Cargando…

Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Eptifibatide is a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist used for the prevention of cardiac ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eptifibatide has been used with bolus dose only or bolus plus infusion in patients undergoing PCI which have shown l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doustkami, Hossein, Sadeghieh Ahari, Saeed, Irani Jam, Effat, Habibzadeh, Afshin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755628
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr675w
_version_ 1783321431713513472
author Doustkami, Hossein
Sadeghieh Ahari, Saeed
Irani Jam, Effat
Habibzadeh, Afshin
author_facet Doustkami, Hossein
Sadeghieh Ahari, Saeed
Irani Jam, Effat
Habibzadeh, Afshin
author_sort Doustkami, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eptifibatide is a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist used for the prevention of cardiac ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eptifibatide has been used with bolus dose only or bolus plus infusion in patients undergoing PCI which have shown less complications, but the risk of bleeding has been increased. We aimed to compare the outcome and bleeding rate of bolus dose alone or plus infusion in elective PCI. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, we compared the outcome of elective PCI following single bolus dose intracoronary (41 patients) or bolus plus intravenous infusion (19 patients) of eptifibatide. In-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and bleeding rate were recorded and evaluated between groups. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding baseline findings. Bolus only compared to bolus plus infusion group had lower in-hospital (19.5% vs. 31.6%) and follow-up MACE (15.4% vs. 17.6%), lower bleeding in-hospital (14.6% vs. 21.1%) and follow-up (2.4% vs. 5.3%) as well as lower mortality rate in hospital (4.9% vs. 15.8%), but higher follow-up mortality (10.3% vs. 0), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no significant difference regarding bleeding or MACE between intracoronary bolus infusion and bolus plus intravenous infusion of eptifibatide. It seems intracoronary bolus infusion of eptifibatide due to use of lower doses is a better choice in elective PCI to prevent post-PCI MACE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5942240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59422402018-05-11 Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Doustkami, Hossein Sadeghieh Ahari, Saeed Irani Jam, Effat Habibzadeh, Afshin Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Eptifibatide is a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist used for the prevention of cardiac ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eptifibatide has been used with bolus dose only or bolus plus infusion in patients undergoing PCI which have shown less complications, but the risk of bleeding has been increased. We aimed to compare the outcome and bleeding rate of bolus dose alone or plus infusion in elective PCI. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, we compared the outcome of elective PCI following single bolus dose intracoronary (41 patients) or bolus plus intravenous infusion (19 patients) of eptifibatide. In-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and bleeding rate were recorded and evaluated between groups. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding baseline findings. Bolus only compared to bolus plus infusion group had lower in-hospital (19.5% vs. 31.6%) and follow-up MACE (15.4% vs. 17.6%), lower bleeding in-hospital (14.6% vs. 21.1%) and follow-up (2.4% vs. 5.3%) as well as lower mortality rate in hospital (4.9% vs. 15.8%), but higher follow-up mortality (10.3% vs. 0), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no significant difference regarding bleeding or MACE between intracoronary bolus infusion and bolus plus intravenous infusion of eptifibatide. It seems intracoronary bolus infusion of eptifibatide due to use of lower doses is a better choice in elective PCI to prevent post-PCI MACE. Elmer Press 2018-04 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5942240/ /pubmed/29755628 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr675w Text en Copyright 2018, Doustkami et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Doustkami, Hossein
Sadeghieh Ahari, Saeed
Irani Jam, Effat
Habibzadeh, Afshin
Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort eptifibatide bolus dose during elective percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755628
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr675w
work_keys_str_mv AT doustkamihossein eptifibatidebolusdoseduringelectivepercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT sadeghiehaharisaeed eptifibatidebolusdoseduringelectivepercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT iranijameffat eptifibatidebolusdoseduringelectivepercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT habibzadehafshin eptifibatidebolusdoseduringelectivepercutaneouscoronaryintervention