Cargando…

Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by pooling the open published data. Methods. An electronic search of databases Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Embase CBM, and CNKI were performed by two reviewers (Ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanqing, Han, Cheng, Dong, Ling, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29756052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2018-0026
_version_ 1783321339878178816
author Yanqing, Han
Cheng, Dong
Ling, Xu
author_facet Yanqing, Han
Cheng, Dong
Ling, Xu
author_sort Yanqing, Han
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by pooling the open published data. Methods. An electronic search of databases Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Embase CBM, and CNKI were performed by two reviewers (Han Yanqing, Dong Cheng) independently to identify the studies relevant to serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The patient number of true positive(tp), false positive(fp), false negative(fn) and true negative(tn) were extracted from each included study. The diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer was assessed by pooled sensitivity, specificity and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC). All the data was pooled by MetaDiSc 1.4 and Stata/SE 11.0 statistical software. Results A total of 22 studies with 2474 colorectal patients and 1576 controls were included in the present study and meta-analysis. The combined diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.50 (95%CI:0.48-0.52) and 0.86 (95%CI:0.84-0.88) for serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio were 3.41(95%CI:2.57-4.53) and 0.62(0.55-0.71). The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.73. Deeks’funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test (p=0.49) showed no significant publication bias in the present meta-analysis. Conclusion Due toits low diagnostic sensitivity, the diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker for colorectal cancer screening is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59417062018-05-11 Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis Yanqing, Han Cheng, Dong Ling, Xu Open Med (Wars) Regular Articles The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by pooling the open published data. Methods. An electronic search of databases Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Embase CBM, and CNKI were performed by two reviewers (Han Yanqing, Dong Cheng) independently to identify the studies relevant to serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The patient number of true positive(tp), false positive(fp), false negative(fn) and true negative(tn) were extracted from each included study. The diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer was assessed by pooled sensitivity, specificity and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC). All the data was pooled by MetaDiSc 1.4 and Stata/SE 11.0 statistical software. Results A total of 22 studies with 2474 colorectal patients and 1576 controls were included in the present study and meta-analysis. The combined diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.50 (95%CI:0.48-0.52) and 0.86 (95%CI:0.84-0.88) for serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio were 3.41(95%CI:2.57-4.53) and 0.62(0.55-0.71). The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.73. Deeks’funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test (p=0.49) showed no significant publication bias in the present meta-analysis. Conclusion Due toits low diagnostic sensitivity, the diagnostic performance of serum CA72-4 as a biomarker for colorectal cancer screening is limited. De Gruyter Open 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5941706/ /pubmed/29756052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2018-0026 Text en © 2018 Han Yanqing et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Yanqing, Han
Cheng, Dong
Ling, Xu
Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title_full Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title_short Serum CA72-4 as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
title_sort serum ca72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29756052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2018-0026
work_keys_str_mv AT yanqinghan serumca724asabiomarkerinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT chengdong serumca724asabiomarkerinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT lingxu serumca724asabiomarkerinthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerametaanalysis