Cargando…

Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK

OBJECTIVES: Digital interventions can change patients’ experiences of managing their health, either creating additional burden or improving their experience of healthcare. This qualitative study aimed to explore perceived burdens and benefits for patients using a digital self-management intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morton, Katherine, Dennison, Laura, Bradbury, Katherine, Band, Rebecca Jane, May, Carl, Raftery, James, Little, Paul, McManus, Richard J, Yardley, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020843
_version_ 1783321466551402496
author Morton, Katherine
Dennison, Laura
Bradbury, Katherine
Band, Rebecca Jane
May, Carl
Raftery, James
Little, Paul
McManus, Richard J
Yardley, Lucy
author_facet Morton, Katherine
Dennison, Laura
Bradbury, Katherine
Band, Rebecca Jane
May, Carl
Raftery, James
Little, Paul
McManus, Richard J
Yardley, Lucy
author_sort Morton, Katherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Digital interventions can change patients’ experiences of managing their health, either creating additional burden or improving their experience of healthcare. This qualitative study aimed to explore perceived burdens and benefits for patients using a digital self-management intervention for reducing high blood pressure. A secondary aim was to further our understanding of how best to capture burdens and benefits when evaluating health interventions. DESIGN: Inductive qualitative process study nested in a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary Care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 35 participants taking antihypertensive medication and with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline participated in semistructured telephone interviews. INTERVENTION: Digital self-management intervention to support blood pressure self-monitoring and medication change when recommended by the healthcare professional. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with techniques from grounded theory. RESULTS: Seven themes were developed which reflected perceived burdens and benefits of using the intervention, including worry about health, uncertainty about self-monitoring and reassurance. The analysis showed how beliefs about their condition and treatment appeared to influence participants’ appraisal of the value of the intervention. This suggested that considering illness and treatment perceptions in Burden of Treatment theory could further our understanding of how individuals appraise the personal costs and benefits of self-managing their health. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ appraisal of the burden or benefit of using a complex self-management intervention seemed to be influenced by experiences within the intervention (such as perceived availability of support) and beliefs about their condition and treatment (such as perceived control and risk of side effects). Developing our ability to adequately capture these salient burdens and benefits for patients could help enhance evaluation of self-management interventions in the future. Many participants perceived important benefits from using the intervention, highlighting the need for theory to recognise that engaging in self-management can include positive as well as negative aspects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13790648; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5942415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59424152018-05-11 Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK Morton, Katherine Dennison, Laura Bradbury, Katherine Band, Rebecca Jane May, Carl Raftery, James Little, Paul McManus, Richard J Yardley, Lucy BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Digital interventions can change patients’ experiences of managing their health, either creating additional burden or improving their experience of healthcare. This qualitative study aimed to explore perceived burdens and benefits for patients using a digital self-management intervention for reducing high blood pressure. A secondary aim was to further our understanding of how best to capture burdens and benefits when evaluating health interventions. DESIGN: Inductive qualitative process study nested in a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary Care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 35 participants taking antihypertensive medication and with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline participated in semistructured telephone interviews. INTERVENTION: Digital self-management intervention to support blood pressure self-monitoring and medication change when recommended by the healthcare professional. ANALYSIS: Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with techniques from grounded theory. RESULTS: Seven themes were developed which reflected perceived burdens and benefits of using the intervention, including worry about health, uncertainty about self-monitoring and reassurance. The analysis showed how beliefs about their condition and treatment appeared to influence participants’ appraisal of the value of the intervention. This suggested that considering illness and treatment perceptions in Burden of Treatment theory could further our understanding of how individuals appraise the personal costs and benefits of self-managing their health. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ appraisal of the burden or benefit of using a complex self-management intervention seemed to be influenced by experiences within the intervention (such as perceived availability of support) and beliefs about their condition and treatment (such as perceived control and risk of side effects). Developing our ability to adequately capture these salient burdens and benefits for patients could help enhance evaluation of self-management interventions in the future. Many participants perceived important benefits from using the intervention, highlighting the need for theory to recognise that engaging in self-management can include positive as well as negative aspects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13790648; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5942415/ /pubmed/29739782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020843 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Morton, Katherine
Dennison, Laura
Bradbury, Katherine
Band, Rebecca Jane
May, Carl
Raftery, James
Little, Paul
McManus, Richard J
Yardley, Lucy
Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title_full Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title_fullStr Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title_short Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK
title_sort qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in primary care in the uk
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020843
work_keys_str_mv AT mortonkatherine qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT dennisonlaura qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT bradburykatherine qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT bandrebeccajane qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT maycarl qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT rafteryjames qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT littlepaul qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT mcmanusrichardj qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk
AT yardleylucy qualitativeprocessstudytoexploretheperceivedburdensandbenefitsofadigitalinterventionforselfmanaginghighbloodpressureinprimarycareintheuk