Cargando…

Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial

The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otgaar, Henry, Romeo, Tameka, Ramakers, Niki, Howe, Mark L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5
_version_ 1783321137120280576
author Otgaar, Henry
Romeo, Tameka
Ramakers, Niki
Howe, Mark L.
author_facet Otgaar, Henry
Romeo, Tameka
Ramakers, Niki
Howe, Mark L.
author_sort Otgaar, Henry
collection PubMed
description The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participants had to deny seeing certain details in the video, whereas the other half had to tell the truth. One day later, all participants were given either a source-monitoring recognition or a recall task. In these tasks, they were instructed to indicate (1) whether they could remember talking about certain details and (2) whether they could recollect seeing those details in the video. In both experiments, we found that denial made participants forget that they had talked about these details, while leaving memory for the video itself unaffected. This denial-induced forgetting was evident for both the source-monitoring recognition and recall tests. Furthermore, when we asked participants after the experiment whether they could still not remember talking about these details, those who had to deny were most likely to report that they had forgotten talking about the details. In contrast to a widely held belief, we show that denial does not impair memory for the experienced stimuli, but that it has a unique ability to undermine memory for what has been talked about.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5940707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59407072018-05-14 Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial Otgaar, Henry Romeo, Tameka Ramakers, Niki Howe, Mark L. Mem Cognit Article The concept of denial has its roots in psychoanalysis. Denial has been assumed to be effective in blocking unwanted memories. In two experiments, we report that denial has unique consequences for remembering. In our two experiments, participants viewed a video of a theft, and half of the participants had to deny seeing certain details in the video, whereas the other half had to tell the truth. One day later, all participants were given either a source-monitoring recognition or a recall task. In these tasks, they were instructed to indicate (1) whether they could remember talking about certain details and (2) whether they could recollect seeing those details in the video. In both experiments, we found that denial made participants forget that they had talked about these details, while leaving memory for the video itself unaffected. This denial-induced forgetting was evident for both the source-monitoring recognition and recall tests. Furthermore, when we asked participants after the experiment whether they could still not remember talking about these details, those who had to deny were most likely to report that they had forgotten talking about the details. In contrast to a widely held belief, we show that denial does not impair memory for the experienced stimuli, but that it has a unique ability to undermine memory for what has been talked about. Springer US 2017-12-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5940707/ /pubmed/29264864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Otgaar, Henry
Romeo, Tameka
Ramakers, Niki
Howe, Mark L.
Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title_full Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title_fullStr Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title_full_unstemmed Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title_short Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial
title_sort forgetting having denied: the “amnesic” consequences of denial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29264864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5
work_keys_str_mv AT otgaarhenry forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial
AT romeotameka forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial
AT ramakersniki forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial
AT howemarkl forgettinghavingdeniedtheamnesicconsequencesofdenial