Cargando…
EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033 |
_version_ | 1783320962713780224 |
---|---|
author | Bergin, Peter S. Beghi, Ettore Sadleir, Lynette G. Brockington, Alice Tripathi, Manjari Richardson, Mark P. Bianchi, Elisa Srivastava, Kavita Jayabal, Jayaganth Legros, Benjamin Ossemann, Michel McGrath, Nicole Verrotti, Alberto Tan, Hui Jan Beretta, Simone Frith, Richard Iniesta, Ivan Whitham, Emma Wanigasinghe, Jithangi Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus Striano, Pasquale Rosemergy, Ian Walker, Elizabeth B. Alkhidze, Maia Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo D'Souza, Wendyl J. |
author_facet | Bergin, Peter S. Beghi, Ettore Sadleir, Lynette G. Brockington, Alice Tripathi, Manjari Richardson, Mark P. Bianchi, Elisa Srivastava, Kavita Jayabal, Jayaganth Legros, Benjamin Ossemann, Michel McGrath, Nicole Verrotti, Alberto Tan, Hui Jan Beretta, Simone Frith, Richard Iniesta, Ivan Whitham, Emma Wanigasinghe, Jithangi Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus Striano, Pasquale Rosemergy, Ian Walker, Elizabeth B. Alkhidze, Maia Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo D'Souza, Wendyl J. |
author_sort | Bergin, Peter S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians with an interest in epilepsy were invited to assess 30 case scenarios to determine the following: whether patients have epilepsy; the nature of the seizures (generalized, focal); and the etiology. Information was presented in two steps for 23 cases. The EpiNet steering committee determined that 21 cases had epilepsy. The steering committee determined by consensus which responses were acceptable for each case. We chose a subset of 18 cases to accredit investigators for the EpiNet‐First trials. We initially focused on 12 cases; to be accredited, investigators could not diagnose epilepsy in any case that the steering committee determined did not have epilepsy. If investigators were not accredited after assessing 12 cases, 6 further cases were considered. When assessing the 18 cases, investigators could be accredited if they diagnosed one of six nonepilepsy patients as having possible epilepsy but could make no other false‐positive errors and could make only one error regarding seizure classification. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and December 2014, 189 physicians assessed the 30 cases. Agreement with the steering committee regarding the diagnosis at step 1 ranged from 47% to 100%, and improved when information regarding tests was provided at step 2. One hundred five of the 189 physicians (55%) were accredited for the EpiNet‐First trials. The kappa value for diagnosis of epilepsy across all 30 cases for accredited physicians was 0.70. SIGNIFICANCE: We have established criteria for accrediting physicians using EpiNet. New investigators can be accredited by assessing 18 case scenarios. We encourage physicians with an interest in epilepsy to become EpiNet‐accredited and to participate in these investigator‐led clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5939455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59394552018-05-10 EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process Bergin, Peter S. Beghi, Ettore Sadleir, Lynette G. Brockington, Alice Tripathi, Manjari Richardson, Mark P. Bianchi, Elisa Srivastava, Kavita Jayabal, Jayaganth Legros, Benjamin Ossemann, Michel McGrath, Nicole Verrotti, Alberto Tan, Hui Jan Beretta, Simone Frith, Richard Iniesta, Ivan Whitham, Emma Wanigasinghe, Jithangi Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus Striano, Pasquale Rosemergy, Ian Walker, Elizabeth B. Alkhidze, Maia Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo D'Souza, Wendyl J. Epilepsia Open Invited Original Research OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians with an interest in epilepsy were invited to assess 30 case scenarios to determine the following: whether patients have epilepsy; the nature of the seizures (generalized, focal); and the etiology. Information was presented in two steps for 23 cases. The EpiNet steering committee determined that 21 cases had epilepsy. The steering committee determined by consensus which responses were acceptable for each case. We chose a subset of 18 cases to accredit investigators for the EpiNet‐First trials. We initially focused on 12 cases; to be accredited, investigators could not diagnose epilepsy in any case that the steering committee determined did not have epilepsy. If investigators were not accredited after assessing 12 cases, 6 further cases were considered. When assessing the 18 cases, investigators could be accredited if they diagnosed one of six nonepilepsy patients as having possible epilepsy but could make no other false‐positive errors and could make only one error regarding seizure classification. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and December 2014, 189 physicians assessed the 30 cases. Agreement with the steering committee regarding the diagnosis at step 1 ranged from 47% to 100%, and improved when information regarding tests was provided at step 2. One hundred five of the 189 physicians (55%) were accredited for the EpiNet‐First trials. The kappa value for diagnosis of epilepsy across all 30 cases for accredited physicians was 0.70. SIGNIFICANCE: We have established criteria for accrediting physicians using EpiNet. New investigators can be accredited by assessing 18 case scenarios. We encourage physicians with an interest in epilepsy to become EpiNet‐accredited and to participate in these investigator‐led clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5939455/ /pubmed/29750210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Invited Original Research Bergin, Peter S. Beghi, Ettore Sadleir, Lynette G. Brockington, Alice Tripathi, Manjari Richardson, Mark P. Bianchi, Elisa Srivastava, Kavita Jayabal, Jayaganth Legros, Benjamin Ossemann, Michel McGrath, Nicole Verrotti, Alberto Tan, Hui Jan Beretta, Simone Frith, Richard Iniesta, Ivan Whitham, Emma Wanigasinghe, Jithangi Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus Striano, Pasquale Rosemergy, Ian Walker, Elizabeth B. Alkhidze, Maia Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo D'Souza, Wendyl J. EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title | EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title_full | EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title_fullStr | EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title_full_unstemmed | EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title_short | EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process |
title_sort | epinet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: validation study and accreditation process |
topic | Invited Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berginpeters epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT beghiettore epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT sadleirlynetteg epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT brockingtonalice epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT tripathimanjari epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT richardsonmarkp epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT bianchielisa epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT srivastavakavita epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT jayabaljayaganth epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT legrosbenjamin epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT ossemannmichel epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT mcgrathnicole epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT verrottialberto epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT tanhuijan epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT berettasimone epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT frithrichard epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT iniestaivan epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT whithamemma epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT wanigasinghejithangi epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT ezealaadikaibebirinus epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT strianopasquale epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT rosemergyian epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT walkerelizabethb epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT alkhidzemaia epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT rodriguezleyvaildefonso epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT ramirezgonzalezjosealfredo epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT dsouzawendylj epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess AT epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess |