Cargando…

Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen was recommended by NICE in 2013 for chemoprevention of breast cancer, but a recent survey suggested only a quarter of GPs are aware of this. We set out to measure the uptake of tamoxifen, and the alternative raloxifene, in national prescribing data sets. METHODS: Tamoxifen and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, Helen J., Walker, Alex J., Goldacre, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0065-2
_version_ 1783321587854868480
author Curtis, Helen J.
Walker, Alex J.
Goldacre, Ben
author_facet Curtis, Helen J.
Walker, Alex J.
Goldacre, Ben
author_sort Curtis, Helen J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen was recommended by NICE in 2013 for chemoprevention of breast cancer, but a recent survey suggested only a quarter of GPs are aware of this. We set out to measure the uptake of tamoxifen, and the alternative raloxifene, in national prescribing data sets. METHODS: Tamoxifen and raloxifene data were extracted from England’s monthly prescribing data sets, October 2010–October 2017. We used interrupted time series analysis to reveal national and local responses to guidelines. We investigated variation between practices by calculating percentiles for prescribing rates and ratios of change. RESULTS: We found an increase in monthly tamoxifen prescribing following release of the guidelines, with an increase in gradient (p = 0.001) but no step change (p = 0.342). Alongside a small change in raloxifene prescribing we estimate 8450 women took up chemoprevention between 2013 and 2016. We did not find evidence that this was limited to a small group of practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the uptake of new guidance on chemoprevention has been slow and has potentially left women exposed to avoidable risk. Improving dissemination of guidance to healthcare professionals and routinely monitoring implementation could help reduce this risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5943266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59432662019-04-23 Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis Curtis, Helen J. Walker, Alex J. Goldacre, Ben Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen was recommended by NICE in 2013 for chemoprevention of breast cancer, but a recent survey suggested only a quarter of GPs are aware of this. We set out to measure the uptake of tamoxifen, and the alternative raloxifene, in national prescribing data sets. METHODS: Tamoxifen and raloxifene data were extracted from England’s monthly prescribing data sets, October 2010–October 2017. We used interrupted time series analysis to reveal national and local responses to guidelines. We investigated variation between practices by calculating percentiles for prescribing rates and ratios of change. RESULTS: We found an increase in monthly tamoxifen prescribing following release of the guidelines, with an increase in gradient (p = 0.001) but no step change (p = 0.342). Alongside a small change in raloxifene prescribing we estimate 8450 women took up chemoprevention between 2013 and 2016. We did not find evidence that this was limited to a small group of practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the uptake of new guidance on chemoprevention has been slow and has potentially left women exposed to avoidable risk. Improving dissemination of guidance to healthcare professionals and routinely monitoring implementation could help reduce this risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-23 2018-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5943266/ /pubmed/29681615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0065-2 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note: This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Curtis, Helen J.
Walker, Alex J.
Goldacre, Ben
Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title_full Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title_fullStr Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title_short Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
title_sort impact of nice guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in england 2011–2017: an interrupted time series analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0065-2
work_keys_str_mv AT curtishelenj impactofniceguidanceontamoxifenprescribinginengland20112017aninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT walkeralexj impactofniceguidanceontamoxifenprescribinginengland20112017aninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT goldacreben impactofniceguidanceontamoxifenprescribinginengland20112017aninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis