Cargando…

Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease

In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Chao, Sun, Hanbo, Wang, Tuo, Tang, Ming, Bohnen, Nicolaas I., Müller, Martijn L. T. M., Herman, Talia, Giladi, Nir, Kalinin, Alexandr, Spino, Cathie, Dauer, William, Hausdorff, Jeffrey M., Dinov, Ivo D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4
_version_ 1783321128612134912
author Gao, Chao
Sun, Hanbo
Wang, Tuo
Tang, Ming
Bohnen, Nicolaas I.
Müller, Martijn L. T. M.
Herman, Talia
Giladi, Nir
Kalinin, Alexandr
Spino, Cathie
Dauer, William
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
Dinov, Ivo D.
author_facet Gao, Chao
Sun, Hanbo
Wang, Tuo
Tang, Ming
Bohnen, Nicolaas I.
Müller, Martijn L. T. M.
Herman, Talia
Giladi, Nir
Kalinin, Alexandr
Spino, Cathie
Dauer, William
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
Dinov, Ivo D.
author_sort Gao, Chao
collection PubMed
description In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models to discriminate fallers and non-fallers. Through controlled feature selection, we identified the most salient predictors of patient falls including gait speed, Hoehn and Yahr stage, postural instability and gait difficulty-related measurements. The model-based and model-free analytical methods we employed included logistic regression, random forests, support vector machines, and XGboost. The reliability of the forecasts was assessed by internal statistical (5-fold) cross validation as well as by external out-of-bag validation. Four specific challenges were addressed in the study: Challenge 1, develop a protocol for harmonizing and aggregating complex, multisource, and multi-site Parkinson’s disease data; Challenge 2, identify salient predictive features associated with specific clinical traits, e.g., patient falls; Challenge 3, forecast patient falls and evaluate the classification performance; and Challenge 4, predict tremor dominance (TD) vs. posture instability and gait difficulty (PIGD). Our findings suggest that, compared to other approaches, model-free machine learning based techniques provide a more reliable clinical outcome forecasting of falls in Parkinson’s patients, for example, with a classification accuracy of about 70–80%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5940671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59406712018-05-11 Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease Gao, Chao Sun, Hanbo Wang, Tuo Tang, Ming Bohnen, Nicolaas I. Müller, Martijn L. T. M. Herman, Talia Giladi, Nir Kalinin, Alexandr Spino, Cathie Dauer, William Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. Dinov, Ivo D. Sci Rep Article In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models to discriminate fallers and non-fallers. Through controlled feature selection, we identified the most salient predictors of patient falls including gait speed, Hoehn and Yahr stage, postural instability and gait difficulty-related measurements. The model-based and model-free analytical methods we employed included logistic regression, random forests, support vector machines, and XGboost. The reliability of the forecasts was assessed by internal statistical (5-fold) cross validation as well as by external out-of-bag validation. Four specific challenges were addressed in the study: Challenge 1, develop a protocol for harmonizing and aggregating complex, multisource, and multi-site Parkinson’s disease data; Challenge 2, identify salient predictive features associated with specific clinical traits, e.g., patient falls; Challenge 3, forecast patient falls and evaluate the classification performance; and Challenge 4, predict tremor dominance (TD) vs. posture instability and gait difficulty (PIGD). Our findings suggest that, compared to other approaches, model-free machine learning based techniques provide a more reliable clinical outcome forecasting of falls in Parkinson’s patients, for example, with a classification accuracy of about 70–80%. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5940671/ /pubmed/29740058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gao, Chao
Sun, Hanbo
Wang, Tuo
Tang, Ming
Bohnen, Nicolaas I.
Müller, Martijn L. T. M.
Herman, Talia
Giladi, Nir
Kalinin, Alexandr
Spino, Cathie
Dauer, William
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
Dinov, Ivo D.
Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_fullStr Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_short Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_sort model-based and model-free machine learning techniques for diagnostic prediction and classification of clinical outcomes in parkinson’s disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gaochao modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT sunhanbo modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT wangtuo modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT tangming modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT bohnennicolaasi modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT mullermartijnltm modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT hermantalia modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT giladinir modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT kalininalexandr modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT spinocathie modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT dauerwilliam modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT hausdorffjeffreym modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease
AT dinovivod modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease