Cargando…

Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) crowding adversely affects multiple facets of high-quality care. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts mandates specific, hospital action plans to reduce ED boarding via a mechanism termed “Code Help.” Because implementation appears inconsistent even when hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael, Sean S., Broach, John P., Kotkowski, Kevin A., Brush, D. Eric, Volturo, Gregory A., Reznek, Martin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760848
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.1.36641
_version_ 1783321394480676864
author Michael, Sean S.
Broach, John P.
Kotkowski, Kevin A.
Brush, D. Eric
Volturo, Gregory A.
Reznek, Martin A.
author_facet Michael, Sean S.
Broach, John P.
Kotkowski, Kevin A.
Brush, D. Eric
Volturo, Gregory A.
Reznek, Martin A.
author_sort Michael, Sean S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) crowding adversely affects multiple facets of high-quality care. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts mandates specific, hospital action plans to reduce ED boarding via a mechanism termed “Code Help.” Because implementation appears inconsistent even when hospital conditions should have triggered its activation, we hypothesized that compliance with the Code Help policy would be associated with reduction in ED boarding time and total ED length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients, compared to patients seen when the Code Help policy was not followed. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from electronic, patient-care, timestamp events and from a prospective Code Help registry for consecutive adult patients admitted from the ED at a single academic center during a 15-month period. For each patient, we determined whether the concurrent hospital status complied with the Code Help policy or violated it at the time of admission decision. We then compared ED boarding time and overall ED LOS for patients cared for during periods of Code Help policy compliance and during periods of Code Help policy violation, both with reference to patients cared for during normal operations. RESULTS: Of 89,587 adult patients who presented to the ED during the study period, 24,017 (26.8%) were admitted to an acute care or critical care bed. Boarding time ranged from zero to 67 hours 30 minutes (median 4 hours 31 minutes). Total ED LOS for admitted patients ranged from 11 minutes to 85 hours 25 minutes (median nine hours). Patients admitted during periods of Code Help policy violation experienced significantly longer boarding times (median 20 minutes longer) and total ED LOS (median 46 minutes longer), compared to patients admitted under normal operations. However, patients admitted during Code Help policy compliance did not experience a significant increase in either metric, compared to normal operations. CONCLUSION: In this single-center experience, implementation of the Massachusetts Code Help regulation was associated with reduced ED boarding time and ED LOS when the policy was consistently followed, but there were adverse effects on both metrics during violations of the policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5942017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59420172018-05-14 Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding? Michael, Sean S. Broach, John P. Kotkowski, Kevin A. Brush, D. Eric Volturo, Gregory A. Reznek, Martin A. West J Emerg Med Emergency Department Administration INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) crowding adversely affects multiple facets of high-quality care. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts mandates specific, hospital action plans to reduce ED boarding via a mechanism termed “Code Help.” Because implementation appears inconsistent even when hospital conditions should have triggered its activation, we hypothesized that compliance with the Code Help policy would be associated with reduction in ED boarding time and total ED length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients, compared to patients seen when the Code Help policy was not followed. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from electronic, patient-care, timestamp events and from a prospective Code Help registry for consecutive adult patients admitted from the ED at a single academic center during a 15-month period. For each patient, we determined whether the concurrent hospital status complied with the Code Help policy or violated it at the time of admission decision. We then compared ED boarding time and overall ED LOS for patients cared for during periods of Code Help policy compliance and during periods of Code Help policy violation, both with reference to patients cared for during normal operations. RESULTS: Of 89,587 adult patients who presented to the ED during the study period, 24,017 (26.8%) were admitted to an acute care or critical care bed. Boarding time ranged from zero to 67 hours 30 minutes (median 4 hours 31 minutes). Total ED LOS for admitted patients ranged from 11 minutes to 85 hours 25 minutes (median nine hours). Patients admitted during periods of Code Help policy violation experienced significantly longer boarding times (median 20 minutes longer) and total ED LOS (median 46 minutes longer), compared to patients admitted under normal operations. However, patients admitted during Code Help policy compliance did not experience a significant increase in either metric, compared to normal operations. CONCLUSION: In this single-center experience, implementation of the Massachusetts Code Help regulation was associated with reduced ED boarding time and ED LOS when the policy was consistently followed, but there were adverse effects on both metrics during violations of the policy. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2018-05 2018-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5942017/ /pubmed/29760848 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.1.36641 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Michael et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Department Administration
Michael, Sean S.
Broach, John P.
Kotkowski, Kevin A.
Brush, D. Eric
Volturo, Gregory A.
Reznek, Martin A.
Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title_full Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title_fullStr Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title_full_unstemmed Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title_short Code Help: Can This Unique State Regulatory Intervention Improve Emergency Department Crowding?
title_sort code help: can this unique state regulatory intervention improve emergency department crowding?
topic Emergency Department Administration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760848
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.1.36641
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelseans codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding
AT broachjohnp codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding
AT kotkowskikevina codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding
AT brushderic codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding
AT volturogregorya codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding
AT reznekmartina codehelpcanthisuniquestateregulatoryinterventionimproveemergencydepartmentcrowding