Cargando…
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: A recent study by Page et al. (PLoS Med. 2016;13(5):e1002028) claimed that increasing numbers of reviews are being published and many are poorly-conducted and reported. The aim of the present study was to assess how well reporting standards of systematic reviews produced in a Health Tech...
Autores principales: | Carroll, Christopher, Kaltenthaler, Eva |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0498-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A qualitative study of manufacturers' submissions to the UK NICE single technology appraisal process
por: Kaltenthaler, Eva C, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection
por: Carroll, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking
por: Preston, Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies
por: Kaltenthaler, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process
por: Kaltenthaler, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2016)