Cargando…
Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469 |
_version_ | 1783321465143164928 |
---|---|
author | Fasugba, Oyebola Cheng, Allen C Russo, Philip L Northcote, Maria Rosebrock, Hannah Mitchell, Brett G |
author_facet | Fasugba, Oyebola Cheng, Allen C Russo, Philip L Northcote, Maria Rosebrock, Hannah Mitchell, Brett G |
author_sort | Fasugba, Oyebola |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal warrant investigation. The study’s objectives are to examine the efficacy of an electronic reminder system, the CATH TAG, in reducing urinary catheter use (device utilisation ratio) and to determine the effect of the CATH TAG on nurses’ ability to deliver patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a mixed methods approach in which both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected. A stepped wedge randomised controlled design in which wards provide before and after observations will be undertaken in one large Australian hospital over 24 weeks. The intervention is the use of the CATH TAG. Eligible hospital wards will receive the intervention and act as their own control, with analysis undertaken of the change within each ward using data collected in control and intervention periods. An online survey will be administered to nurses on study completion, and a focus group for nurses will be conducted 2 months after study completion. The primary outcomes are the urinary catheter device utilisation ratio and perceptions of nurses about ease of use of the CATH TAG. Secondary outcomes include a reduced number of cases of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria, a reduced number of urinary catheters inserted per 100 patient admissions, perceptions of nurses regarding effectiveness of the CATH TAG, changes in ownership/interest by patients in catheter management, as well as possible barriers to successful implementation of the CATH TAG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committees of Avondale College of Higher Education (2017:15) and Queensland Health (HREC17QTHS19). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001191381 (Pre-results). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5942409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59424092018-05-11 Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia Fasugba, Oyebola Cheng, Allen C Russo, Philip L Northcote, Maria Rosebrock, Hannah Mitchell, Brett G BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal warrant investigation. The study’s objectives are to examine the efficacy of an electronic reminder system, the CATH TAG, in reducing urinary catheter use (device utilisation ratio) and to determine the effect of the CATH TAG on nurses’ ability to deliver patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a mixed methods approach in which both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected. A stepped wedge randomised controlled design in which wards provide before and after observations will be undertaken in one large Australian hospital over 24 weeks. The intervention is the use of the CATH TAG. Eligible hospital wards will receive the intervention and act as their own control, with analysis undertaken of the change within each ward using data collected in control and intervention periods. An online survey will be administered to nurses on study completion, and a focus group for nurses will be conducted 2 months after study completion. The primary outcomes are the urinary catheter device utilisation ratio and perceptions of nurses about ease of use of the CATH TAG. Secondary outcomes include a reduced number of cases of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria, a reduced number of urinary catheters inserted per 100 patient admissions, perceptions of nurses regarding effectiveness of the CATH TAG, changes in ownership/interest by patients in catheter management, as well as possible barriers to successful implementation of the CATH TAG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committees of Avondale College of Higher Education (2017:15) and Queensland Health (HREC17QTHS19). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001191381 (Pre-results). BMJ Publishing Group 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5942409/ /pubmed/29743326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Nursing Fasugba, Oyebola Cheng, Allen C Russo, Philip L Northcote, Maria Rosebrock, Hannah Mitchell, Brett G Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title | Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title_full | Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title_fullStr | Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title_short | Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia |
title_sort | reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in australia |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fasugbaoyebola reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia AT chengallenc reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia AT russophilipl reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia AT northcotemaria reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia AT rosebrockhannah reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia AT mitchellbrettg reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia |