Cargando…

EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process

OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergin, Peter S., Beghi, Ettore, Sadleir, Lynette G., Brockington, Alice, Tripathi, Manjari, Richardson, Mark P., Bianchi, Elisa, Srivastava, Kavita, Jayabal, Jayaganth, Legros, Benjamin, Ossemann, Michel, McGrath, Nicole, Verrotti, Alberto, Tan, Hui Jan, Beretta, Simone, Frith, Richard, Iniesta, Ivan, Whitham, Emma, Wanigasinghe, Jithangi, Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus, Striano, Pasquale, Rosemergy, Ian, Walker, Elizabeth B., Alkhidze, Maia, Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso, Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo, D'Souza, Wendyl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033
_version_ 1783320962713780224
author Bergin, Peter S.
Beghi, Ettore
Sadleir, Lynette G.
Brockington, Alice
Tripathi, Manjari
Richardson, Mark P.
Bianchi, Elisa
Srivastava, Kavita
Jayabal, Jayaganth
Legros, Benjamin
Ossemann, Michel
McGrath, Nicole
Verrotti, Alberto
Tan, Hui Jan
Beretta, Simone
Frith, Richard
Iniesta, Ivan
Whitham, Emma
Wanigasinghe, Jithangi
Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus
Striano, Pasquale
Rosemergy, Ian
Walker, Elizabeth B.
Alkhidze, Maia
Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso
Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo
D'Souza, Wendyl J.
author_facet Bergin, Peter S.
Beghi, Ettore
Sadleir, Lynette G.
Brockington, Alice
Tripathi, Manjari
Richardson, Mark P.
Bianchi, Elisa
Srivastava, Kavita
Jayabal, Jayaganth
Legros, Benjamin
Ossemann, Michel
McGrath, Nicole
Verrotti, Alberto
Tan, Hui Jan
Beretta, Simone
Frith, Richard
Iniesta, Ivan
Whitham, Emma
Wanigasinghe, Jithangi
Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus
Striano, Pasquale
Rosemergy, Ian
Walker, Elizabeth B.
Alkhidze, Maia
Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso
Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo
D'Souza, Wendyl J.
author_sort Bergin, Peter S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians with an interest in epilepsy were invited to assess 30 case scenarios to determine the following: whether patients have epilepsy; the nature of the seizures (generalized, focal); and the etiology. Information was presented in two steps for 23 cases. The EpiNet steering committee determined that 21 cases had epilepsy. The steering committee determined by consensus which responses were acceptable for each case. We chose a subset of 18 cases to accredit investigators for the EpiNet‐First trials. We initially focused on 12 cases; to be accredited, investigators could not diagnose epilepsy in any case that the steering committee determined did not have epilepsy. If investigators were not accredited after assessing 12 cases, 6 further cases were considered. When assessing the 18 cases, investigators could be accredited if they diagnosed one of six nonepilepsy patients as having possible epilepsy but could make no other false‐positive errors and could make only one error regarding seizure classification. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and December 2014, 189 physicians assessed the 30 cases. Agreement with the steering committee regarding the diagnosis at step 1 ranged from 47% to 100%, and improved when information regarding tests was provided at step 2. One hundred five of the 189 physicians (55%) were accredited for the EpiNet‐First trials. The kappa value for diagnosis of epilepsy across all 30 cases for accredited physicians was 0.70. SIGNIFICANCE: We have established criteria for accrediting physicians using EpiNet. New investigators can be accredited by assessing 18 case scenarios. We encourage physicians with an interest in epilepsy to become EpiNet‐accredited and to participate in these investigator‐led clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5939455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59394552018-05-10 EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process Bergin, Peter S. Beghi, Ettore Sadleir, Lynette G. Brockington, Alice Tripathi, Manjari Richardson, Mark P. Bianchi, Elisa Srivastava, Kavita Jayabal, Jayaganth Legros, Benjamin Ossemann, Michel McGrath, Nicole Verrotti, Alberto Tan, Hui Jan Beretta, Simone Frith, Richard Iniesta, Ivan Whitham, Emma Wanigasinghe, Jithangi Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus Striano, Pasquale Rosemergy, Ian Walker, Elizabeth B. Alkhidze, Maia Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo D'Souza, Wendyl J. Epilepsia Open Invited Original Research OBJECTIVE: EpiNet was established to encourage epilepsy research. EpiNet is used for multicenter cohort studies and investigator‐led trials. Physicians must be accredited to recruit patients into trials. Here, we describe the accreditation process for the EpiNet‐First trials. METHODS: Physicians with an interest in epilepsy were invited to assess 30 case scenarios to determine the following: whether patients have epilepsy; the nature of the seizures (generalized, focal); and the etiology. Information was presented in two steps for 23 cases. The EpiNet steering committee determined that 21 cases had epilepsy. The steering committee determined by consensus which responses were acceptable for each case. We chose a subset of 18 cases to accredit investigators for the EpiNet‐First trials. We initially focused on 12 cases; to be accredited, investigators could not diagnose epilepsy in any case that the steering committee determined did not have epilepsy. If investigators were not accredited after assessing 12 cases, 6 further cases were considered. When assessing the 18 cases, investigators could be accredited if they diagnosed one of six nonepilepsy patients as having possible epilepsy but could make no other false‐positive errors and could make only one error regarding seizure classification. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and December 2014, 189 physicians assessed the 30 cases. Agreement with the steering committee regarding the diagnosis at step 1 ranged from 47% to 100%, and improved when information regarding tests was provided at step 2. One hundred five of the 189 physicians (55%) were accredited for the EpiNet‐First trials. The kappa value for diagnosis of epilepsy across all 30 cases for accredited physicians was 0.70. SIGNIFICANCE: We have established criteria for accrediting physicians using EpiNet. New investigators can be accredited by assessing 18 case scenarios. We encourage physicians with an interest in epilepsy to become EpiNet‐accredited and to participate in these investigator‐led clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5939455/ /pubmed/29750210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Invited Original Research
Bergin, Peter S.
Beghi, Ettore
Sadleir, Lynette G.
Brockington, Alice
Tripathi, Manjari
Richardson, Mark P.
Bianchi, Elisa
Srivastava, Kavita
Jayabal, Jayaganth
Legros, Benjamin
Ossemann, Michel
McGrath, Nicole
Verrotti, Alberto
Tan, Hui Jan
Beretta, Simone
Frith, Richard
Iniesta, Ivan
Whitham, Emma
Wanigasinghe, Jithangi
Ezeala‐Adikaibe, Birinus
Striano, Pasquale
Rosemergy, Ian
Walker, Elizabeth B.
Alkhidze, Maia
Rodriguez‐Leyva, Ildefonso
Ramírez González, Jose Alfredo
D'Souza, Wendyl J.
EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title_full EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title_fullStr EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title_full_unstemmed EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title_short EpiNet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: Validation study and accreditation process
title_sort epinet as a way of involving more physicians and patients in epilepsy research: validation study and accreditation process
topic Invited Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12033
work_keys_str_mv AT berginpeters epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT beghiettore epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT sadleirlynetteg epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT brockingtonalice epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT tripathimanjari epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT richardsonmarkp epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT bianchielisa epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT srivastavakavita epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT jayabaljayaganth epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT legrosbenjamin epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT ossemannmichel epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT mcgrathnicole epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT verrottialberto epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT tanhuijan epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT berettasimone epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT frithrichard epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT iniestaivan epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT whithamemma epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT wanigasinghejithangi epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT ezealaadikaibebirinus epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT strianopasquale epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT rosemergyian epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT walkerelizabethb epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT alkhidzemaia epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT rodriguezleyvaildefonso epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT ramirezgonzalezjosealfredo epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT dsouzawendylj epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess
AT epinetasawayofinvolvingmorephysiciansandpatientsinepilepsyresearchvalidationstudyandaccreditationprocess