Cargando…

Covalent triazine framework modified with coordinatively-unsaturated Co or Ni atoms for CO(2) electrochemical reduction

The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has attracted considerable attention as a means of maintaining the carbon cycle. This process still suffers from poor performance, including low faradaic efficiencies and high overpotential. Herein, we attempted to use coordination number as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Panpan, Iwase, Kazuyuki, Harada, Takashi, Kamiya, Kazuhide, Nakanishi, Shuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8sc00604k
Descripción
Sumario:The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has attracted considerable attention as a means of maintaining the carbon cycle. This process still suffers from poor performance, including low faradaic efficiencies and high overpotential. Herein, we attempted to use coordination number as a control parameter to improve the electrocatalytic performance of metal species that have previously been thought to have no CO(2) reduction activity. Covalent triazine frameworks (CTF) modified with coordinatively-unsaturated 3d metal atoms (Co, Ni or Cu) were developed for efficient electroreduction of CO(2). Co-CTF and Ni-CTF materials effectively reduced CO(2) to CO from –0.5 V versus RHE. The faradaic efficiency of the Ni-CTF during CO formation reached 90% at –0.8 V versus RHE. The performance of Ni-CTF is much higher than that of the corresponding metal-porphyrin (using tetraphenylporphyrin; TPP). First principles calculations demonstrated that the intermediate species (adsorbed COOH) was stabilized on the metal atoms in the CTF due to the low-coordination structure of this support. Thus, the free energy barriers for the formation of adsorbed COOH on the metal atoms in the CTF supports were lower than those on the TPP supports.