Cargando…

Glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) for detection of diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose in Malawi: a diagnostic accuracy study

OBJECTIVES: To examine the accuracy of glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) in detecting type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among adults living in Malawi. DESIGN: A diagnostic validation study of HbA(1c). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/L was the reference standard for type 2 diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rathod, Sujit D, Crampin, Amelia C, Musicha, Crispin, Kayuni, Ndoliwe, Banda, Louis, Saul, Jacqueline, McLean, Estelle, Branson, Keith, Jaffar, Shabbar, Nyirenda, Moffat J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29730628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020972
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To examine the accuracy of glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) in detecting type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among adults living in Malawi. DESIGN: A diagnostic validation study of HbA(1c). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/L was the reference standard for type 2 diabetes, and FPG between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L as impaired fasting glucose. PARTICIPANTS: 3645 adults (of whom 63% were women) recruited from two demographic surveillance study sites in urban and rural Malawi. This analysis excluded those who had a previous diagnosis of diabetes or had history of taking diabetes medication. RESULTS: HbA(1c) demonstrated excellent validity to detect FPG-defined diabetes, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.94). At HbA(1c) ≥6.5% (140 mg/dL), sensitivity was 78.7% and specificity was 94.0%. Subgroup AUROCs ranged from 0.86 for participants with anaemia to 0.94 for participants in urban Malawi. There were clinical and metabolic differences between participants with true diabetes versus false positives when HbA(1c) was ≥6.5% (140 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study provide justification to use HbA(1c) to detect type 2 diabetes. As HbA(1c) testing is substantially less burdensome to patients than either FPG testing or oral glucose tolerance testing, it represents a useful option for expanding access to diabetes care in sub-Saharan Africa.