Cargando…
Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making?
Historically, research and development (R&D) in the pharmaceutical sector has predominantly been an in-house activity. To enable investments for game changing late-stage assets and to enable better and less costly go/no-go decisions, most companies have employed a fail early paradigm through the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1499-2 |
_version_ | 1783321327109668864 |
---|---|
author | Schuhmacher, Alexander Gassmann, Oliver McCracken, Nigel Hinder, Markus |
author_facet | Schuhmacher, Alexander Gassmann, Oliver McCracken, Nigel Hinder, Markus |
author_sort | Schuhmacher, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Historically, research and development (R&D) in the pharmaceutical sector has predominantly been an in-house activity. To enable investments for game changing late-stage assets and to enable better and less costly go/no-go decisions, most companies have employed a fail early paradigm through the implementation of clinical proof-of-concept organizations. To fuel their pipelines, some pioneers started to complement their internal R&D efforts through collaborations as early as the 1990s. In recent years, multiple extrinsic and intrinsic factors induced an opening for external sources of innovation and resulted in new models for open innovation, such as open sourcing, crowdsourcing, public–private partnerships, innovations centres, and the virtualization of R&D. Three factors seem to determine the breadth and depth regarding how companies approach external innovation: (1) the company’s legacy, (2) the company’s willingness and ability to take risks and (3) the company’s need to control IP and competitors. In addition, these factors often constitute the major hurdles to effectively leveraging external opportunities and assets. Conscious and differential choices of the R&D and business models for different companies and different divisions in the same company seem to best allow a company to fully exploit the potential of both internal and external innovations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5941640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59416402018-05-14 Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? Schuhmacher, Alexander Gassmann, Oliver McCracken, Nigel Hinder, Markus J Transl Med Review Historically, research and development (R&D) in the pharmaceutical sector has predominantly been an in-house activity. To enable investments for game changing late-stage assets and to enable better and less costly go/no-go decisions, most companies have employed a fail early paradigm through the implementation of clinical proof-of-concept organizations. To fuel their pipelines, some pioneers started to complement their internal R&D efforts through collaborations as early as the 1990s. In recent years, multiple extrinsic and intrinsic factors induced an opening for external sources of innovation and resulted in new models for open innovation, such as open sourcing, crowdsourcing, public–private partnerships, innovations centres, and the virtualization of R&D. Three factors seem to determine the breadth and depth regarding how companies approach external innovation: (1) the company’s legacy, (2) the company’s willingness and ability to take risks and (3) the company’s need to control IP and competitors. In addition, these factors often constitute the major hurdles to effectively leveraging external opportunities and assets. Conscious and differential choices of the R&D and business models for different companies and different divisions in the same company seem to best allow a company to fully exploit the potential of both internal and external innovations. BioMed Central 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5941640/ /pubmed/29739427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1499-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Schuhmacher, Alexander Gassmann, Oliver McCracken, Nigel Hinder, Markus Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title | Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title_full | Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title_fullStr | Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title_full_unstemmed | Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title_short | Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? |
title_sort | open innovation and external sources of innovation. an opportunity to fuel the r&d pipeline and enhance decision making? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1499-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schuhmacheralexander openinnovationandexternalsourcesofinnovationanopportunitytofueltherdpipelineandenhancedecisionmaking AT gassmannoliver openinnovationandexternalsourcesofinnovationanopportunitytofueltherdpipelineandenhancedecisionmaking AT mccrackennigel openinnovationandexternalsourcesofinnovationanopportunitytofueltherdpipelineandenhancedecisionmaking AT hindermarkus openinnovationandexternalsourcesofinnovationanopportunitytofueltherdpipelineandenhancedecisionmaking |