Cargando…

Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data

BACKGROUND: Certain cancer case ascertainment methods used in Quebec and elsewhere are known to underestimate the burden of cancer, particularly for some subgroups. Algorithms using claims data are a low-cost option to improve the quality of cancer surveillance, but have not frequently been implemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diop, Mamadou, Strumpf, Erin C., Datta, Geetanjali D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x
_version_ 1783321267366002688
author Diop, Mamadou
Strumpf, Erin C.
Datta, Geetanjali D.
author_facet Diop, Mamadou
Strumpf, Erin C.
Datta, Geetanjali D.
author_sort Diop, Mamadou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Certain cancer case ascertainment methods used in Quebec and elsewhere are known to underestimate the burden of cancer, particularly for some subgroups. Algorithms using claims data are a low-cost option to improve the quality of cancer surveillance, but have not frequently been implemented at the population-level. Our objectives were to 1) develop a colorectal cancer (CRC) case ascertainment algorithm using population-level hospitalization and physician billing data, 2) validate the algorithm, and 3) describe the characteristics of cases. METHODS: We linked physician billing, hospitalization, and tumor registry data for 2,013,430 Montreal residents age 20+ (2000–2010). We compared the performance of three algorithms based on diagnosis and treatment codes from different data sources. We described identified cases according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, treatment patterns, site distribution, and time trends. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Our algorithm based on diagnosis and treatment codes identified 11,476 of the 12,933 incident CRC cases contained in the tumor registry as well as 2317 newly-captured cases. Our cases share similar overall time trends and site distributions to existing data, which increases our confidence in the algorithm. Our algorithm captured proportionally 35% more individuals age 50 and younger among CRC cases: 8.2% vs. 5.3%. The newly captured cases were also more likely to be living in socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm provides a more complete picture of population-wide CRC incidence than existing case ascertainment methods. It could be used to estimate long-term incidence trends, aid in timely surveillance, and to inform interventions, in both Quebec and other jurisdictions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59413402018-05-14 Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data Diop, Mamadou Strumpf, Erin C. Datta, Geetanjali D. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Certain cancer case ascertainment methods used in Quebec and elsewhere are known to underestimate the burden of cancer, particularly for some subgroups. Algorithms using claims data are a low-cost option to improve the quality of cancer surveillance, but have not frequently been implemented at the population-level. Our objectives were to 1) develop a colorectal cancer (CRC) case ascertainment algorithm using population-level hospitalization and physician billing data, 2) validate the algorithm, and 3) describe the characteristics of cases. METHODS: We linked physician billing, hospitalization, and tumor registry data for 2,013,430 Montreal residents age 20+ (2000–2010). We compared the performance of three algorithms based on diagnosis and treatment codes from different data sources. We described identified cases according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, treatment patterns, site distribution, and time trends. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Our algorithm based on diagnosis and treatment codes identified 11,476 of the 12,933 incident CRC cases contained in the tumor registry as well as 2317 newly-captured cases. Our cases share similar overall time trends and site distributions to existing data, which increases our confidence in the algorithm. Our algorithm captured proportionally 35% more individuals age 50 and younger among CRC cases: 8.2% vs. 5.3%. The newly captured cases were also more likely to be living in socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm provides a more complete picture of population-wide CRC incidence than existing case ascertainment methods. It could be used to estimate long-term incidence trends, aid in timely surveillance, and to inform interventions, in both Quebec and other jurisdictions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5941340/ /pubmed/29739338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Diop, Mamadou
Strumpf, Erin C.
Datta, Geetanjali D.
Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title_full Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title_fullStr Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title_full_unstemmed Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title_short Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
title_sort measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0494-x
work_keys_str_mv AT diopmamadou measuringcolorectalcancerincidencetheperformanceofanalgorithmusingadministrativehealthdata
AT strumpferinc measuringcolorectalcancerincidencetheperformanceofanalgorithmusingadministrativehealthdata
AT dattageetanjalid measuringcolorectalcancerincidencetheperformanceofanalgorithmusingadministrativehealthdata