Cargando…

How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?

BACKGROUND: For young people with long-term conditions, transition from child to adult-oriented health services is a critical period which, if not managed well, may lead to poor outcomes. There are features of transition services which guidance and research suggest improve outcomes. We studied nine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colver, A., Pearse, R., Watson, R. M., Fay, M., Rapley, T., Mann, K. D., Le Couteur, A., Parr, J. R., McConachie, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9
_version_ 1783321328743350272
author Colver, A.
Pearse, R.
Watson, R. M.
Fay, M.
Rapley, T.
Mann, K. D.
Le Couteur, A.
Parr, J. R.
McConachie, H.
author_facet Colver, A.
Pearse, R.
Watson, R. M.
Fay, M.
Rapley, T.
Mann, K. D.
Le Couteur, A.
Parr, J. R.
McConachie, H.
author_sort Colver, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For young people with long-term conditions, transition from child to adult-oriented health services is a critical period which, if not managed well, may lead to poor outcomes. There are features of transition services which guidance and research suggest improve outcomes. We studied nine such features, calling them ‘proposed beneficial features’: age-banded clinic; meet adult team before transfer; promotion of health self-efficacy; written transition plan; appropriate parent involvement; key worker; coordinated team; holistic life-skills training; transition manager for clinical team. We aimed to describe the extent to which service providers offer these nine features, and to compare this with young people’s reported experience of them. METHODS: A longitudinal, mixed methods study followed 374 young people as their care moved from child to adult health services. Participants had type 1 diabetes, cerebral palsy or autism spectrum disorder with additional mental health difficulties. Data are reported from the first two visits, one year apart. RESULTS: Three hundred four (81.3%) of the young people took part in the second visit (128 with diabetes, 91 with autism, 85 with cerebral palsy). Overall, the nine proposed beneficial features of transition services were poorly provided. Fewer than half of services stated they provided an age-banded clinic, written transition plan, transition manager for clinical team, a protocol for promotion of health self-efficacy, or holistic life-skills training. To varying degrees, young people reported that they had not experienced the features which services said they provided. For instance, the agreement for written transition plan, holistic life-skills training and key worker, was 30, 43 and 49% respectively. Agreement was better for appropriate parent involvement, age-banded clinic, promotion of health self-efficacy and coordinated team at 77, 77, 80 and 69% respectively. Variation in the meaning of the features as experienced by young people and families was evident from qualitative interviews and observations. CONCLUSIONS: UK services provide only some of the nine proposed beneficial features for supporting healthcare transition of young people with long term conditions. Observational studies or trials which examine the influence of features of transition services on outcomes should ensure that the experiences of young people and families are captured, and not rely on service specifications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59416472018-05-14 How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition? Colver, A. Pearse, R. Watson, R. M. Fay, M. Rapley, T. Mann, K. D. Le Couteur, A. Parr, J. R. McConachie, H. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: For young people with long-term conditions, transition from child to adult-oriented health services is a critical period which, if not managed well, may lead to poor outcomes. There are features of transition services which guidance and research suggest improve outcomes. We studied nine such features, calling them ‘proposed beneficial features’: age-banded clinic; meet adult team before transfer; promotion of health self-efficacy; written transition plan; appropriate parent involvement; key worker; coordinated team; holistic life-skills training; transition manager for clinical team. We aimed to describe the extent to which service providers offer these nine features, and to compare this with young people’s reported experience of them. METHODS: A longitudinal, mixed methods study followed 374 young people as their care moved from child to adult health services. Participants had type 1 diabetes, cerebral palsy or autism spectrum disorder with additional mental health difficulties. Data are reported from the first two visits, one year apart. RESULTS: Three hundred four (81.3%) of the young people took part in the second visit (128 with diabetes, 91 with autism, 85 with cerebral palsy). Overall, the nine proposed beneficial features of transition services were poorly provided. Fewer than half of services stated they provided an age-banded clinic, written transition plan, transition manager for clinical team, a protocol for promotion of health self-efficacy, or holistic life-skills training. To varying degrees, young people reported that they had not experienced the features which services said they provided. For instance, the agreement for written transition plan, holistic life-skills training and key worker, was 30, 43 and 49% respectively. Agreement was better for appropriate parent involvement, age-banded clinic, promotion of health self-efficacy and coordinated team at 77, 77, 80 and 69% respectively. Variation in the meaning of the features as experienced by young people and families was evident from qualitative interviews and observations. CONCLUSIONS: UK services provide only some of the nine proposed beneficial features for supporting healthcare transition of young people with long term conditions. Observational studies or trials which examine the influence of features of transition services on outcomes should ensure that the experiences of young people and families are captured, and not rely on service specifications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5941647/ /pubmed/29739396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colver, A.
Pearse, R.
Watson, R. M.
Fay, M.
Rapley, T.
Mann, K. D.
Le Couteur, A.
Parr, J. R.
McConachie, H.
How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title_full How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title_fullStr How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title_full_unstemmed How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title_short How well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
title_sort how well do services for young people with long term conditions deliver features proposed to improve transition?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3168-9
work_keys_str_mv AT colvera howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT pearser howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT watsonrm howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT faym howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT rapleyt howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT mannkd howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT lecouteura howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT parrjr howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT mcconachieh howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition
AT howwelldoservicesforyoungpeoplewithlongtermconditionsdeliverfeaturesproposedtoimprovetransition