Cargando…

Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fasugba, Oyebola, Cheng, Allen C, Russo, Philip L, Northcote, Maria, Rosebrock, Hannah, Mitchell, Brett G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469
_version_ 1783321465143164928
author Fasugba, Oyebola
Cheng, Allen C
Russo, Philip L
Northcote, Maria
Rosebrock, Hannah
Mitchell, Brett G
author_facet Fasugba, Oyebola
Cheng, Allen C
Russo, Philip L
Northcote, Maria
Rosebrock, Hannah
Mitchell, Brett G
author_sort Fasugba, Oyebola
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal warrant investigation. The study’s objectives are to examine the efficacy of an electronic reminder system, the CATH TAG, in reducing urinary catheter use (device utilisation ratio) and to determine the effect of the CATH TAG on nurses’ ability to deliver patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a mixed methods approach in which both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected. A stepped wedge randomised controlled design in which wards provide before and after observations will be undertaken in one large Australian hospital over 24 weeks. The intervention is the use of the CATH TAG. Eligible hospital wards will receive the intervention and act as their own control, with analysis undertaken of the change within each ward using data collected in control and intervention periods. An online survey will be administered to nurses on study completion, and a focus group for nurses will be conducted 2 months after study completion. The primary outcomes are the urinary catheter device utilisation ratio and perceptions of nurses about ease of use of the CATH TAG. Secondary outcomes include a reduced number of cases of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria, a reduced number of urinary catheters inserted per 100 patient admissions, perceptions of nurses regarding effectiveness of the CATH TAG, changes in ownership/interest by patients in catheter management, as well as possible barriers to successful implementation of the CATH TAG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committees of Avondale College of Higher Education (2017:15) and Queensland Health (HREC17QTHS19). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001191381 (Pre-results).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5942409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59424092018-05-11 Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia Fasugba, Oyebola Cheng, Allen C Russo, Philip L Northcote, Maria Rosebrock, Hannah Mitchell, Brett G BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in infection prevention and control, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are common and remain problematic. Prolonged urinary catheterisation is the main risk factor for development of CAUTIs; hence, interventions that target early catheter removal warrant investigation. The study’s objectives are to examine the efficacy of an electronic reminder system, the CATH TAG, in reducing urinary catheter use (device utilisation ratio) and to determine the effect of the CATH TAG on nurses’ ability to deliver patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a mixed methods approach in which both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected. A stepped wedge randomised controlled design in which wards provide before and after observations will be undertaken in one large Australian hospital over 24 weeks. The intervention is the use of the CATH TAG. Eligible hospital wards will receive the intervention and act as their own control, with analysis undertaken of the change within each ward using data collected in control and intervention periods. An online survey will be administered to nurses on study completion, and a focus group for nurses will be conducted 2 months after study completion. The primary outcomes are the urinary catheter device utilisation ratio and perceptions of nurses about ease of use of the CATH TAG. Secondary outcomes include a reduced number of cases of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria, a reduced number of urinary catheters inserted per 100 patient admissions, perceptions of nurses regarding effectiveness of the CATH TAG, changes in ownership/interest by patients in catheter management, as well as possible barriers to successful implementation of the CATH TAG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committees of Avondale College of Higher Education (2017:15) and Queensland Health (HREC17QTHS19). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001191381 (Pre-results). BMJ Publishing Group 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5942409/ /pubmed/29743326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Fasugba, Oyebola
Cheng, Allen C
Russo, Philip L
Northcote, Maria
Rosebrock, Hannah
Mitchell, Brett G
Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title_full Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title_fullStr Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title_short Reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in Australia
title_sort reducing urinary catheter use: a protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of an electronic reminder system in hospitalised patients in australia
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020469
work_keys_str_mv AT fasugbaoyebola reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia
AT chengallenc reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia
AT russophilipl reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia
AT northcotemaria reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia
AT rosebrockhannah reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia
AT mitchellbrettg reducingurinarycatheteruseaprotocolforamixedmethodsevaluationofanelectronicremindersysteminhospitalisedpatientsinaustralia