ 1783320897378058240
author Choudhary, Gautam Ram
Mandal, Arup Kumar
Mete, Uttam
Mavuduru, Ravimohan
Bhatacharia, Anish
Lal, Anupam
Goyal, Suresh
author_facet Choudhary, Gautam Ram
Mandal, Arup Kumar
Mete, Uttam
Mavuduru, Ravimohan
Bhatacharia, Anish
Lal, Anupam
Goyal, Suresh
author_sort Choudhary, Gautam Ram
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Preservation of renal function after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is multifactorial and the impact of individual factors on it is still a debate. This prospective study investigates the impact of factors responsible for quantitative and functional outcome after NSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients of localized renal mass (≤7 cm) were included in the study. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen was performed for characterization of tumor. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using Tc99m-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) scan and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. All relevant intra- and peri-operative events were noted. Follow-up work up performed at 3 months. RESULTS: Overall, the mean ischemia time was 30.6 min, with 7.7% decrease in renal volume in the operated moiety. In follow-up, the total and ipsilateral GFR decreased. Change in renal parenchymal volume, total GFR by CG and DTPA, split GFR of tumor-bearing moiety was significant in follow-up. Size, stage, polar location of tumor, duration of surgery, type of ischemia, preoperative chronic kidney disease, and need of blood transfusion did not affect change in renal volume and function in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Renal parenchymal loss and duration of ischemia have impact on the follow-up renal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5939037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59390372018-05-16 Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery Choudhary, Gautam Ram Mandal, Arup Kumar Mete, Uttam Mavuduru, Ravimohan Bhatacharia, Anish Lal, Anupam Goyal, Suresh J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article PURPOSE: Preservation of renal function after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is multifactorial and the impact of individual factors on it is still a debate. This prospective study investigates the impact of factors responsible for quantitative and functional outcome after NSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients of localized renal mass (≤7 cm) were included in the study. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen was performed for characterization of tumor. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using Tc99m-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) scan and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. All relevant intra- and peri-operative events were noted. Follow-up work up performed at 3 months. RESULTS: Overall, the mean ischemia time was 30.6 min, with 7.7% decrease in renal volume in the operated moiety. In follow-up, the total and ipsilateral GFR decreased. Change in renal parenchymal volume, total GFR by CG and DTPA, split GFR of tumor-bearing moiety was significant in follow-up. Size, stage, polar location of tumor, duration of surgery, type of ischemia, preoperative chronic kidney disease, and need of blood transfusion did not affect change in renal volume and function in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Renal parenchymal loss and duration of ischemia have impact on the follow-up renal function. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5939037/ /pubmed/29770263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_82_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choudhary, Gautam Ram
Mandal, Arup Kumar
Mete, Uttam
Mavuduru, Ravimohan
Bhatacharia, Anish
Lal, Anupam
Goyal, Suresh
Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title_full Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title_fullStr Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title_short Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Renal Outcome Following Nephron Sparing Surgery
title_sort evaluation of quantitative and qualitative renal outcome following nephron sparing surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_82_17
work_keys_str_mv AT choudharygautamram evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT mandalarupkumar evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT meteuttam evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT mavudururavimohan evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT bhatachariaanish evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT lalanupam evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery
AT goyalsuresh evaluationofquantitativeandqualitativerenaloutcomefollowingnephronsparingsurgery