Cargando…

Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?

Is there anything that members of each binary category of gender have in common? Even many non-essentialists find the lack of unity within a gender worrying as it undermines the basis for a common political agenda for women. One promising proposal for achieving unity is by means of a shared historic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Godman, Marion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9619-1
_version_ 1783321610902568960
author Godman, Marion
author_facet Godman, Marion
author_sort Godman, Marion
collection PubMed
description Is there anything that members of each binary category of gender have in common? Even many non-essentialists find the lack of unity within a gender worrying as it undermines the basis for a common political agenda for women. One promising proposal for achieving unity is by means of a shared historical lineage of cultural reproduction with past binary models of gender (e.g. Bach in Ethics 122:231–272, 2012). I demonstrate how such an account is likely to take on board different binary and also non-binary systems of gender. This implies that all individuals construed as members of the category, “women” are in fact not members of the same historical kind after all! I then consider different possible means of modifying the account but conclude negatively: the problem runs deeper than has been appreciated thus far.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5943372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59433722018-05-14 Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders? Godman, Marion Biol Philos Article Is there anything that members of each binary category of gender have in common? Even many non-essentialists find the lack of unity within a gender worrying as it undermines the basis for a common political agenda for women. One promising proposal for achieving unity is by means of a shared historical lineage of cultural reproduction with past binary models of gender (e.g. Bach in Ethics 122:231–272, 2012). I demonstrate how such an account is likely to take on board different binary and also non-binary systems of gender. This implies that all individuals construed as members of the category, “women” are in fact not members of the same historical kind after all! I then consider different possible means of modifying the account but conclude negatively: the problem runs deeper than has been appreciated thus far. Springer Netherlands 2018-05-10 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5943372/ /pubmed/29769752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9619-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Godman, Marion
Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title_full Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title_fullStr Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title_full_unstemmed Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title_short Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
title_sort gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9619-1
work_keys_str_mv AT godmanmarion genderasahistoricalkindataleoftwogenders