Cargando…

The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Rijswijk, Joukje, van Welie, Nienke, Dreyer, Kim, van Hooff, Machiel H. A., de Bruin, Jan Peter, Verhoeve, Harold R., Mol, Femke, Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A., Traas, Maaike A. F., Muijsers, Guido J. J. M., Manger, Arentje P., Gianotten, Judith, de Koning, Cornelia H., Koning, Aafke M. H., Bayram, Neriman, van der Ham, David P., Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M., Kalafusova, Michaela, van de Laar, Bob I. G., Kaijser, Jeroen, van Oostwaard, Miriam F., Meijer, Wouter J., Broekmans, Frank J. M., Valkenburg, Olivier, van der Voet, Lucy F., van Disseldorp, Jeroen, Lambers, Marieke J., Peters, Henrike E., Lier, Marit C. I., Lambalk, Cornelis B., van Wely, Madelon, Bossuyt, Patrick M. M., Stoker, Jaap, van der Veen, Fulco, Mol, Ben W. J., Mijatovic, Velja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6
_version_ 1783321319774879744
author van Rijswijk, Joukje
van Welie, Nienke
Dreyer, Kim
van Hooff, Machiel H. A.
de Bruin, Jan Peter
Verhoeve, Harold R.
Mol, Femke
Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A.
Traas, Maaike A. F.
Muijsers, Guido J. J. M.
Manger, Arentje P.
Gianotten, Judith
de Koning, Cornelia H.
Koning, Aafke M. H.
Bayram, Neriman
van der Ham, David P.
Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M.
Kalafusova, Michaela
van de Laar, Bob I. G.
Kaijser, Jeroen
van Oostwaard, Miriam F.
Meijer, Wouter J.
Broekmans, Frank J. M.
Valkenburg, Olivier
van der Voet, Lucy F.
van Disseldorp, Jeroen
Lambers, Marieke J.
Peters, Henrike E.
Lier, Marit C. I.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
van Wely, Madelon
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Stoker, Jaap
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben W. J.
Mijatovic, Velja
author_facet van Rijswijk, Joukje
van Welie, Nienke
Dreyer, Kim
van Hooff, Machiel H. A.
de Bruin, Jan Peter
Verhoeve, Harold R.
Mol, Femke
Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A.
Traas, Maaike A. F.
Muijsers, Guido J. J. M.
Manger, Arentje P.
Gianotten, Judith
de Koning, Cornelia H.
Koning, Aafke M. H.
Bayram, Neriman
van der Ham, David P.
Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M.
Kalafusova, Michaela
van de Laar, Bob I. G.
Kaijser, Jeroen
van Oostwaard, Miriam F.
Meijer, Wouter J.
Broekmans, Frank J. M.
Valkenburg, Olivier
van der Voet, Lucy F.
van Disseldorp, Jeroen
Lambers, Marieke J.
Peters, Henrike E.
Lier, Marit C. I.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
van Wely, Madelon
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Stoker, Jaap
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben W. J.
Mijatovic, Velja
author_sort van Rijswijk, Joukje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, http://www.trialregister.nl). Date of registration: 19 August 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59416072018-05-14 The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A. de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R. Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A. Traas, Maaike A. F. Muijsers, Guido J. J. M. Manger, Arentje P. Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H. Koning, Aafke M. H. Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P. Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M. Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G. Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F. Meijer, Wouter J. Broekmans, Frank J. M. Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F. van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J. Peters, Henrike E. Lier, Marit C. I. Lambalk, Cornelis B. van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J. Mijatovic, Velja BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, http://www.trialregister.nl). Date of registration: 19 August 2014. BioMed Central 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5941607/ /pubmed/29743106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Rijswijk, Joukje
van Welie, Nienke
Dreyer, Kim
van Hooff, Machiel H. A.
de Bruin, Jan Peter
Verhoeve, Harold R.
Mol, Femke
Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A.
Traas, Maaike A. F.
Muijsers, Guido J. J. M.
Manger, Arentje P.
Gianotten, Judith
de Koning, Cornelia H.
Koning, Aafke M. H.
Bayram, Neriman
van der Ham, David P.
Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M.
Kalafusova, Michaela
van de Laar, Bob I. G.
Kaijser, Jeroen
van Oostwaard, Miriam F.
Meijer, Wouter J.
Broekmans, Frank J. M.
Valkenburg, Olivier
van der Voet, Lucy F.
van Disseldorp, Jeroen
Lambers, Marieke J.
Peters, Henrike E.
Lier, Marit C. I.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
van Wely, Madelon
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Stoker, Jaap
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben W. J.
Mijatovic, Velja
The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort foam study: is hysterosalpingo foam sonography (hyfosy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (hsg) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrijswijkjoukje thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwelienienke thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dreyerkim thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhooffmachielha thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debruinjanpeter thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verhoeveharoldr thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molfemke thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleimanbroezekimikoa thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT traasmaaikeaf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muijsersguidojjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mangerarentjep thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gianottenjudith thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dekoningcorneliah thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koningaafkemh thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bayramneriman thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderhamdavidp thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vrouenraetsfranciscapjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kalafusovamichaela thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandelaarbobig thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaijserjeroen thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanoostwaardmiriamf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meijerwouterj thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broekmansfrankjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT valkenburgolivier thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandervoetlucyf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandisseldorpjeroen thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lambersmariekej thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petershenrikee thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liermaritci thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lambalkcornelisb thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwelymadelon thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bossuytpatrickmm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stokerjaap thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderveenfulco thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molbenwj thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mijatovicvelja thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanrijswijkjoukje foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwelienienke foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dreyerkim foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhooffmachielha foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debruinjanpeter foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verhoeveharoldr foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molfemke foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleimanbroezekimikoa foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT traasmaaikeaf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muijsersguidojjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mangerarentjep foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gianottenjudith foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dekoningcorneliah foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koningaafkemh foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bayramneriman foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderhamdavidp foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vrouenraetsfranciscapjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kalafusovamichaela foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandelaarbobig foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaijserjeroen foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanoostwaardmiriamf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meijerwouterj foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broekmansfrankjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT valkenburgolivier foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandervoetlucyf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandisseldorpjeroen foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lambersmariekej foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT petershenrikee foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liermaritci foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lambalkcornelisb foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwelymadelon foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bossuytpatrickmm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stokerjaap foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderveenfulco foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molbenwj foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mijatovicvelja foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial