Cargando…

In vivo cartilage tissue engineering

BACKGROUND: Biologic treatment options for cartilage injuries require chondrocyte expansion using cell culture. Clinical application is accomplished in two surgical sessions and is expensive. If isolation of chondrocytes and stimulus for proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis can be achiev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurer, B., Cabuk, S., Karakus, O., Yilmaz, N., Yilmaz, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0823-0
_version_ 1783321295631417344
author Gurer, B.
Cabuk, S.
Karakus, O.
Yilmaz, N.
Yilmaz, C.
author_facet Gurer, B.
Cabuk, S.
Karakus, O.
Yilmaz, N.
Yilmaz, C.
author_sort Gurer, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic treatment options for cartilage injuries require chondrocyte expansion using cell culture. Clinical application is accomplished in two surgical sessions and is expensive. If isolation of chondrocytes and stimulus for proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis can be achieved in vivo, the treatment can be performed in one session and the cost can be reduced. METHODS: A 2.5-cm diameter full-thickness chondral defect was created in the knees of five groups of sheep. In one group, some of the chondral tissues obtained from the creation of the defect were diced into small pieces and were placed into the defect and were covered with a collagen membrane (MIV group). In the other group, the collagen membrane was soaked in collagenase prior to usage. In the next group, the collagen membrane was soaked in both collagenase and growth factors. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) was applied to another group in two sessions, and the last group was left untreated. After 15 weeks of follow-up, repair tissues were compared macroscopically, histomorphometrically, and biochemically for tissue concentrations of glycosaminoglycan and type II collagen. RESULTS: MACI and MIV groups demonstrated better healing than others and were similar. Addition of collagenase or growth factors did not improve the results. Addition of collagenase did not have detrimental effect on the surrounding cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: With the described method, it is possible to obtain comparable results with MACI. Further studies are also needed to see if it works similarly in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59414862018-05-14 In vivo cartilage tissue engineering Gurer, B. Cabuk, S. Karakus, O. Yilmaz, N. Yilmaz, C. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Biologic treatment options for cartilage injuries require chondrocyte expansion using cell culture. Clinical application is accomplished in two surgical sessions and is expensive. If isolation of chondrocytes and stimulus for proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis can be achieved in vivo, the treatment can be performed in one session and the cost can be reduced. METHODS: A 2.5-cm diameter full-thickness chondral defect was created in the knees of five groups of sheep. In one group, some of the chondral tissues obtained from the creation of the defect were diced into small pieces and were placed into the defect and were covered with a collagen membrane (MIV group). In the other group, the collagen membrane was soaked in collagenase prior to usage. In the next group, the collagen membrane was soaked in both collagenase and growth factors. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) was applied to another group in two sessions, and the last group was left untreated. After 15 weeks of follow-up, repair tissues were compared macroscopically, histomorphometrically, and biochemically for tissue concentrations of glycosaminoglycan and type II collagen. RESULTS: MACI and MIV groups demonstrated better healing than others and were similar. Addition of collagenase or growth factors did not improve the results. Addition of collagenase did not have detrimental effect on the surrounding cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: With the described method, it is possible to obtain comparable results with MACI. Further studies are also needed to see if it works similarly in humans. BioMed Central 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5941486/ /pubmed/29739464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0823-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gurer, B.
Cabuk, S.
Karakus, O.
Yilmaz, N.
Yilmaz, C.
In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title_full In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title_fullStr In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title_full_unstemmed In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title_short In vivo cartilage tissue engineering
title_sort in vivo cartilage tissue engineering
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0823-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gurerb invivocartilagetissueengineering
AT cabuks invivocartilagetissueengineering
AT karakuso invivocartilagetissueengineering
AT yilmazn invivocartilagetissueengineering
AT yilmazc invivocartilagetissueengineering