Cargando…

Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is reportedly useful in patients who have acute cholecystitis, its efficacy has not been compared to that of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). We retrospectively compared the efficacy an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iino, Chikara, Shimoyama, Tadashi, Igarashi, Takasato, Aihara, Tomoyuki, Ishii, Kentaro, Sakamoto, Juichi, Tono, Hiroshi, Fukuda, Shinsaku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-102091
_version_ 1783321109201944576
author Iino, Chikara
Shimoyama, Tadashi
Igarashi, Takasato
Aihara, Tomoyuki
Ishii, Kentaro
Sakamoto, Juichi
Tono, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Shinsaku
author_facet Iino, Chikara
Shimoyama, Tadashi
Igarashi, Takasato
Aihara, Tomoyuki
Ishii, Kentaro
Sakamoto, Juichi
Tono, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Shinsaku
author_sort Iino, Chikara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is reportedly useful in patients who have acute cholecystitis, its efficacy has not been compared to that of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ETGBD and PTGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We studied 75 patients who required gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis between January 2014 and December 2016. Using propensity score matching analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy and length of hospitalization in patients successfully treated with ETGBD and PTGBD. Moreover, we assessed the predictive factors for hospitalization period < 30 days using multivariate analysis. RESULTS : ETGBD and PTGBD were successfully performed in 33 patients (77 %) and 42 patients (100 %) ( P  < 0.001). Twenty-seven matched pairs were obtained after propensity score matching analysis. No significant differences were observed between patients treated with ETGBD and those treated with PTGBD with respect to improvement in white blood cell count and serum C-reactive protein level. The length of hospitalization in patients treated with ETGBD was significantly shorter than in those treated with PTGBD regardless of the need for surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed ETGBD (odds ratio, 7.07; 95 % confidence interval 2.22 – 22.46) and surgery (odds ratio 0.26; 95 % confidence interval 0.09 – 0.79) as independent factors associated with hospitalization period. There were no significant differences in occurrence of complications in ETGBD and PTGBD procedure. CONCLUSIONS : ETGBD was shown to be as useful as PTGBD for treatment of acute cholecystitis and was associated with shorter hospitalization period. ETGBD can be an alternative treatment option for acute cholecystitis at times when PTGBD is not possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5940465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59404652018-05-09 Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis Iino, Chikara Shimoyama, Tadashi Igarashi, Takasato Aihara, Tomoyuki Ishii, Kentaro Sakamoto, Juichi Tono, Hiroshi Fukuda, Shinsaku Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is reportedly useful in patients who have acute cholecystitis, its efficacy has not been compared to that of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ETGBD and PTGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We studied 75 patients who required gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis between January 2014 and December 2016. Using propensity score matching analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy and length of hospitalization in patients successfully treated with ETGBD and PTGBD. Moreover, we assessed the predictive factors for hospitalization period < 30 days using multivariate analysis. RESULTS : ETGBD and PTGBD were successfully performed in 33 patients (77 %) and 42 patients (100 %) ( P  < 0.001). Twenty-seven matched pairs were obtained after propensity score matching analysis. No significant differences were observed between patients treated with ETGBD and those treated with PTGBD with respect to improvement in white blood cell count and serum C-reactive protein level. The length of hospitalization in patients treated with ETGBD was significantly shorter than in those treated with PTGBD regardless of the need for surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed ETGBD (odds ratio, 7.07; 95 % confidence interval 2.22 – 22.46) and surgery (odds ratio 0.26; 95 % confidence interval 0.09 – 0.79) as independent factors associated with hospitalization period. There were no significant differences in occurrence of complications in ETGBD and PTGBD procedure. CONCLUSIONS : ETGBD was shown to be as useful as PTGBD for treatment of acute cholecystitis and was associated with shorter hospitalization period. ETGBD can be an alternative treatment option for acute cholecystitis at times when PTGBD is not possible. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-05 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5940465/ /pubmed/29744378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-102091 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Iino, Chikara
Shimoyama, Tadashi
Igarashi, Takasato
Aihara, Tomoyuki
Ishii, Kentaro
Sakamoto, Juichi
Tono, Hiroshi
Fukuda, Shinsaku
Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title_full Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title_fullStr Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title_short Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
title_sort comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-102091
work_keys_str_mv AT iinochikara comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT shimoyamatadashi comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT igarashitakasato comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT aiharatomoyuki comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT ishiikentaro comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT sakamotojuichi comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT tonohiroshi comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis
AT fukudashinsaku comparableefficacyofendoscopictranspapillarygallbladderdrainageandpercutaneoustranshepaticgallbladderdrainageinacutecholecystitis