Cargando…
Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5 |
_version_ | 1783321137120280576 |
---|---|
author | Otgaar, Henry Romeo, Tameka Ramakers, Niki Howe, Mark L. |
author_facet | Otgaar, Henry Romeo, Tameka Ramakers, Niki Howe, Mark L. |
author_sort | Otgaar, Henry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participants had to deny seeing certain details in the video, whereas the other half had to tell the truth. One day later, all participants were given either a source-monitoring recognition or a recall task. In these tasks, they were instructed to indicate (1) whether they could remember talking about certain details and (2) whether they could recollect seeing those details in the video. In both experiments, we found that denial made participants forget that they had talked about these details, while leaving memory for the video itself unaffected. This denial-induced forgetting was evident for both the source-monitoring recognition and recall tests. Furthermore, when we asked participants after the experiment whether they could still not remember talking about these details, those who had to deny were most likely to report that they had forgotten talking about the details. In contrast to a widely held belief, we show that denial does not impair memory for the experienced stimuli, but that it has a unique ability to undermine memory for what has been talked about. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5940707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59407072018-05-14 Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial Otgaar, Henry Romeo, Tameka Ramakers, Niki Howe, Mark L. Mem Cognit Article The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participants had to deny seeing certain details in the video, whereas the other half had to tell the truth. One day later, all participants were given either a source-monitoring recognition or a recall task. In these tasks, they were instructed to indicate (1) whether they could remember talking about certain details and (2) whether they could recollect seeing those details in the video. In both experiments, we found that denial made participants forget that they had talked about these details, while leaving memory for the video itself unaffected. This denial-induced forgetting was evident for both the source-monitoring recognition and recall tests. Furthermore, when we asked participants after the experiment whether they could still not remember talking about these details, those who had to deny were most likely to report that they had forgotten talking about the details. In contrast to a widely held belief, we show that denial does not impair memory for the experienced stimuli, but that it has a unique ability to undermine memory for what has been talked about. Springer US 2017-12-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5940707/ /pubmed/29264864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Otgaar, Henry Romeo, Tameka Ramakers, Niki Howe, Mark L. Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title | Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title_full | Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title_fullStr | Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title_full_unstemmed | Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title_short | Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial |
title_sort | forgetting having denied: the “amnesic” consequences of denial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT otgaarhenry forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial AT romeotameka forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial AT ramakersniki forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial AT howemarkl forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial |