Cargando…

Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effectiveness of three interventions that were aimed to reduce non-acute low back pain (LBP) related symptoms in the occupational health setting. METHODS: Based on a survey (n = 2480; response rate 71%) on LBP, we selected a cohort of 193 employees who reported moderate L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rantonen, J., Karppinen, J., Vehtari, A., Luoto, S., Viikari-Juntura, E., Hupli, M., Malmivaara, A., Taimela, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5476-8
_version_ 1783321319066042368
author Rantonen, J.
Karppinen, J.
Vehtari, A.
Luoto, S.
Viikari-Juntura, E.
Hupli, M.
Malmivaara, A.
Taimela, S.
author_facet Rantonen, J.
Karppinen, J.
Vehtari, A.
Luoto, S.
Viikari-Juntura, E.
Hupli, M.
Malmivaara, A.
Taimela, S.
author_sort Rantonen, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed the effectiveness of three interventions that were aimed to reduce non-acute low back pain (LBP) related symptoms in the occupational health setting. METHODS: Based on a survey (n = 2480; response rate 71%) on LBP, we selected a cohort of 193 employees who reported moderate LBP (Visual Analogue Scale VAS > 34 mm) and fulfilled at least one of the following criteria during the past 12 months: sciatica, recurrence of LBP ≥ 2 times, LBP ≥ 2 weeks, or previous sickness absence. A random sample was extracted from the cohort as a control group (Control, n = 50), representing the natural course of LBP. The remaining 143 employees were invited to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of three 1:1:1 allocated parallel intervention arms: multidisciplinary rehabilitation (Rehab, n = 43); progressive exercises (Physio, n = 43) and self-care advice (Advice, n = 40). Seventeen employees declined participation in the intervention. The primary outcome measures were physical impairment (PHI), LBP intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), health related quality of life (QoL), and accumulated sickness absence days. We imputed missing values with multiple imputation procedure. We assessed all comparisons between the intervention groups and the Control group by analysing questionnaire outcomes at 2 years with ANOVA and sickness absence at 4 years by using negative binomial model with a logarithmic link function. RESULTS: Mean differences between the Rehab and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 24 to − 1] for pain intensity, and 0.06 [0.00 to 0.12] for QoL. Mean differences between the Physio and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 29 to 2] for pain intensity, and 0.07 [0.01 to 0.13] for QoL. The main effects sizes were from 0.4 to 0.6. The interventions were not effective in reducing sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: Rehab and Physio interventions improved health related quality of life, decreased low back pain and physical impairment in non-acute, moderate LBP, but we found no differences between the Advice and Control group results. No effectiveness on sickness absence was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number NCT00908102 Clinicaltrials.gov
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59416042018-05-14 Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control Rantonen, J. Karppinen, J. Vehtari, A. Luoto, S. Viikari-Juntura, E. Hupli, M. Malmivaara, A. Taimela, S. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: We assessed the effectiveness of three interventions that were aimed to reduce non-acute low back pain (LBP) related symptoms in the occupational health setting. METHODS: Based on a survey (n = 2480; response rate 71%) on LBP, we selected a cohort of 193 employees who reported moderate LBP (Visual Analogue Scale VAS > 34 mm) and fulfilled at least one of the following criteria during the past 12 months: sciatica, recurrence of LBP ≥ 2 times, LBP ≥ 2 weeks, or previous sickness absence. A random sample was extracted from the cohort as a control group (Control, n = 50), representing the natural course of LBP. The remaining 143 employees were invited to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of three 1:1:1 allocated parallel intervention arms: multidisciplinary rehabilitation (Rehab, n = 43); progressive exercises (Physio, n = 43) and self-care advice (Advice, n = 40). Seventeen employees declined participation in the intervention. The primary outcome measures were physical impairment (PHI), LBP intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), health related quality of life (QoL), and accumulated sickness absence days. We imputed missing values with multiple imputation procedure. We assessed all comparisons between the intervention groups and the Control group by analysing questionnaire outcomes at 2 years with ANOVA and sickness absence at 4 years by using negative binomial model with a logarithmic link function. RESULTS: Mean differences between the Rehab and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 24 to − 1] for pain intensity, and 0.06 [0.00 to 0.12] for QoL. Mean differences between the Physio and Control groups were − 3 [95% CI -5 to − 1] for PHI, − 13 [− 29 to 2] for pain intensity, and 0.07 [0.01 to 0.13] for QoL. The main effects sizes were from 0.4 to 0.6. The interventions were not effective in reducing sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: Rehab and Physio interventions improved health related quality of life, decreased low back pain and physical impairment in non-acute, moderate LBP, but we found no differences between the Advice and Control group results. No effectiveness on sickness absence was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number NCT00908102 Clinicaltrials.gov BioMed Central 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5941604/ /pubmed/29739371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5476-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rantonen, J.
Karppinen, J.
Vehtari, A.
Luoto, S.
Viikari-Juntura, E.
Hupli, M.
Malmivaara, A.
Taimela, S.
Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title_full Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title_fullStr Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title_short Effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
title_sort effectiveness of three interventions for secondary prevention of low back pain in the occupational health setting - a randomised controlled trial with a natural course control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5476-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rantonenj effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT karppinenj effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT vehtaria effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT luotos effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT viikarijunturae effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT huplim effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT malmivaaraa effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol
AT taimelas effectivenessofthreeinterventionsforsecondarypreventionoflowbackpainintheoccupationalhealthsettingarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithanaturalcoursecontrol