Cargando…
The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6 |
_version_ | 1783321319774879744 |
---|---|
author | van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A. de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R. Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A. Traas, Maaike A. F. Muijsers, Guido J. J. M. Manger, Arentje P. Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H. Koning, Aafke M. H. Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P. Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M. Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G. Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F. Meijer, Wouter J. Broekmans, Frank J. M. Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F. van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J. Peters, Henrike E. Lier, Marit C. I. Lambalk, Cornelis B. van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J. Mijatovic, Velja |
author_facet | van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A. de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R. Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A. Traas, Maaike A. F. Muijsers, Guido J. J. M. Manger, Arentje P. Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H. Koning, Aafke M. H. Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P. Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M. Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G. Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F. Meijer, Wouter J. Broekmans, Frank J. M. Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F. van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J. Peters, Henrike E. Lier, Marit C. I. Lambalk, Cornelis B. van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J. Mijatovic, Velja |
author_sort | van Rijswijk, Joukje |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, http://www.trialregister.nl). Date of registration: 19 August 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5941607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59416072018-05-14 The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A. de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R. Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A. Traas, Maaike A. F. Muijsers, Guido J. J. M. Manger, Arentje P. Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H. Koning, Aafke M. H. Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P. Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M. Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G. Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F. Meijer, Wouter J. Broekmans, Frank J. M. Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F. van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J. Peters, Henrike E. Lier, Marit C. I. Lambalk, Cornelis B. van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J. Mijatovic, Velja BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, http://www.trialregister.nl). Date of registration: 19 August 2014. BioMed Central 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5941607/ /pubmed/29743106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A. de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R. Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A. Traas, Maaike A. F. Muijsers, Guido J. J. M. Manger, Arentje P. Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H. Koning, Aafke M. H. Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P. Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M. Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G. Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F. Meijer, Wouter J. Broekmans, Frank J. M. Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F. van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J. Peters, Henrike E. Lier, Marit C. I. Lambalk, Cornelis B. van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J. Mijatovic, Velja The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | foam study: is hysterosalpingo foam sonography (hyfosy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (hsg) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrijswijkjoukje thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanwelienienke thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dreyerkim thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanhooffmachielha thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debruinjanpeter thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verhoeveharoldr thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molfemke thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kleimanbroezekimikoa thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT traasmaaikeaf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muijsersguidojjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mangerarentjep thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gianottenjudith thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dekoningcorneliah thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koningaafkemh thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bayramneriman thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderhamdavidp thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vrouenraetsfranciscapjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kalafusovamichaela thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandelaarbobig thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaijserjeroen thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanoostwaardmiriamf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meijerwouterj thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT broekmansfrankjm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT valkenburgolivier thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandervoetlucyf thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandisseldorpjeroen thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lambersmariekej thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT petershenrikee thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liermaritci thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lambalkcornelisb thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanwelymadelon thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bossuytpatrickmm thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stokerjaap thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderveenfulco thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molbenwj thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mijatovicvelja thefoamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanrijswijkjoukje foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanwelienienke foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dreyerkim foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanhooffmachielha foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debruinjanpeter foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verhoeveharoldr foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molfemke foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kleimanbroezekimikoa foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT traasmaaikeaf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muijsersguidojjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mangerarentjep foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gianottenjudith foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dekoningcorneliah foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koningaafkemh foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bayramneriman foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderhamdavidp foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vrouenraetsfranciscapjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kalafusovamichaela foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandelaarbobig foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaijserjeroen foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanoostwaardmiriamf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meijerwouterj foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT broekmansfrankjm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT valkenburgolivier foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandervoetlucyf foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandisseldorpjeroen foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lambersmariekej foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT petershenrikee foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liermaritci foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lambalkcornelisb foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanwelymadelon foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bossuytpatrickmm foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stokerjaap foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderveenfulco foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molbenwj foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mijatovicvelja foamstudyishysterosalpingofoamsonographyhyfosyacosteffectivealternativeforhysterosalpingographyhsginassessingtubalpatencyinsubfertilewomenstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |