Cargando…

A novel early risk assessment tool for detecting clinical outcomes in patients with heat-related illness (J-ERATO score): Development and validation in independent cohorts in Japan

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a novel risk assessment tool to predict the clinical outcomes after heat-related illness. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter observational study. Patients who transferred to emergency hospitals in Japan with heat-related illness were registered. The sample was divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayashida, Kei, Kondo, Yutaka, Hifumi, Toru, Shimazaki, Junya, Oda, Yasutaka, Shiraishi, Shinichiro, Fukuda, Tatsuma, Sasaki, Junichi, Shimizu, Keiki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29742138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197032
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a novel risk assessment tool to predict the clinical outcomes after heat-related illness. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter observational study. Patients who transferred to emergency hospitals in Japan with heat-related illness were registered. The sample was divided into two parts: 60% to construct the score and 40% to validate it. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict hospital admission as a primary outcome. The resulting model was transformed into a scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 3,001 eligible patients were analyzed. There was no difference in variables between development and validation cohorts. Based on the result of a logistic regression model in the development phase (n = 1,805), the J-ERATO score was defined as the sum of the six binary components in the prehospital setting (respiratory rate≥22 /min, Glasgow coma scale<15, systolic blood pressure≤100 mmHg, heart rate≥100 bpm, body temperature≥38°C, and age≥65 y), for a total score ranging from 0 to 6. In the validation phase (n = 1,196), the score had excellent discrimination (C-statistic 0.84; 95% CI 0.79–0.89, p<0.0001) and calibration (P>0.2 by Hosmer-Lemeshow test). The observed proportion of hospital admission increased with increasing J-ERATO score (score = 0, 5.0%; score = 1, 15.0%; score = 2, 24.6%; score = 3, 38.6%; score = 4, 68.0%; score = 5, 85.2%; score = 6, 96.4%). Multivariate analyses showed that the J-ERATO score was an independent positive predictor of hospital admission (adjusted OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.06–2.87; P<0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (3.73; 2.95–4.72; P<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (1.65; 1.18–2.32; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The J-ERATO score is simply assessed and can facilitate the identification of patients with higher risk of heat-related hospitalization. This scoring system is also significantly associated with the higher likelihood of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality after heat-related hospitalization.