Cargando…

An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions

BACKGROUND: Operative endoscopy and flexible fiber-optic in-office tissue biopsy are common techniques to assess suspicious laryngopharyngeal lesions. METHODS: The primary outcome was the delay to the initiation of treatment. Secondary outcomes were delay to biopsy, histopathological diagnosis, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Francisco, Smith, Kristine A., Chandarana, Shamir, Matthews, T. Wayne, Bosch, J. Douglas, Nakoneshny, Steven C., Dort, Joseph C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0275-x
_version_ 1783321327555313664
author Lee, Francisco
Smith, Kristine A.
Chandarana, Shamir
Matthews, T. Wayne
Bosch, J. Douglas
Nakoneshny, Steven C.
Dort, Joseph C.
author_facet Lee, Francisco
Smith, Kristine A.
Chandarana, Shamir
Matthews, T. Wayne
Bosch, J. Douglas
Nakoneshny, Steven C.
Dort, Joseph C.
author_sort Lee, Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Operative endoscopy and flexible fiber-optic in-office tissue biopsy are common techniques to assess suspicious laryngopharyngeal lesions. METHODS: The primary outcome was the delay to the initiation of treatment. Secondary outcomes were delay to biopsy, histopathological diagnosis, and assessment at a multidisciplinary oncology clinic. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the relative delays between these approaches to biopsy of laryngopharyngeal lesions. RESULTS: There were 114 patients in the study cohort; 44 in-office and 70 operative endoscopic biopsies). The mean delay from consultation to biopsy was 17.4 days for the operative endoscopy group and 1.3 days for the in-office group. The mean delay from initial otolaryngology consultation to initiation of treatment was 51.7 days and 44.6 days for the operative endoscopy and in-office groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In-office biopsy reduced the time from initial consultation to biopsy. The temporal gains via in-office biopsy did not translate into faster access to treatment. This outcome highlights the opportunity to improve access to treatment for patients with early diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59416422018-05-14 An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions Lee, Francisco Smith, Kristine A. Chandarana, Shamir Matthews, T. Wayne Bosch, J. Douglas Nakoneshny, Steven C. Dort, Joseph C. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Operative endoscopy and flexible fiber-optic in-office tissue biopsy are common techniques to assess suspicious laryngopharyngeal lesions. METHODS: The primary outcome was the delay to the initiation of treatment. Secondary outcomes were delay to biopsy, histopathological diagnosis, and assessment at a multidisciplinary oncology clinic. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the relative delays between these approaches to biopsy of laryngopharyngeal lesions. RESULTS: There were 114 patients in the study cohort; 44 in-office and 70 operative endoscopic biopsies). The mean delay from consultation to biopsy was 17.4 days for the operative endoscopy group and 1.3 days for the in-office group. The mean delay from initial otolaryngology consultation to initiation of treatment was 51.7 days and 44.6 days for the operative endoscopy and in-office groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In-office biopsy reduced the time from initial consultation to biopsy. The temporal gains via in-office biopsy did not translate into faster access to treatment. This outcome highlights the opportunity to improve access to treatment for patients with early diagnosis. BioMed Central 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5941642/ /pubmed/29739442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0275-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lee, Francisco
Smith, Kristine A.
Chandarana, Shamir
Matthews, T. Wayne
Bosch, J. Douglas
Nakoneshny, Steven C.
Dort, Joseph C.
An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title_full An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title_fullStr An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title_short An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
title_sort evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-018-0275-x
work_keys_str_mv AT leefrancisco anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT smithkristinea anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT chandaranashamir anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT matthewstwayne anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT boschjdouglas anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT nakoneshnystevenc anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT dortjosephc anevaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT leefrancisco evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT smithkristinea evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT chandaranashamir evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT matthewstwayne evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT boschjdouglas evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT nakoneshnystevenc evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions
AT dortjosephc evaluationofinofficeflexiblefiberopticbiopsiesforlaryngopharyngeallesions