Cargando…
Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease
In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4 |
_version_ | 1783321128612134912 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Chao Sun, Hanbo Wang, Tuo Tang, Ming Bohnen, Nicolaas I. Müller, Martijn L. T. M. Herman, Talia Giladi, Nir Kalinin, Alexandr Spino, Cathie Dauer, William Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. Dinov, Ivo D. |
author_facet | Gao, Chao Sun, Hanbo Wang, Tuo Tang, Ming Bohnen, Nicolaas I. Müller, Martijn L. T. M. Herman, Talia Giladi, Nir Kalinin, Alexandr Spino, Cathie Dauer, William Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. Dinov, Ivo D. |
author_sort | Gao, Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models to discriminate fallers and non-fallers. Through controlled feature selection, we identified the most salient predictors of patient falls including gait speed, Hoehn and Yahr stage, postural instability and gait difficulty-related measurements. The model-based and model-free analytical methods we employed included logistic regression, random forests, support vector machines, and XGboost. The reliability of the forecasts was assessed by internal statistical (5-fold) cross validation as well as by external out-of-bag validation. Four specific challenges were addressed in the study: Challenge 1, develop a protocol for harmonizing and aggregating complex, multisource, and multi-site Parkinson’s disease data; Challenge 2, identify salient predictive features associated with specific clinical traits, e.g., patient falls; Challenge 3, forecast patient falls and evaluate the classification performance; and Challenge 4, predict tremor dominance (TD) vs. posture instability and gait difficulty (PIGD). Our findings suggest that, compared to other approaches, model-free machine learning based techniques provide a more reliable clinical outcome forecasting of falls in Parkinson’s patients, for example, with a classification accuracy of about 70–80%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5940671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59406712018-05-11 Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease Gao, Chao Sun, Hanbo Wang, Tuo Tang, Ming Bohnen, Nicolaas I. Müller, Martijn L. T. M. Herman, Talia Giladi, Nir Kalinin, Alexandr Spino, Cathie Dauer, William Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. Dinov, Ivo D. Sci Rep Article In this study, we apply a multidisciplinary approach to investigate falls in PD patients using clinical, demographic and neuroimaging data from two independent initiatives (University of Michigan and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center). Using machine learning techniques, we construct predictive models to discriminate fallers and non-fallers. Through controlled feature selection, we identified the most salient predictors of patient falls including gait speed, Hoehn and Yahr stage, postural instability and gait difficulty-related measurements. The model-based and model-free analytical methods we employed included logistic regression, random forests, support vector machines, and XGboost. The reliability of the forecasts was assessed by internal statistical (5-fold) cross validation as well as by external out-of-bag validation. Four specific challenges were addressed in the study: Challenge 1, develop a protocol for harmonizing and aggregating complex, multisource, and multi-site Parkinson’s disease data; Challenge 2, identify salient predictive features associated with specific clinical traits, e.g., patient falls; Challenge 3, forecast patient falls and evaluate the classification performance; and Challenge 4, predict tremor dominance (TD) vs. posture instability and gait difficulty (PIGD). Our findings suggest that, compared to other approaches, model-free machine learning based techniques provide a more reliable clinical outcome forecasting of falls in Parkinson’s patients, for example, with a classification accuracy of about 70–80%. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5940671/ /pubmed/29740058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Gao, Chao Sun, Hanbo Wang, Tuo Tang, Ming Bohnen, Nicolaas I. Müller, Martijn L. T. M. Herman, Talia Giladi, Nir Kalinin, Alexandr Spino, Cathie Dauer, William Hausdorff, Jeffrey M. Dinov, Ivo D. Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title | Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full | Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_fullStr | Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_short | Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_sort | model-based and model-free machine learning techniques for diagnostic prediction and classification of clinical outcomes in parkinson’s disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaochao modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT sunhanbo modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT wangtuo modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT tangming modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT bohnennicolaasi modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT mullermartijnltm modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT hermantalia modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT giladinir modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT kalininalexandr modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT spinocathie modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT dauerwilliam modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT hausdorffjeffreym modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease AT dinovivod modelbasedandmodelfreemachinelearningtechniquesfordiagnosticpredictionandclassificationofclinicaloutcomesinparkinsonsdisease |